World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joachim Kimmerle

Joachim Kimmerle

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4614
World Ranking
10245
National Ranking
488

Joachim Kimmerle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kimmerle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joachim Kimmerle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kimmerle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Kimmerle is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has a multidisciplinary research profile primarily situated within the social sciences, psychology, and medicine. Their work encompasses a range of topics including artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education, animal and plant science education, empathy and medical education, and patient-provider communication in healthcare.

The scientist's recent scholarly contributions include publications across several well-regarded journals. Notable papers are:

  • Medical Students' Attitudes Toward AI in Medicine and their Expectations for Medical Education, 2023, Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
  • Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective, 2023, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  • Automated journalism: The effects of AI authorship and evaluative information on the perception of a science journalism article, 2022, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Improving attitudes and knowledge in a citizen science project about urban bat ecology, 2022, Ecology and Society
  • Digital Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Literature Review of the Role of Individual vs. Social Settings for Measuring Learning Outcomes, 2020, Education Sciences

Kimmerle has collaborated frequently with a core group of co-authors, including Martina Bientzle, Ulrike Creß, Hannah Greving, Angelica Lermann Henestrosa, and Marie Eggeling. These collaborations have contributed to research output in overlapping thematic areas.

The researcher's scientific output is prominently published in venues such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, Conservation Science and Practice, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and PLoS ONE. This range reflects interdisciplinary engagement across computer science, education, environmental research, and medical education.

Within the broader fields of study, Joachim Kimmerle's work has focused on subfields including social psychology, artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, general health professions, and developmental and educational psychology.

Specific research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Best Publications

  • A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis

    Ulrike Cress;Joachim Kimmerle

  • The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress;Christoph Held

  • Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective.

    Joachim Kimmerle;Johannes Moskaliuk;Aileen Oeberst;Ulrike Cress

  • Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: effects of incongruity between knowledge and information

    Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Information Exchange With Shared Databases as a Social Dilemma The Effect of Metaknowledge, Bonus Systems, and Costs

    Ulrike Cress;Joachim Kimmerle;Friedrich W. Hesse

  • Using Wikis for Learning and Knowledge Building: Results of an Experimental Study.

    Joachim Kimmerle;Johannes Moskaliuk;Ulrike Cress

  • Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity

    Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?)

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress;Friedrich W. Hesse

  • The collective knowledge of social tags: Direct and indirect influences on navigation, learning, and information processing

    Ulrike Cress;Christoph Held;Joachim Kimmerle

  • The social psychology of knowledge management

    Joachim Kimmerle;Katrin Wodzicki;Ulrike Cress

  • Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective

    Unknown

  • Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia: A Systemic-Constructivist Analysis

    Aileen Oeberst;Iassen Halatchliyski;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • THE EFFECTS OF TV AND FILM EXPOSURE ON KNOWLEDGE ABOUT AND ATTITUDES TOWARD MENTAL DISORDERS

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept

    Joachim Kimmerle;Ansgar Thiel;Kim-Kristin Gerbing;Martina Bientzle

  • VISUALIZING CO-EVOLUTION OF INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE

    Joachim Kimmerle;Johannes Moskaliuk;Andreas Harrer;Ulrike Cress

  • Explaining authors' contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia's knowledge base

    Iassen Halatchliyski;Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • Digital Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Literature Review of the Role of Individual vs. Social Settings for Measuring Learning Outcomes

    Elke Kümmel;Johannes Moskaliuk;Ulrike Cress;Joachim Kimmerle

  • Learning by foraging: The impact of individual knowledge and social tags on web navigation processes

    Christoph Held;Joachim Kimmerle;Ulrike Cress

  • How Laypeople Understand the Tentativeness of Medical Research News in the Media An Experimental Study on the Perception of Information About Deep Brain Stimulation

    Joachim Kimmerle;Joachim Kimmerle;Danny Flemming;Insa Feinkohl;Ulrike Cress;Ulrike Cress

  • Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework

    Heisawn Jeong;Ulrike Cress;Ulrike Cress;Johannes Moskaliuk;Johannes Moskaliuk;Joachim Kimmerle;Joachim Kimmerle

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrike Cress
Ulrike Cress Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Mathieu d'Aquin
Mathieu d'Aquin University of Lorraine
Kai Sassenberg
Kai Sassenberg Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University
Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alireza Gharabaghi
Alireza Gharabaghi University of Tübingen
Pierre Dillenbourg
Pierre Dillenbourg École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Sonja Utz
Sonja Utz Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens up a wide range of career possibilities, especially in the field of counseling and mental health support. Many students pursue online degrees to prepare for roles such as substance abuse counselor, which is increasingly in demand across the United States.

While core coursework covers topics like counseling techniques and human development, substance abuse counselor requirements in Chandler highlight the importance of specialized training and local certifications. Similarly, understanding the Charlotte substance abuse counselors education requirements can help you plan your academic path and meet state-specific expectations.

Each city may have its own set of rules and preparation steps. For example, learning about substance abuse counselor requirements in Chesapeake or the process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chicago can guide you toward the necessary licensure, practicum experience, and advanced studies. Exploring online programs and understanding regional requirements will help you create a targeted, successful career pathway in the psychology field.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Kimmerle

Trending Scientists