World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6441 5996 378 369 178 8135

Lee-Fay Low publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lee-Fay Low between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lee-Fay Low published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 36 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications
1999 2025

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lee-Fay Low: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 6
2005 4
2006 6
2007 2
2008 3
2009 12
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 8
2014 12
2015 8
2016 13
2017 8
2018 11
2019 18
2020 12
2021 15
2022 20
2023 18
2024 17
2025 19
Total 246
Download as CSV

Lee-Fay Low publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee-Fay Low sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 178
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lee-Fay Low D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee-Fay Low sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lee-Fay Low is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in health professions, with a particular focus on dementia and cognitive impairment. Their work spans the fields of medicine, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their research primarily addresses topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment research, geriatric care and nursing homes, mental health and patient involvement, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, mental health treatment and access, palliative care and end-of-life issues, and aging and gerontology research.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Negative stereotypes, fear and social distance: a systematic review of depictions of dementia in popular culture in the context of stigma (2020, BMC Geriatrics)
  • Including ethnic minorities in dementia research: Recommendations from a scoping review (2022, Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions)
  • The Effectiveness of Dance Interventions on Psychological and Cognitive Health Outcomes Compared with Other Forms of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis (2024, Sports Medicine)
  • Implementing a Reablement Intervention, "Care of People With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE)": A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study (2020, The Gerontologist)
  • Stakeholders' perspectives on adapting the World Health Organization iSupport for Dementia in Australia (2020, Dementia)

Their frequent co-authors include Yun-Hee Jeon, Henry Brodaty, Kate Laver, Meredith Gresham, and Lyn Phillipson.

Lee-Fay Low has published regularly in a number of venues specializing in dementia and aging, including:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Dementia
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Their multidisciplinary work covers not only clinical and psychological aspects of dementia but also sociological and political dimensions related to caregiving and stigma. The combination of health professions, medicine, and mental health fields highlights the scope and complexity of their research interests.

Best Publications

  • Cholesterol as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline: a systematic review of prospective studies with meta-analysis.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Darren M. Lipnicki;Lee-Fay Low

  • Nursing home staff attitudes towards residents with dementia: strain and satisfaction with work

    Henry Brodaty;Brian Draper;Lee-Fay Low

  • Psychosis, depression and behavioural disturbances in Sydney nursing home residents: prevalence and predictors

    Henry Brodaty;Brian Draper;Dania Saab;Lee-Fay Low

  • A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons.

    Lee-Fay Low;Melvyn W. Yap;Henry Brodaty

  • What Is the Best Dementia Screening Instrument for General Practitioners to Use

    Henry Brodaty;Lee Fay Low;Louisa Gibson;Kim Burns

  • Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a seven-tiered model of service delivery.

    Henry Brodaty;Brian M Draper;Lee-Fay Low

  • Development and Validation of the Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) Questionnaire: Versions for Older Adults and Caregivers

    Emily Reeve;Emily Reeve;Lee-Fay Low;Sepehr Shakib;Sepehr Shakib;Sarah N. Hilmer;Sarah N. Hilmer

  • Dementia literacy: recognition and beliefs on dementia of the Australian Public

    Lee-Fay Low;Kaarin Jane Anstey

  • Normal cognitive changes in aging.

    Kaarin J Anstey;Lee-Fay Low

  • A Systematic Review of Interventions to Change Staff Care Practices in Order to Improve Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes

    Lee-Fay Low;Jennifer Fletcher;Belinda J Goodenough;Belinda J Goodenough;Yun-Hee Jeon

  • Negative stereotypes, fear and social distance: a systematic review of depictions of dementia in popular culture in the context of stigma.

    Lee-Fay Low;Farah Purwaningrum

  • Beliefs and attitudes of older adults and carers about deprescribing of medications: a qualitative focus group study

    Emily Reeve;Lee-Fay Low;Sarah N Hilmer

  • Does personality affect risk for dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lee-Fay Low;Fleur Harrison;Fleur Harrison;Steven M. Lackersteen

  • Characteristics of the GPCOG, a screening tool for cognitive impairment.

    Henry Brodaty;Nicola M. Kemp;Lee-Fay Low

  • Predictors and outcomes for caregivers of people with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic literature review

    Katrin Seeher;Lee-Fay Low;Simone Reppermund;Henry Brodaty

  • The relationship between the quality of the built environment and the quality of life of people with dementia in residential care.

    Richard Fleming;Belinda J Goodenough;Lee-Fay Low;Lynn Chenoweth

  • The Sydney Multisite Intervention of LaughterBosses and ElderClowns (SMILE) study: cluster randomised trial of humour therapy in nursing homes

    Lee-Fay Low;Henry Brodaty;Belinda Goodenough;Peter Spitzer

  • Review of gait, cognition, and fall risks with implications for fall prevention in older adults with dementia

    Weihong Zhang;Weihong Zhang;Lee-Fay Low;Michael Schwenk;Nicholas Mills;Nicholas Mills

  • Attitudes of Older Adults and Caregivers in Australia toward Deprescribing

    Emily Reeve;Emily Reeve;Lee-Fay Low;Sarah N. Hilmer;Sarah N. Hilmer

  • Aggression in the elderly.

    Henry Brodaty;Lee-Fay Low

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Brian Draper
Brian Draper University of New South Wales
Yun-Hee Jeon
Yun-Hee Jeon University of Sydney
Lindy Clemson
Lindy Clemson University of Sydney
Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Sarah N. Hilmer
Sarah N. Hilmer University of Sydney
Daniel William O'Connor
Daniel William O'Connor Monash University
Nicole A. Kochan
Nicole A. Kochan University of New South Wales
Julian N. Trollor
Julian N. Trollor University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online learning and career opportunities in the USA. Aspiring professionals can choose from numerous accredited programs, including bachelor's, master's, and specialized certificates offered remotely by top institutions.

Mental health counseling is a popular pathway, but requirements can vary greatly depending on where you plan to practice. For example, the Louisville mental health counselor education requirements emphasize specific coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, understanding the Lubbock mental health counselor certification requirements is essential for those considering practice in Texas.

If you are looking at Wisconsin, take the time to review what it takes to become a mental health counselor in Madison. Meanwhile, the mental health counselor requirements in Memphis highlight unique state-specific licensing steps.

Before enrolling in an online Psychology program, research the requirements in your state to ensure your chosen degree aligns with your intended career path.

Best Scientists Citing Lee-Fay Low

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles