World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5545
World Ranking
9510
National Ranking
550

Edward Helmes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Helmes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edward Helmes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Helmes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward Helmes was affiliated with James Cook University in Australia, where they contributed to research primarily within the field of psychology. Their academic focus encompassed several core areas of psychological study and practice.

The main fields of study for Edward Helmes included:

  • Psychology

Within psychology, Helmes' work extended into specific subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

The topics addressed in their research highlighted several key themes related to personality and psychological assessment. These included:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology

Throughout their career, Edward Helmes collaborated frequently with other researchers, notably coauthoring work with Gregory J. Boyle.

Their publication record did not feature recent papers or book publications as recorded here, nor were specific publication venues prominently linked to their work in the data available.

Best Publications

  • Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism, and the Big Five Personality Factors

    Michael C. Ashton;Sampo V. Paunonen;Edward Helmes;Douglas N. Jackson

  • Standardization and validation of the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES)

    Edward Helmes;Kalman G. Csapo;Judith-ann Short

  • A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology : a critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2

    Edward Helmes;John R. Reddon

  • The construct of alexithymia: associations with defense mechanisms.

    Edward C. Helmes;Pamela D. McNeill;Ronald R. Holden;Chris Jackson

  • The Criterion Validity of Broad Factor Scales versus Specific Facet Scales

    Michael C. Ashton;Douglas N. Jackson;Sampo V. Paunonen;Edward Helmes

  • Neuropsychological correlates of syndromes in schizophrenia.

    Ross M. G. Norman;A. K. Malla;S. L. Morrison-Stewart;E. Helmes

  • Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment

    Richard D. Goffin;Edward Helmes

  • Exploring attitudes toward older workers among Australian employers: an empirical study.

    Eyal Gringart;Edward Helmes;Carig Paul Speelman

  • Problems and solutions in human assessment : honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy

    Douglas Northrop Jackson;Richard D. Goffin;Edward Helmes

  • A Psychometric Investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire

    Edward Helmes

  • Joint Factor Analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five

    Michael C. Ashton;Douglas N. Jackson;Edward Helmes;Sampo V. Paunonen

  • ATTITUDES OF AUSTRALIAN THERAPISTS TOWARD OLDER CLIENTS: EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING IMPERATIVES

    Edward Helmes;Susan Gee

  • EEG coherence and syndromes in schizophrenia.

    R. M. G. Norman;A. K. Malla;P. C. Williamson;S. L. Morrison-Stewart

  • Past and present perceived attitudes of schizophrenics in relation to rehospitalization.

    Brian Baker;Edward Helmes;Shahe S. Kazarian

  • The construct of social desirability: one or two dimensions?

    Edward Helmes;Ronald R Holden

  • A Questionnaire To Evaluate Disability in Osteoporotic Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures

    Edward Helmes;Anthony Hodsman;Darien Lazowski;Asha Bhardwaj

  • Double-blind trial of 2-dimethylaminoethanol in Alzheimer's disease.

    M Fisman;H Mersky;E Helmes

  • Preparing for pain management: a pilot study to enhance engagement.

    Suzanne Habib;Shirley A Morrissey;Edward Helmes

  • The Parental Bonding Instrument: factorial structure.

    Shahe S. Kazarian;Brian Baker;Edward Helmes

  • Age Discrimination in Hiring Practices Against Older Adults in Western Australia : The Case of Accounting Assistants

    Eyal Gringart;Edward Helmes

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxiety symptoms in older adults in residential care.

    Edward Helmes;Bradley G Ward

  • Measures of affect dimensions

    Gregory J. Boyle;Edward Helmes;Gerald Matthews;Carroll E. Izard

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Douglas N. Jackson
Douglas N. Jackson University of Western Ontario
Truls Østbye
Truls Østbye Duke University
Ronald R. Holden
Ronald R. Holden Queen's University
Valsamma Eapen
Valsamma Eapen University of New South Wales
Kate Sofronoff
Kate Sofronoff University of Queensland
Richard D. Goffin
Richard D. Goffin University of Western Ontario
Ashok Malla
Ashok Malla McGill University
Vladimir Hachinski
Vladimir Hachinski University of Western Ontario
Gregory J. Boyle
Gregory J. Boyle University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to various online programs and meaningful career paths, especially in fields like social work. Many students consider advancing their education through flexible online options, leading to roles in clinical practice, advocacy, or community support. These pathways often require state-specific licenses and tailored educational backgrounds.

For instance, if you are wondering how to become a social worker in New Hampshire or how to become a social worker in New Jersey, you’ll need to follow unique state guidelines for licensure and training. Similarly, learning about New Mexico social work license requirements or understanding New York social work education requirements can help you tailor your educational path for optimal success in your chosen state.

As you advance your studies in psychology or related disciplines, researching degree requirements and local licensure processes is crucial. The right online program can set you on a rewarding career path while meeting the evolving demands of the mental health and social services sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Edward Helmes

Recently Published Articles