World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicola T. Lautenschlager

Nicola T. Lautenschlager

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2468 2257 123 119 351 18536

Nicola T. Lautenschlager publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicola T. Lautenschlager between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicola T. Lautenschlager published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 22 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
1994 2025

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicola T. Lautenschlager: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 6
2002 7
2003 8
2004 8
2005 11
2006 9
2007 8
2008 17
2009 23
2010 18
2011 21
2012 22
2013 17
2014 22
2015 17
2016 15
2017 24
2018 22
2019 17
2020 30
2021 26
2022 14
2023 22
2024 11
2025 11
Total 423
Download as CSV

Nicola T. Lautenschlager publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola T. Lautenschlager sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 351 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 351
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicola T. Lautenschlager D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola T. Lautenschlager sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicola T. Lautenschlager is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant body of work in subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, physiology, geriatrics and gerontology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics covered in Lautenschlager's research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Lautenschlager has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably:

  • Kaarin J. Anstey
  • Kathryn A. Ellis
  • Kay L. Cox
  • Terence W.H. Chong
  • Henry Brodaty

Their work has been published repeatedly in specific venues, including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ Open

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lautenschlager include:

  • Heterogeneous aging across multiple organ systems and prediction of chronic disease and mortality, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, 2020, Ageing Research Reviews
  • Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer's disease implies an oligogenic architecture, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Fifteen Years of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study: Progress and Observations from 2,359 Older Adults Spanning the Spectrum from Cognitive Normality to Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
  • Assessment of the DTI-ALPS Parameter Along the Perivascular Space in Older Adults at Risk of Dementia, 2021, Journal of Neuroimaging

Best Publications

  • Effect of physical activity on cognitive function in older adults at risk for Alzheimer disease: a randomized trial.

    Nicola T Lautenschlager;Kay L Cox;Leon Flicker;Jonathan K Foster

  • The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: Methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease

    Kathryn A Ellis;Ashley I Bush;David Darby;Daniela De Fazio

  • Cerebral metabolic changes accompanying conversion of mild cognitive impairment into Alzheimer's disease: a PET follow-up study.

    Alexander Drzezga;Nicola Lautenschlager;Hartwig Siebner;Matthias Riemenschneider

  • Risk of dementia among relatives of Alzheimer's disease patients in the MIRAGE study What is in store for the oldest old?

    N. T. Lautenschlager;L. A. Cupples;V. S. Rao;S. A. Auerbach

  • Prediction of individual clinical outcome in MCI by means of genetic assessment and (18)F-FDG PET.

    Alexander Drzezga;Timo Grimmer;Matthias Riemenschneider;Nicola Lautenschlager

  • Long-term effects of childhood abuse on the quality of life and health of older people : results from the Depression and early prevention of suicide in general practice project

    Brian Draper;Jon J Pfaff;Jane E Pirkis;John Snowdon

  • Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease implies an oligogenic architecture

    Qian Zhang;Julia Sidorenko;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Riccardo E. Marioni

  • Effect of amyloid on memory and non-memory decline from preclinical to clinical Alzheimer's disease

    Yen Ying Lim;Paul Thomas Maruff;Robert H. Pietrzak;David Ames

  • Factors associated with suicidal thoughts in a large community study of older adults

    Osvaldo P Almeida;Brian Draper;John Snowdon;Nicola T Lautenschlager

  • Amyloid-β, Anxiety, and Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study

    Robert H. Pietrzak;Robert H. Pietrzak;Yen Ying Lim;Yen Ying Lim;Alexander Neumeister;David Ames;David Ames

  • Subjective memory decline predicts greater rates of clinical progression in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Rachel F. Buckley;Paul Maruff;David Ames;Pierrick Bourgeat

  • Tau and Aβ42 protein in CSF of patients with frontotemporal degeneration

    M. Riemenschneider;S. Wagenpfeil;J. Diehl;Nicola Lautenschlager

  • Association Between Lifestyle Factors and Mental Health Measures Among Community-Dwelling Older Women:

    Kellie Cassidy;Ria Kotynia-English;John Acres;Leon Flicker

  • High prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians

    Kate Smith;Leon Flicker;Nicola Lautenschlager;Osvaldo Almeida

  • Falls, depression and antidepressants in later life: a large primary care appraisal

    Ngaire Kerse;Leon Flicker;Jon J. Pfaff;Brian Draper

  • The influence of exercise on brain aging and dementia.

    Nicola T. Lautenschlager;Kay Cox;Elizabeth V. Cyarto

  • Bone mineral density, adiposity, and cognitive functions

    Hamid R. Sohrabi;Hamid R. Sohrabi;Kristyn A. Bates;Michael Weinborn;Romola S. Bucks

  • Feasibility, safety and preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a home-based exercise programme for older people with Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial

    Plaiwan Suttanon;Keith D Hill;Catherine M Said;Susan B Williams

  • Factors affecting subjective memory complaints in the AIBL aging study: biomarkers, memory, affect, and age.

    R. Buckley;M.M. Saling;D.J. Ames;C.C. Rowe

  • Effect of Physical Activity on Cognitive Function in Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer DiseaseA Randomized Trial

    Nicola T. Lautenschlager

Frequent Co-Authors

Osvaldo P. Almeida
Osvaldo P. Almeida University of Western Australia
Leon Flicker
Leon Flicker University of Western Australia
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne
Kathryn A. Ellis
Kathryn A. Ellis University of Melbourne
Ralph N. Martins
Ralph N. Martins Edith Cowan University
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Cassandra Szoeke
Cassandra Szoeke University of Melbourne
Jonathan K. Foster
Jonathan K. Foster Curtin University
Kevin Taddei
Kevin Taddei Edith Cowan University
Christopher C. Rowe
Christopher C. Rowe University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens many pathways beyond traditional counseling roles. One popular career option is social work, which often partners closely with psychological practice. For those interested in this field, obtaining the appropriate qualifications is essential—requirements differ by state and usually include a degree, supervised experience, and licensure.

If you are considering working in Maine, it’s important to review the Maine social work education requirements to ensure you’re meeting all necessary criteria for practice. Those planning to enter the field in Maryland should explore how to become a social worker in Maryland. The steps often include specialized coursework and state-specific exams.

Similarly, understanding the detailed process of becoming a social worker in Massachusetts or becoming a social worker in Michigan can help you plan your academic and licensing journey effectively. Many universities now offer online degrees that meet these diverse requirements, allowing for flexibility and accessibility as you prepare for a fulfilling career in social work or psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Nicola T. Lautenschlager

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles