World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
12993
World Ranking
3256
National Ranking
168

Joop van der Pligt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop van der Pligt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joop van der Pligt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop van der Pligt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joop van der Pligt is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic career focuses on psychological and social research related to human behavior and decision-making processes, although specific fields of study and research topics have not been explicitly detailed in the available data.

Currently, no recent publications are listed, nor are there details on co-authors or frequent publication venues connected to their work.

Information on book publications, awards, and other scholarly honors is also not available for this scientist. The absence of these data points limits the scope of documentation on their academic impact through citations or recognitions.

Their research contributions, as currently documented, do not contain any enumerated main topics or subfields, suggesting that either the data has not been comprehensively indexed or their professional focus may not have been extensively covered in accessible records.

Best Publications

  • On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Wilco W. van Dijk;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Joop van der Pligt

  • Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

    J. Richard Eiser;Ann Bostrom;Ian Burton;David M. Johnston

  • Consequences of regret aversion : effects of expected feedback on risky decision making

    M Marcel Zeelenberg;J Beattie;van der J Pligt;de Nk Koen Vries

  • The experience of regret and disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Wilco W. van Dijk;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Joop van der Pligt

  • The Agony of Ambivalence and Ways to Resolve It: Introducing the MAID Model:

    Frenk van Harreveld;Joop van der Pligt;Yael N de Liver

  • Anticipated Regret and Time Perspective: Changing Sexual Risk‐taking Behavior

    René Richard;Joop Van Der Pligt;Nanne De Vries

  • Attitudes and decisions

    J Richard Eiser;Joop van der Pligt

  • Risk Perception and Self-Protective Behavior

    Joop van der Pligt

  • Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour

    Joop van der Pligt

  • Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: feeling tense before jumping off the fence

    Frenk van Harreveld;Bastiaan T. Rutjens;Mark Rotteveel;Loran F. Nordgren

  • Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing

    Loran F. Nordgren;Frenk van Harreveld;Joop van der Pligt

  • Anticipated Regret and Precautionary Sexual Behavior1

    René Richard;Nanne K. de Vries;Joop van der Pligt

  • Ambivalence towards meat.

    Mariëtte Berndsen;Joop van der Pligt

  • Categories of Category Accessibility: The Impact of Trait Concept versus Exemplar Priming on Person Judgments ☆

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen;Joop van der Pligt

  • Blessed are those who expect nothing: Lowering expectations as a way of avoiding disappointment

    Wilco W. van Dijk;Marcel Zeelenberg;Joop van der Pligt

  • Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality

    C Martijn;Russell Spears;J Van Der Pligt;E Jakobs

  • Factors affecting condom use among adolescents

    René Richard;Joop Van Der Pligt

  • Unpacking Perceived Control in Risk Perception: The Mediating Role of Anticipated Regret

    Loran F. Nordgren;Joop Van Der Pligt;Frenk Van Harreveld

  • Positive and negative associations underlying ambivalent attitudes

    Yaël de Liver;Joop van der Pligt;Daniël Wigboldus

  • The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation

    Helma van den Berg;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Joop van der Pligt;Daniël H. J. Wigboldus

Frequent Co-Authors

Frenk van Harreveld
Frenk van Harreveld University of Amsterdam
Willem Koomen
Willem Koomen University of Amsterdam
Nanne K. de Vries
Nanne K. de Vries Maastricht University
Bertjan Doosje
Bertjan Doosje University of Amsterdam
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
J. Richard Eiser
J. Richard Eiser University of Sheffield
Andrés Catena
Andrés Catena University of Granada
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Marcel Zeelenberg
Marcel Zeelenberg Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online program options and career pathways, with therapy and counseling being some of the most popular choices. Students frequently consider careers as Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs), a role in high demand across the U.S. However, MFT certification and education requirements can vary depending on your location.

For example, those interested in working in Tennessee should look into the Memphis mft certification requirements. In Arizona, prospective therapists must meet Mesa's specific training and licensure standards, as outlined in the Mesa mft education requirements.

Students considering practice in Florida can find details about the educational process and licensure by consulting how to become a marriage and family therapist in Miami. Those planning to work in Wisconsin should understand the Milwaukee mft certification requirements.

Exploring these regional requirements is essential before choosing an online degree or career path in psychology, as it helps ensure you are on track for licensure where you intend to work.

Best Scientists Citing Joop van der Pligt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles