World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
12967
World Ranking
10700
National Ranking
5589

Brian J. Hoffman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Hoffman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 62 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian J. Hoffman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian J. Hoffman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian J. Hoffman is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily centers around the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Psychology.

Their work extensively covers several subfields, including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Communication, General Health Professions, and Demography. These areas reflect a broad interdisciplinary approach within social sciences and management studies.

Research topics addressed by Brian J. Hoffman include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Cultural Differences and Values, International Student and Expatriate Challenges, Employment and Welfare Studies, Retirement, Disability, and Employment, Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring, and Work-Family Balance Challenges.

Their recent publication record shows engagement with the Journal of Management, illustrating the focus of their research on organizational and managerial themes. The most recent paper is titled "How Culture Shapes the Influence of Work Design Characteristics: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review", published in 2023 in the Journal of Management.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Brian J. Hoffman include:

  • Lauren A. Wegman
  • Kameron M. Carter
  • Andrea L. Hetrick
  • Meng Chen
  • Stephen E. Humphrey

These collaborators suggest a network of scholars involved in organizational behavior and management research. The single recent publication visible indicates a specific interest in cultural influences on work design, combining narrative and meta-analytic methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing:

    Jean M. Twenge;Stacy M. Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman;Charles E. Lance

  • A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSON–ORGANIZATION FIT AND BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES

    Brian J. Hoffman;David J. Woehr

  • Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis.

    Joshua D. Miller;Brian J. Hoffman;Eric T. Gaughan;Brittany Gentile

  • Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature.

    Brian J. Hoffman;Carrie A. Blair;John P. Meriac;David J. Woehr

  • Narcissism in organizational contexts

    W. Keith Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman;Stacy M. Campbell;Gaia Marchisio

  • An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring.

    Lillian Turner de Tormes Eby;Tammy D. Allen;Brian J. Hoffman;Lisa E. Baranik

  • Leader Emergence: The Case of the Narcissistic Leader

    Amy B. Brunell;William A. Gentry;W. Keith Campbell;Brian J. Hoffman

  • Person-Organization Value Congruence: How Transformational Leaders Influence Work Group Effectiveness

    Brian J. Hoffman;Bethany H. Bynum;Ronald F. Piccolo;Ashley W. Sutton

  • Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions

    Charles E. Lance;Bryan Dawson;David Birkelbach;Brian J. Hoffman

  • A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: the narcissistic personality inventory-13 and the narcissistic personality inventory-16.

    Brittany Gentile;Joshua D. Miller;Brian J. Hoffman;Dennis E. Reidy

  • Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness

    Brian J. Hoffman;David J. Woehr;Robyn Maldagen-Youngjohn;Brian D. Lyons

  • Narcissism in Organizations: A Multisource Appraisal Reflects Different Perspectives

    Carrie A. Blair;Brian J. Hoffman;Katherine R. Helland

  • Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: a meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings.

    John P. Meriac;Brian J. Hoffman;David J. Woehr;Matthew S. Fleisher

  • Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations

    Deborah E. Rupp;Deborah E. Rupp;Brain J. Hoffman;David Bischof;William Byham

  • RATER SOURCE EFFECTS ARE ALIVE AND WELL AFTER ALL

    Brian Hoffman;Charles E. Lance;Bethany Bynum;William A. Gentry

  • Placing Job Characteristics in Context Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Changes in Job Characteristics Since 1975

    Lauren A. Wegman;Brian J. Hoffman;Nathan T. Carter;Jean M. Twenge

  • Common and specific emotion-related predictors of anxious and depressive symptoms in youth.

    Cynthia Suveg;Brian Hoffman;Janice L. Zeman;Kristel Thomassin

  • Multiple intelligences of transformational leaders: an empirical examination

    Brian J. Hoffman;Brian C. Frost

  • Rater source factors represent important subcomponents of the criterion construct space, not rater bias

    Charles E. Lance;Brian J. Hoffman;William A. Gentry;Lisa E. Baranik

  • Cross-lagged relations between mentoring received from supervisors and employee OCBs: Disentangling causal direction and identifying boundary conditions.

    Lillian T. Eby;Marcus M. Butts;Brian J. Hoffman;Julia B. Sauer

  • Leader Narcissism and Ethical Context: Effects on Ethical Leadership and Leader Effectiveness

    Brian J. Hoffman;Sarah E. Strang;Karl W. Kuhnert;W. Keith Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Jean M. Twenge
Jean M. Twenge San Diego State University
Richard D. Goffin
Richard D. Goffin University of Western Ontario
William H. Bommer
William H. Bommer California State University, Fresno
Dennis E. Reidy
Dennis E. Reidy Georgia State University
Lillian T. Eby
Lillian T. Eby University of Georgia
Amos Zeichner
Amos Zeichner University of Georgia
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up a variety of online degree options and professional pathways. Many students aspire to become school counselors, a rewarding role that supports student growth and well-being.

Requirements for becoming a school counselor can vary by state. For those interested in becoming a school counselor in Maine, candidates must complete a relevant master’s degree and specific internship hours. Meanwhile, the Maryland school counselor education requirements include coursework in counseling theories, human development, and ethical issues, along with a supervised practicum.

If you are considering where to study, it can help to compare the requirements to be a school counselor in Massachusetts with those in other states, as each region has unique standards. Similarly, understanding the Michigan school counselor education requirements can help you plan your educational and professional journey more effectively.

Exploring these pathways can help ensure your chosen online psychology degree aligns with your desired career in education, counseling, or mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing Brian J. Hoffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles