World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6548
World Ranking
8745
National Ranking
3706

Katherine Kalil publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine Kalil sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Katherine Kalil D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine Kalil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine Kalil is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The academic profile indicates an active position within this institution, though no specific details on departmental affiliation or research group are provided.

There are no listed recent papers or publications attributed to Katherine Kalil, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or regular publication venues associated with their work. This absence of published articles in the available data suggests that publicly accessible research outputs may be limited or not documented in this particular dataset.

Similarly, no book publications or details about publishers related to their authored works are recorded.

The data does not specify any main fields of study or subfields associated with Katherine Kalil. Consequently, no specialization areas or research concentrations can be identified from the available information.

There is no information on main research topics or themes connected to their scholarly activities.

Additionally, there are no awards or honors listed, indicating either the lack of such recognitions or the absence of documented award data for this person.

Best Publications

  • Axon branching requires interactions between dynamic microtubules and actin filaments.

    Erik W. Dent;Katherine Kalil

  • Netrin-1 and semaphorin 3A promote or inhibit cortical axon branching, respectively, by reorganization of the cytoskeleton.

    Erik W. Dent;Aileen M. Barnes;Fangjun Tang;Katherine Kalil

  • Reorganization and movement of microtubules in axonal growth cones and developing interstitial branches.

    Erik W. Dent;John L. Callaway;Györgyi Szebenyi;Peter W. Baas

  • Branch management: mechanisms of axon branching in the developing vertebrate CNS

    Katherine Kalil;Erik W. Dent

  • Projections of the cerebellar and dorsal column nuclei upon the thalamus of the rhesus monkey.

    Katherine Kalil

  • Touch and go: guidance cues signal to the growth cone cytoskeleton.

    Katherine Kalil;Erik W Dent

  • Regrowth of severed axons in the neonatal central nervous system: establishment of normal connections

    Katherine Kalil;Thomas Reh

  • Common mechanisms underlying growth cone guidance and axon branching.

    Katherine Kalil;Gyorgyi Szebenyi;Erik W. Dent

  • A light and electron microscopic study of regrowing pyramidal tract fibers

    Katherine Kalil;Thomas Reh

  • Dynamic behaviors of growth cones extending in the corpus callosum of living cortical brain slices observed with video microscopy

    Mary C. Halloran;Katherine Kalil

  • Guidance of callosal axons by radial glia in the developing cerebral cortex

    CR Norris;K Kalil

  • Elevated synthesis of an axonally transported protein correlates with axon outgrowth in normal and injured pyramidal tracts

    Unknown

  • Wnt5a Induces Simultaneous Cortical Axon Outgrowth and Repulsive Axon Guidance through Distinct Signaling Mechanisms

    Li Li;B. Ian Hutchins;Katherine Kalil

  • Netrin-1 induces axon branching in developing cortical neurons by frequency-dependent calcium signaling pathways.

    Fangjun Tang;Katherine Kalil

  • Development of the pyramidal tract in the hamster. I. A light microscopic study

    Thomas Reh;Katherine Kalil

  • Spontaneous Calcium Transients in Developing Cortical Neurons Regulate Axon Outgrowth

    Fangjun Tang;Erik W. Dent;Katherine Kalil

  • Patch-like termination of thalamic fibers in the putamen of the rhesus monkey: an autoradiographic study

    Katherine Kalil

  • Interstitial Branches Develop from Active Regions of the Axon Demarcated by the Primary Growth Cone during Pausing Behaviors

    Györgyi Szebenyi;John L. Callaway;Erik W. Dent;Katherine Kalil

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Promotes Axon Branching of Cortical Neurons by Influencing Morphology and Behavior of the Primary Growth Cone

    Györgyi Szebenyi;Erik W. Dent;John L. Callaway;Chad Seys

  • Axon Guidance by Growth Cones and Branches: Common Cytoskeletal and Signaling Mechanisms

    Erik W. Dent;Fangjun Tang;Katherine Kalil

  • Specificity of corticospinal axon arbors sprouting into denervated contralateral spinal cord.

    Rong Zhen Kuang;Katherine Kalil

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Reh
Thomas A. Reh University of Washington
Peter W. Baas
Peter W. Baas Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, related online degree programs can broaden your opportunities in mental health, research, and counseling. Affordable and flexible education options are now widely available, enabling students to access reputable programs without relocating or accumulating heavy debt.

For those interested in therapy, counseling, or public health, an msw online (Master of Social Work) program is a popular path. These programs can prepare you for social work licensure and direct patient care roles. If your interest lies in clinical psychology, seeking out the cheapest psyd programs can open doors to careers as a psychologist without unnecessary student debt.

Students looking for affordable foundational programs should explore the cheapest psychology degree online options, ideal for building a base in human behavior and brain science. If your goal involves family therapy, you might consider enrolling in an online lmft program (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) to speed up your path to licensure. Each of these options provides a unique pathway into neuroscience-related careers, with flexibility and accessibility for today’s students.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine Kalil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles