World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4566
World Ranking
11160
National Ranking
5835

Kenneth G. DeMarree publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth G. DeMarree sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kenneth G. DeMarree D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth G. DeMarree sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Leader Emergence: The Case of the Narcissistic Leader

    Amy B. Brunell;William A. Gentry;W. Keith Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman

  • The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength

    Richard E. Petty;Pablo Briñol;Kenneth G. DeMarree

  • Understanding the Role of the Self in Prime-to-Behavior Effects: The Active-Self Account

    S. Christian Wheeler;Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty

  • Priming a new identity: self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior.

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;S. Christian Wheeler;Richard E. Petty

  • The Effect of Self-Affirmation in Nonthreatening Persuasion Domains: Timing Affects the Process:

    Pablo Briñol;Richard E. Petty;Ismael Gallardo;Kenneth G. DeMarree

  • Multiple Mechanisms of Prime‐to‐Behavior Effects

    S. Christian Wheeler;Kenneth G. DeMarree

  • Need for Cognition Can Magnify or Attenuate Priming Effects in Social Judgment

    Richard E. Petty;Kenneth G. DeMarree;Pablo Briñol;Javier Horcajo

  • Wanting other attitudes: Actual–desired attitude discrepancies predict feelings of ambivalence and ambivalence consequences

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;S. Christian Wheeler;Pablo Briñol;Richard E. Petty

  • Unskilled and unaware in the classroom: College students’ desired grades predict their biased grade predictions

    Michael J. Serra;Kenneth G. DeMarree

  • UNDERSTANDING PRIME-TO-BEHAVIOR EFFECTS: INSIGHTS FROM THE ACTIVE-SELF ACCOUNT

    S. Christian Wheeler;Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty

  • Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale

    Robert O. Hartman;Nathan F. Dieckmann;Amber M. Sprenger;Bradley J. Stastny

  • The Listener Sets the Tone: High-Quality Listening Increases Attitude Clarity and Behavior-Intention Consequences.

    Guy Itzchakov;Guy Itzchakov;Kenneth G DeMarree;Avraham N Kluger;Yaara Turjeman-Levi

  • Self-certainty: Parallels to Attitude Certainty

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty;Pablo Briñol

  • From Primed Construct to Motivated Behavior Validation Processes in Goal Pursuit

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;Chris Loersch;Pablo Briñol;Richard E. Petty

  • Does self-consciousness increase or decrease priming effects? It depends

    S. Christian Wheeler;Kimberly Rios Morrison;Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty

  • Examining the interrelationships between social anxiety, smoking to cope, and cigarette craving

    Noreen L. Watson;Joseph W. VanderVeen;Lee M. Cohen;Kenneth G. DeMarree

  • Self and Attitude Strength Parallels: Focus on Accessibility

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty;Pablo Briñol

  • Who am I and who are you? Priming and the influence of self versus other focused attention

    Kenneth G. DeMarree;Chris Loersch

  • The Roles of the Self in Priming-to-Behavior Effects.

    S. Christian Wheeler;Kenneth G. DeMarree;Richard E. Petty

  • A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures

    Warren Tierney;Jay Hardy;Charles Raymond Ebersole;Domenico Viganola

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
Pablo Briñol
Pablo Briñol Autonomous University of Madrid
S. Christian Wheeler
S. Christian Wheeler Stanford University
Kristin Naragon-Gainey
Kristin Naragon-Gainey University of Western Australia
Derek D. Rucker
Derek D. Rucker Northwestern University
Denis M. McCarthy
Denis M. McCarthy University of Missouri
Eric R. Igou
Eric R. Igou University of Limerick
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia
Wendi L. Gardner
Wendi L. Gardner Northwestern University
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth G. DeMarree

Recently Published Articles