World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10356 9694 724 680 89 8403

Richard D. Goffin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard D. Goffin between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard D. Goffin published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2007. 5 of the 92 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2007. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1988 2025

92 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard D. Goffin: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 0
2003 4
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 1
2009 5
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 2
2014 3
2015 3
2016 5
2017 1
2018 3
2019 2
2020 3
2021 3
2022 1
2023 4
2024 3
2025 2
Total 92
Download as CSV

Richard D. Goffin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Goffin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard D. Goffin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Goffin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard D. Goffin is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology and Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on organizational behavior and human resource management, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, management science and operations research, and social psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including personality traits and psychology, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, social and intergroup psychology, deception detection and forensic psychology, psychometric methodologies and testing, employer branding and e-HRM, and multi-criteria decision making.

They have contributed to various academic publications, often collaborating with frequent co-authors such as Justin R. Feeney, Kabir N. Daljeet, Julie Aitken Schermer, Ian R. Gellatly, and Michelle Inness.

Richard D. Goffin's recent papers include the following:

  • Organizational Attachment, 2020, Journal of Personnel Psychology
  • Using the 16PF to Test the Differentiation of Personality by Intelligence Hypothesis, 2020, Journal of Intelligence
  • Applicant faking warnings: Are they really effective?, 2022, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Simulated job applicant test-taker reactions to rejection: comparing absolute and social-comparative feedback, 2023, Current Psychology
  • Relative and absolute self-ratings of work performance: Does social comparison lead to an enhanced thought process in self-evaluations?, 2021, International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Their research has been published predominantly in journals such as the Journal of Personnel Psychology, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Personality and Individual Differences, Current Psychology, and Journal of Intelligence.

Best Publications

  • Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts.

    John P. Meyer;Sampo V. Paunonen;Ian R. Gellatly;Richard D. Goffin

  • Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities:linking process with outcome

    Gillian King;Susanne King;Peter Rosenbaum;Richard Goffin

  • The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?

    Mitchell G. Rothstein;Richard D. Goffin

  • CORRECTING THE 16PF FOR FAKING: EFFECTS ON CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY AND INDIVIDUAL HIRING DECISIONS

    Neil D. Christiansen;Richard D. Goffin;Norman G. Johnston;Mitchell G. Rothstein

  • Measuring job interview anxiety: Beyond weak knees and sweaty palms.

    Julie McCarthy;Richard Goffin

  • A leadership self-efficacy taxonomy and its relation to effective leadership ☆

    David W. Anderson;Henryk T. Krajewski;Richard D. Goffin;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Personality testing and the assessment center : Incremental validity for managerial selection

    Richard D. Goffin;Mitchell G. Rothstein;Norman G. Johnston

  • Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking.

    Richard D. Goffin;Allison C. Boyd

  • Correcting Personality Tests for Faking: A Review of Popular Personality Tests and an Initial Survey of Researchers

    Richard D. Goffin;Neil D. Christiansen

  • A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure

    Douglas N. Jackson;Sampo V. Paunonen;Maryann Fraboni;Richard D. Goffin

  • A multi‐rater assessment of organizational commitment: are self‐report measures biased?

    Richard D. Goffin;Ian R. Gellatly

  • Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment

    Richard D. Goffin;Edward Helmes

  • Assessing the adequacy of structural equation models: Golden rules and editorial policies

    Richard D. Goffin

  • Is It All Relative?: Comparative Judgments and the Possible Improvement of Self-Ratings and Ratings of Others

    Richard D. Goffin;James M. Olson

  • A Comparison of Two New Indices for the Assessment of Fit of Structural Equation Models

    Richard D. Goffin

  • Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance.

    Barbara M. Byrne;Richard D. Goffin

  • Selection Test Anxiety: Exploring Tension and Fear of Failure Across the Sexes in Simulated Selection Scenarios

    Julie M. McCarthy;Richard D. Goffin

  • Criterion validation of two approaches to performance appraisal: The behavioral observation scale and the relative percentile method

    Richard D. Goffin;Ian R. Gellatly;Sampo V. Paunonen;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Problems and solutions in human assessment : honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy

    Douglas Northrop Jackson;Richard D. Goffin;Edward Helmes

  • Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method

    Richard D. Goffin;R. Blake Jelley;Deborah M. Powell;Norman G. Johnston

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas N. Jackson
Douglas N. Jackson University of Western Ontario
Sampo V. Paunonen
Sampo V. Paunonen University of Western Ontario
Julie Aitken Schermer
Julie Aitken Schermer University of Western Ontario
John P. Meyer
John P. Meyer University of Western Ontario
Edward Helmes
Edward Helmes James Cook University
James M. Olson
James M. Olson University of Western Ontario
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia
Barbara M. Byrne
Barbara M. Byrne University of Ottawa
Gillian King
Gillian King Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Graham J. Reid
Graham J. Reid University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a wide range of online degrees and pathways, especially in fields like counseling. Many students are looking for flexible and affordable options, and online programs are increasingly meeting that demand.

For those seeking faster credentials, the fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in Texas is a helpful resource. Accelerated programs allow you to launch your career sooner by completing your studies in less time.

Affordability is another top concern. If keeping costs down is important to you, consider researching the cheapest counseling degrees in Arizona. Options are also available on both coasts, such as the cheapest counseling programs in Berkeley and the cheapest counseling programs in Boston.

By choosing a program that fits your budget and schedule, you can prepare for rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, or mental health services. Carefully reviewing your options is the first step toward finding a quality online degree that aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Goffin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles