World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4138 3819 186 183 129 16423

Jens Förster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jens Förster between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jens Förster published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 4 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jens Förster: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 5
1999 0
2000 6
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 6
2005 7
2006 3
2007 9
2008 9
2009 16
2010 13
2011 8
2012 16
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 136
Download as CSV

Jens Förster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Förster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jens Förster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Förster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jens Förster is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of physics, particularly focusing on magnetic properties and materials science. Their research spans several interconnected areas within physics and astronomy, with a strong emphasis on atomic and molecular physics, optics, and materials science.

The main fields of study for Förster include:

  • Physics and Astronomy

The subfields of study cover:

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Structural Biology

Förster's central research topics reflect these fields and emphasize magnetic phenomena and their applications. The primary topics include:

  • Magnetic properties of thin films
  • Magnetic Properties and Applications
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Theoretical and Computational Physics

Their recent scholarly publications illustrate their research focus and have appeared in several influential journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Reconfigurable submicrometer spin-wave majority gate with electrical transducers," 2020, Science Advances
  • "Ferrimagnetic Skyrmions in Topological Insulator/Ferrimagnet Heterostructures," 2020, Advanced Materials
  • "Real-Space Observation of Magnon Interaction with Driven Space-Time Crystals," 2021, Physical Review Letters
  • "Spin-Wave Emission from Vortex Cores under Static Magnetic Bias Fields," 2021, Nano Letters
  • "Thermal nucleation and high-resolution imaging of submicrometer magnetic bubbles in thin thulium iron garnet films with perpendicular anisotropy," 2020, Physical Review Materials

Their work has been published repeatedly in certain journals, including:

  • Nano Letters
  • physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters
  • Science Advances
  • Advanced Materials
  • Physical Review Letters

Förster has collaborated frequently with several coauthors who have contributed to advancing their research topics. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Markus Weigand (18 joint publications)
  • Joachim Gräfe (14 joint publications)
  • Nick Träger (11 joint publications)
  • Gisela Schütz (11 joint publications)
  • Sebastian Wintz (10 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.

    Ronald S. Friedman;Jens Förster

  • Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment : Regulatory focus and the goal looms larger effect

    J Förster;E T Higgins;L C Idson

  • Temporal Construal Effects on Abstract and Concrete Thinking: Consequences for Insight and Creative Cognition.

    Jens Förster;Ronald S. Friedman;Nira Liberman

  • Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?

    Jens Förster;E.Tory Higgins;Amy Taylor Bianco

  • How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus

    Jens Förster;E. Tory Higgins

  • Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals

    Jens Förster;Nira Liberman;E. Tory Higgins

  • Seven Principles of Goal Activation: A Systematic Approach to Distinguishing Goal Priming From Priming of Non-Goal Constructs

    Jens Förster;Nira Liberman;Ronald S Friedman

  • Stereotype Threat and Performance: How Self-Stereotypes Influence Processing by Inducing Regulatory Foci.

    Beate Seibt;Jens Förster

  • The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight.

    Ronald S. Friedman;Jens Förster

  • Success/Failure Feedback, Expectancies, and Approach/Avoidance Motivation: How Regulatory Focus Moderates Classic Relations

    Jens Förster;Heidi Grant;Lorraine Chen Idson;E.Tory Higgins

  • Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: an integrative review.

    Ronald S. Friedman;Jens Förster

  • The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition.

    Ronald S. Friedman;Jens Förster

  • Effects of Motivational Cues on Perceptual Asymmetry: Implications for Creativity and Analytical Problem Solving

    Ronald S. Friedman;Jens Förster

  • Attentional Priming Effects on Creativity

    Ronald S. Friedman;Ayelet Fishbach;Jens Förster;Lioba Werth

  • GLOMOsys: A systems account of global versus local processing.

    Jens Förster;Laura Dannenberg

  • Distancing from experienced self: how global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance.

    Nira Liberman;Jens Förster

  • Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention

    Jens Förster;Ronald S. Friedman;Amina Özelsel;Markus Denzler

  • The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.

    Jens Förster;Nira Liberman;Stefanie Kuschel

  • Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation

    Roland Neumann;Jens Förster;Fritz Strack

  • Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: a case of conceptual-motor compatibility.

    Jens Förster;Fritz Strack

Frequent Co-Authors

Nira Liberman
Nira Liberman Tel Aviv University
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Frenk van Harreveld
Frenk van Harreveld University of Amsterdam
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Thomas Mussweiler
Thomas Mussweiler London Business School
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Anne Maass
Anne Maass University of Padua
Olivier Corneille
Olivier Corneille Université Catholique de Louvain
Joop van der Pligt
Joop van der Pligt University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and rewarding careers, including substance abuse counseling. Requirements for becoming a counselor can vary significantly depending on the city and state, which makes understanding local pathways crucial.

For example, those interested in serving communities in Wisconsin can review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Milwaukee. Similarly, aspirants looking to make an impact in Minnesota should explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Minneapolis.

If Nashville’s music city culture inspires you, learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Nashville is a critical step. Those interested in providing mental health support in the unique landscape of Louisiana can research how to become a substance abuse counselor in New Orleans.

Whether you plan to pursue licensure or practice in another setting, researching local requirements and choosing the right online psychology degree are essential steps for your career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Förster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles