World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
24248
World Ranking
2131
National Ranking
122

Douglas N. Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas N. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 244 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas N. Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas N. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Social Sciences

Overview

Douglas N. Jackson was affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada during their academic career.

While specific details about their recent research papers, co-authors, publication venues, and subfields of study are not available, Jackson's profile reflects recognition within the academic community through notable honors.

In 1989, Jackson was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in the Academy of Social Sciences.

This fellowship indicates a distinguished standing within the social sciences, although there is no detailed data on fields of study or the main topics addressed in their research.

No records of book publications or collections of papers were found, so further insights into their research contributions from those sources are not present.

Jackson is deceased, and this overview is presented using past tense in acknowledgment of their career legacy.

Best Publications

  • Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts.

    John P. Meyer;Sampo V. Paunonen;Ian R. Gellatly;Richard D. Goffin

  • PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW

    Robert P. Tett;Douglas N. Jackson;Mitchell G. Rothstein

  • Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure.

    Wayne F. Velicer;Douglas N. Jackson

  • A Sequential System for Personality Scale Development

    Douglas N. Jackson

  • Chronic parenting stress: Moderating versus mediating effects of social support.

    Alexandra L. Quittner;Robert L. Glueckauf;Douglas N. Jackson

  • What is beyond the big five? Plenty!

    Sampo V. Paunonen;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Personality Research Form

    Ruth Wessler;Jane Loevinger;D. N. Jackson

  • The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971.

    Douglas N. Jackson

  • Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism, and the Big Five Personality Factors

    Michael C. Ashton;Sampo V. Paunonen;Edward Helmes;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Content and Style in Personality Assessment

    Douglas N. Jackson;Samuel Messick

  • Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some Further Observations

    Wayne F. Velicer;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Genetic and environmental contributions to dimensions of personality disorder.

    W J Livesley;K L Jang;D N Jackson;P A Vernon

  • A leadership self-efficacy taxonomy and its relation to effective leadership ☆

    David W. Anderson;Henryk T. Krajewski;Richard D. Goffin;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class, and race.

    J. Philippe Rushton;C. Davison Ankney

  • The Impact of Faking on Employment Tests: Does Forced Choice Offer a Solution?

    Douglas N. Jackson;Victor R. Wroblewski;Michael C. Ashton

  • Identification of content and style: a two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence.

    P. M. Bentler;Douglas N. Jackson;Samuel Messick

  • A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking.

    Douglas N. Jackson;Larry Hourany;Neil J. Vidmar

  • Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples.

    Unknown

  • Heritability of personality disorder traits: a twin study.

    K. L. Jang;W. J. Livesley;P. A. Vernon;D. N. Jackson

  • Personality organization in cognitive controls and intellectual abilities.

    Riley W. Gardner;Douglas N. Jackson;Samuel J. Messick

  • Salivary Testosterone and Self-Report Aggressive and Pro-Social Personality Characteristics in Men and Women

    Julie Aitken Harris;J. Philippe Rushton;Elizabeth Hampson;Douglas N. Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel Messick
Samuel Messick Princeton University
Sampo V. Paunonen
Sampo V. Paunonen University of Western Ontario
Ronald R. Holden
Ronald R. Holden Queen's University
Edward Helmes
Edward Helmes James Cook University
Richard D. Goffin
Richard D. Goffin University of Western Ontario
Michael C. Ashton
Michael C. Ashton Brock University
John P. Meyer
John P. Meyer University of Western Ontario
J. Philippe Rushton
J. Philippe Rushton University of Western Ontario
Harvey A. Skinner
Harvey A. Skinner York University
Wayne F. Velicer
Wayne F. Velicer University of Rhode Island

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees is a flexible and convenient option for students interested in mental health careers. Today, there is a wide range of accredited online programs, from the best online master’s in counseling programs ranking in Pennsylvania to unique choices tailored for specific states.

Students considering national options can research top online counseling master’s programs in the United States, which often feature flexible schedules and diverse specializations. For those residing in Texas, there are several well-regarded Texas online counseling programs, making professional advancement accessible for individuals throughout the state.

If you prefer a less intensive academic experience, the California easiest counseling programs online can provide a smoother path into the counseling field. With so many online psychology and counseling degree options nationwide, students have the opportunity to build a foundation for careers in clinical practice, school counseling, mental health support, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas N. Jackson

Recently Published Articles