World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diederik A. Stapel

Diederik A. Stapel

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
9424
World Ranking
5253
National Ranking
248

Diederik A. Stapel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diederik A. Stapel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diederik A. Stapel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diederik A. Stapel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diederik A. Stapel is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a specific focus on Clinical Psychology. The main topics of their research work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, and Anxiety Studies.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Civet Coffee Bean
  • David Rosenhahn
  • Jorge Enrique Briceño Suárez
  • Iansá Cuckoo
  • Sarah Jane Oxum

Diederik A. Stapel has contributed to research largely in the domain of Psychology, predominantly dealing with clinical aspects. Their scholarly output extensively covers behavioral and psychological dimensions related to perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety, illustrating ongoing engagement with these intersecting areas.

Although recent papers with details on titles, publication years, and venues are not listed, the researcher maintains a record of collaboration and publication activity in Psychology and Clinical Psychology, as evidenced by topic and coauthor data.

Best Publications

  • Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior.

    A Dijksterhuis;Russell Spears;Tom Postmes;DA Stapel

  • Power Increases Hypocrisy Moralizing in Reasoning, Immorality in Behavior

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel;Adam D. Galinsky

  • I, we, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects.

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen

  • We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat

    David M Marx;Diederik A Stapel;Dominique Muller

  • From seeing to being: subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations.

    Diederik A. Stapel;Hart Blanton

  • Power increases dehumanization

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel

  • How power influences moral thinking

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel

  • Differentiating Social and Personal Power: Opposite Effects on Stereotyping, but Parallel Effects on Behavioral Approach Tendencies:

    Joris Lammers;Janka I. Stoker;Diederik A. Stapel

  • Power Increases Infidelity Among Men and Women

    Joris Lammers;Janka I Stoker;Jennifer Jordan;Monique Pollmann

  • Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me.

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen

  • Categories of Category Accessibility: The Impact of Trait Concept versus Exemplar Priming on Person Judgments ☆

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen;Joop van der Pligt

  • On building, defending, and regulating the self : a psychological perspective

    Abraham Tesser;Joanne V. Wood;Diederik A. Stapel

  • On models and vases: body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects.

    Debra Trampe;Diederik A. Stapel;Frans W. Siero

  • Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts.

    Pim W. Teunissen;Diederik A. Stapel;Cees van der Vleuten;Albert Scherpbier

  • Distinctness of others, mutability of selves: Their impact on self-evaluations

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen

  • Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance

    Diederik A. Stapel;Piotr Winkielman

  • The Smell of Bias: What Instigates Correction Processes in Social Judgments?

    Diederik A. Stapel;Leonard L. Martin;Norbert Schwarz

  • The effects of diffuse and distinct affect

    Diederik A. Stapel;Willem Koomen;Kirsten I. Ruys

  • Self-activation increases social comparison.

    Diederik A. Stapel;Abraham Tesser

  • The magic spell of language: linguistic categories and their perceptual consequences.

    Diederik A. Stapel;Gün R. Semin

  • Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes.

    D.A. Stapel

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem Koomen
Willem Koomen University of Amsterdam
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Joris Lammers
Joris Lammers University of Cologne
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Hart Blanton
Hart Blanton Texas A&M University
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Charles M. Judd
Charles M. Judd University of Colorado Boulder
Jerry Suls
Jerry Suls University of Iowa
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Pim W. Teunissen
Pim W. Teunissen Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to diverse online degree programs and career paths. Many students pursue specific roles such as substance abuse counseling, a growing field with a critical societal impact. Each state and city has unique requirements for these positions, so it’s essential to understand the local pathways. For example, you can explore the Stockton substance abuse counselors education requirements to learn about educational and licensing steps required in that area.

Similarly, if you’re interested in working in Florida, see how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tampa for insights on relevant programs and state-specific regulations. Those aiming for opportunities in Ohio can review guidance on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Toledo.

For prospects in Arizona, it’s valuable to learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tucson. Online psychology degrees make it easier to meet these requirements nationwide, helping create flexible, rewarding pathways for aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Diederik A. Stapel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles