World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Mexico
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
75
Citations
22001
World Ranking
1056
National Ranking
1

Miguel Martínez-Ramos publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Martínez-Ramos sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 186 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Miguel Martínez-Ramos D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Martínez-Ramos sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Mexico Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Mexico Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Mexico Leader Award

Overview

Miguel Martínez-Ramos is affiliated with the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing extensively to these fields through numerous publications and collaborations.

The primary fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these areas, Martínez-Ramos has specialized in subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Forestry
  • Ecology

The main research topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems

A selection of recent papers includes:

  • Multidimensional tropical forest recovery, 2021, published in Science
  • Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession, 2021, published in Journal of Ecology
  • Successional theories, 2023, published in Biological Reviews
  • Functional recovery of secondary tropical forests, 2021, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A comprehensive framework for vegetation succession, 2024, published in Ecosphere

Martínez-Ramos collaborates frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Frans Bongers
  • Jorge A. Meave
  • Lourens Poorter
  • Madelon Lohbeck
  • Masha T. van der Sande

Their research is often published in venues such as:

  • Biological Conservation
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests

    Lourens Poorter;Frans Bongers;T. Mitchell Aide;Angélica M. Almeyda Zambrano

  • ARE FUNCTIONAL TRAITS GOOD PREDICTORS OF DEMOGRAPHIC RATES? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE NEOTROPICAL FORESTS

    L. Poorter;S. J. Wright;H. Paz;D. D. Ackerly

  • Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances

    Robin L Chazdon;Susan G Letcher;Michiel van Breugel;Michiel van Breugel;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: New insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research

    Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Felipe P. L. Melo;Miguel Martínez-Ramos;Frans Bongers

  • Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human‐modified Tropical Landscapes

    Robin L. Chazdon;Celia A. Harvey;Oliver Komar;Daniel M. Griffith

  • Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics

    Robin L. Chazdon;Robin L. Chazdon;Eben N. Broadbent;Danaë M. A. Rozendaal;Danaë M. A. Rozendaal;Danaë M. A. Rozendaal;Frans Bongers

  • Integrating Agricultural Landscapes with Biodiversity Conservation in the Mesoamerican Hotspot

    Celia A. Harvey;Oliver Komar;Robin Chazdon;Bruce G. Ferguson

  • Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests

    L. Poorter;M. T. van der Sande;J. Thompson;E. J. M. M. Arets

  • On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes.

    Felipe P.L. Melo;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Lenore Fahrig;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • Multidimensional tropical forest recovery

    Unknown

  • Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven neotropical forests

    Ian J. Wright;David D. Ackerly;Frans Bongers;Kyle E. Harms;Kyle E. Harms

  • Biodiversity recovery of Neotropical secondary forests

    Danaë Rozendaal;Frans Bongers;T. Mitchell Aide;Esteban Álvarez-Dávila

  • Impact of Forest Fragmentation on Understory Plant Species Richness in Amazonia

    Julieta Benítez-Malvido;Julieta Benítez-Malvido;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • Successional changes in functional composition contrast for dry and wet tropical forest

    Madelon Lohbeck;Madelon Lohbeck;Lourens Poorter;Edwin Lebrija-Trejos;Edwin Lebrija-Trejos;Edwin Lebrija-Trejos;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • Successional dynamics in Neotropical forests are as uncertain as they are predictable

    Natalia Norden;Héctor A. Angarita;Frans Bongers;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Rarámuri community: a gender perspective for conservation.

    Andrés Camou-Guerrero;Victoria Reyes-García;Miguel Martínez-Ramos;Alejandro Casas

  • Demography and allometry of Cecropia obtusifolia, a neotropical pioneer tree - an evaluation of the climax-pioneer paradigm for tropical rain forests

    Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla;Miguel Martinez-Ramos

  • A Standard Protocol for Liana Censuses

    Jeffrey J. Gerwing;Stefan A. Schnitzer;Robyn J. Burnham;Frans Bongers

  • Biomass is the main driver of changes in ecosystem process rates during tropical forest succession

    Madelon Lohbeck;Madelon Lohbeck;Lourens Poorter;Miguel Martínez-Ramos;Frans Bongers

  • Seed bank versus seed rain in the regeneration of a tropical pioneer tree.

    Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla;Miguel Martínez-Ramos

  • A population model of Astrocaryum mexicanum and a sensitivity analysis of its finite rate of increase.

    D. Pinero;M. Martinez-Ramos;J. Sarukhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michiel van Breugel
Michiel van Breugel National University of Singapore
Frans Bongers
Frans Bongers Wageningen University & Research
Lourens Poorter
Lourens Poorter Wageningen University & Research
Jorge A. Meave
Jorge A. Meave National Autonomous University of Mexico
Robin L. Chazdon
Robin L. Chazdon University of Connecticut
Patricia Balvanera
Patricia Balvanera National Autonomous University of Mexico
Niels P. R. Anten
Niels P. R. Anten Wageningen University & Research
Bryan Finegan
Bryan Finegan Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center
David D. Ackerly
David D. Ackerly University of California, Berkeley
Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla
Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla National Autonomous University of Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career opportunities in research, conservation, and education. If you're looking to further your studies, many nonprofit online universities now offer flexible science programs that allow you to balance your education with other commitments.

For those transitioning from different fields, bridging programs are increasingly popular. For example, professionals in nursing can compare programs like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn to find the best fit for advancing their credentials online. Likewise, those aiming for higher roles may consider enrolling in a bsn to msn bridge program, which highlights the pathways available across disciplines.

The United States also offers strong support for service members, with a range of online colleges for military that cater to unique schedules and needs. Whether you're seeking a direct path into ecology or a related career, online programs provide accessibility, flexibility, and quality education to help you reach your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel Martínez-Ramos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles