World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
7727
World Ranking
4997
National Ranking
2236

George F. Martin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Martin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 153 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

George F. Martin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

George F. Martin is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their professional focus and academic contributions are connected to this institution.

No specific papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues have been recorded in available data for George F. Martin. Similarly, there are no listed book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study associated with their work.

The data does not include particular research topics, awards, or other distinctions. There is no recorded information about any publications or collaborations typically used to map a scholar's research profile.

Since the dataset is limited to basic affiliation details, the profile reflects an early stage or less widely documented academic footprint. Further information regarding their research contributions or areas of expertise is not currently available.

Best Publications

  • Anterograde degeneration study of the superior colliculus in Tupaia glis: Evidence for a subdivision between superficial and deep layers

    J. K. Harting;W. C. Hall;I. T. Diamond;G. F. Martin

  • Autoradiographic analysis of ascending projections from the pontine and mesencephalic reticular formation and the median raphe nucleus in the rat.

    Robert P. Vertes;George F. Martin

  • Superior Colliculus of the Tree Shrew: A Structural and Functional Subdivision into Superficial and Deep Layers

    V. A. Casagrande;J. K. Harting;W. C. Hall;I. T. Diamond

  • Spinal projections from the mesencephalic and pontine reticular formation in the North American Opossum: a study using axonal transport techniques.

    George F. Martin;A. O. Humbertson;L. C. Laxson;W. M. Panneton

  • Efferent tectal pathways of the opossum (Didelphis virginiana)

    George F. Martin

  • A neuroanatomical analysis of spinal cord injury in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

    Jacqueline C. Bresnahan;James S. King;George F. Martin;David Yashon

  • Spinal projections of the gigantocellular reticular formation in the rat. Evidence for projections from different areas to laminae I and II and lamina IX.

    G. F. Martin;R. P. Vertes;R. Waltzer

  • Spinal projections from the medullary reticular formation of the North American opossum: Evidence for connectional heterogeneity

    G. F. Martin;T. Cabana;A. O. Humbertson;L. C. Laxson

  • An autoradiographic analysis of ascending projections from the medullary reticular formation in the rat

    R.P. Vertes;G.F. Martin;R. Waltzer

  • Spino-bulbar, spino-thalamic and medial lemniscal connections in the american opossum, Didelphis marsupialis virginiana

    James C. Hazlett;Richard Dom;George F. Martin

  • Cerebello-olivary fibers: their origin, course and distribution in the North American opossum.

    G. F. Martin;C. K. Henkel;J. S. King

  • The origin of brainstem-spinal pathways in the North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Studies using the horseradish peroxidase method.

    Keith A. Crutcher;Albert O. Humbertson;George F. Martin

  • Developmental sequence in the origin of descending spinal pathways. Studies using retrograde transport techniques in the North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana).

    T. Cabana;G.F. Martin

  • A developmental study of substance-P, somatostatin, enkephalin, and serotonin immunoreactive elements in the spinal cord of the North American opossum.

    F. J. DiTirro;G. F. Martin;R. H. Ho

  • Brainstem projections to the facial nucleus of the opossum. A study using axonal transport techniques

    W.M. Panneton;G.F. Martin

  • Evidence for direct bulbospinal projections to laminae IX, X and the intermediolateral cell column. Studies using axonal transport techniques in the North American opossum.

    G.F. Martin;A.O. Humbertson;C. Laxson;W.M. Panneton

  • Evidence for two direct cerebello-olivary connections.

    R. Dom;J.S. King;G.F. Martin

  • An experimental light and electron microscopic study of cerebellorubral projections in the opossum, Didelphis marsupialis virginiana

    James S. King;Richard M. Dom;Jacqueline B. Conner;George F. Martin

  • The precise origin of the tectospinal pathway in three common laboratory animals : A study using the horseradish peroxidase method

    J.T. Weber;G.F. Martin;M. Behan;M.F. Huerta

  • A light and electron microscopic study of corticorubral projections in the opossum, Didelphis marsupialis virginiana.

    James S. King;George F. Martin;Jacqueline B. Conner

  • Neocortical Development Bayer, S.A. and Altman, J. (Eds.), 255 pp. Raven Press, New York, 1991. $129.00

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

James S. King
James S. King The Ohio State University
Xiao Ming Xu
Xiao Ming Xu Indiana University
Robert P. Vertes
Robert P. Vertes Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences
Ichiro Fujita
Ichiro Fujita Osaka University
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan University of California, San Francisco
Albert M. Galaburda
Albert M. Galaburda Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Hans J. Markowitsch
Hans J. Markowitsch Bielefeld University
Keith A. Crutcher
Keith A. Crutcher University of Cincinnati
Mario F. Wullimann
Mario F. Wullimann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Walter Wilczynski
Walter Wilczynski Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing George F. Martin

Recently Published Articles