World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
82
Citations
31005
World Ranking
1492
National Ranking
743

Albert M. Galaburda publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert M. Galaburda sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 244 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Albert M. Galaburda D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert M. Galaburda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert M. Galaburda is affiliated with the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional areas of study include Molecular Biology, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their scientific output addresses numerous topics, notably:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Color perception and design
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care

Galaburda's recent papers include:

  • "Shape-centered representations of bounded regions of space mediate the perception of objects," 2021, Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • "The form of reference frames in vision: The case of intermediate shape-centered representations," 2021, Neuropsychologia
  • "Maternal exposure to a high-magnitude earthquake during pregnancy influences pre-reading skills in early childhood," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Trans-trigeminal transport of masseter-derived neprilysin to hippocampus," 2020, Archives of Oral Biology
  • "Animal models of developmental dyslexia," 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience

The venues where Galaburda has frequently published include:

  • Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Archives of Oral Biology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Colleagues who have coauthored multiple works with Galaburda include:

  • Gilles Vannuscorps
  • Alfonso Caramazza
  • Luis Federico Bátiz
  • Yasna Palmeiro-Silva
  • Gregory E. Rice

Best Publications

  • Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and a program for research.

    Norman Geschwind;Albert M. Galaburda

  • The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient

    Hanna Damasio;Thomas Grabowski;Randall Frank;Albert M. Galaburda

  • Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies

    Albert M. Galaburda;Gordon F. Sherman;Glenn D. Rosen;Francisco Aboitiz

  • Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia

    Margaret S. Livingstone;Glenn D. Rosen;Frank W. Drislane;Albert M. Galaburda

  • Right-left asymmetrics in the brain

    Albert M. Galaburda;Marjorie LeMay;Thomas L. Kemper;Norman Geschwind

  • Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex.

    Albert Galaburda;Friedrich Sanides

  • Topographical Variation of the Human Primary Cortices: Implications for Neuroimaging, Brain Mapping, and Neurobiology

    J. Rademacher;V. S. Caviness;H. Steinmetz;A. M. Galaburda

  • Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: A case study

    Albert M. Galaburda;Thomas L. Kemper

  • Human Brain: Cytoarchitectonic Left-Right Asymmetries in the Temporal Speech Region

    Albert M. Galaburda;Friedrich Sanides;Norman Geschwind

  • Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia.

    Albert M. Galaburda;Matthew T. Menard;Glenn D. Rosen

  • Human cerebral cortex: Localization, parcellation, and morphometry with magnetic resonance imaging

    J. Rademacher;J. Rademacher;A. M. Galaburda;D. N. Kennedy;P. A. Filipek

  • Developmental dyslexia in women: neuropathological findings in three patients.

    Peter Humphreys;Peter Humphreys;Walter E. Kaufmann;Walter E. Kaufmann;Albert M. Galaburda;Albert M. Galaburda

  • Bridging cognition, the brain and molecular genetics: evidence from Williams syndrome.

    Ursula Bellugi;Liz Lichtenberger;Debra Mills;Albert Galaburda

  • Planum temporale asymmetry reappraisal since geschwind and levitsky

    Albert M. Galaburda;Joan Corsiglia;Glenn D. Rosen;Gordon F. Sherman

  • From genes to behavior in developmental dyslexia

    Albert M Galaburda;Joseph LoTurco;Franck Ramus;R Holly Fitch

  • Evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia.

    Albert Galaburda;Albert Galaburda;Albert Galaburda;Margaret Livingstone;Margaret Livingstone

  • The intrinsic architectonic and connectional organization of the superior temporal region of the rhesus monkey

    Albert M. Galaburda;Albert M. Galaburda;Deepak N. Pandya;Deepak N. Pandya

  • Cerebral dominance : the biological foundations

    Albert M. Galaburda;Norman Geschwind

  • Inferior Parietal Lobule: Divergent Architectonic Asymmetries in the Human Brain

    David Eidelberg;Albert M. Galaburda

  • Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome.

    Paul M. Thompson;Agatha D. Lee;Rebecca A. Dutton;Jennifer A. Geaga

  • Individual variability in cortical organization: its relationship to brain laterality and implications to function

    Albert M. Galaburda;Glenn D. Rosen;Glenn D. Rosen;Gordon F. Sherman;Gordon F. Sherman

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn D. Rosen
Glenn D. Rosen Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gordon F. Sherman
Gordon F. Sherman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ursula Bellugi
Ursula Bellugi Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Debra L. Mills
Debra L. Mills Bangor University
Julie R. Korenberg
Julie R. Korenberg University of Utah
Victor H. Denenberg
Victor H. Denenberg University of Connecticut
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Arthur W. Toga
Arthur W. Toga University of Southern California
Mark A. Eckert
Mark A. Eckert Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens up a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways in related fields. For those interested in supporting individuals and communities, accelerated social work programs offer a fast track to earning a Master of Social Work. These programs are ideal for students seeking a blend of scientific knowledge and social impact.

If your interests lean toward behavior and mental processes, accelerated psychology programs provide a flexible, online alternative, helping you enter or advance in fields such as research, education, and therapy.

For those considering counseling, you can explore cacrep accredited online counseling programs that meet rigorous standards for quality and licensure. Bachelor's degree seekers may also benefit from affordable counseling bachelor's degree online options, laying a strong foundation for a career in mental health.

These related degrees can complement or enrich your neuroscience background, offering additional pathways to careers in healthcare, research, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Albert M. Galaburda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles