World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
6130
World Ranking
10425
National Ranking
1021

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
6174
World Ranking
9419
National Ranking
696

Debra L. Mills publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debra L. Mills sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Debra L. Mills D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debra L. Mills sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Debra L. Mills is affiliated with Bangor University in the United Kingdom and has contributed to the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work spans various subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research explores multiple topics, notably Language Development and Disorders, Reading and Literacy Development, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Williams Syndrome Research, Congenital Heart Defects Research, Coronary Artery Anomalies, and Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms.

Mills has published articles in several scientific venues, with papers appearing in Frontiers in Psychology, Scientific Reports, and i-Perception. Some of the recent works include:

  • Development of the N400 for Word Learning in the First 2 Years of Life: A Systematic Review (2021) in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Brain lateralization for perceiving direction of motion is reversed in Williams syndrome and related to BUD23 (2025) in Scientific Reports
  • Three-dimensional shape from shading is modulated by top-down attention: Evidence from event-related potentials (2025) in i-Perception

Collaboration with other researchers plays a role in Mills' work, frequently coauthoring with Caroline Junge, Marlijne Boumeester, Mariella Paul, Samuel H. Cosper, and Li Dai.

Best Publications

  • Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods

    Helen J. Neville;Debra L. Mills;Donald S. Lawson

  • Bridging cognition, the brain and molecular genetics: evidence from Williams syndrome.

    Ursula Bellugi;Liz Lichtenberger;Debra Mills;Albert Galaburda

  • Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months

    Debra L. Mills;Sharon Coffey‐Corina;Helen J. Neville

  • Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome.

    Paul M. Thompson;Agatha D. Lee;Rebecca A. Dutton;Jennifer A. Geaga

  • More Is Not Always Better: Increased Fractional Anisotropy of Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus Associated with Poor Visuospatial Abilities in Williams Syndrome

    Fumiko Hoeft;Naama Barnea-Goraly;Brian W. Haas;Golijeh Golarai

  • Language acquisition and cerebral specialization in 20-month-old infants

    Debra L. Mills;Sharon A. Coffey-Corina;Helen J. Neville

  • Two languages, one developing brain: event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers

    Barbara T. Conboy;Debra L. Mills;Debra L. Mills

  • Defining the social phenotype in Williams syndrome: a model for linking gene, the brain, and behavior.

    Anna Järvinen-Pasley;Ursula Bellugi;Judy Reilly;Debra L. Mills

  • Language Experience and the Organization of Brain Activity to Phonetically Similar Words: ERP Evidence from 14- and 20-Month-Olds

    Debra L. Mills;Chantel Prat;Renate Zangl;Christine L. Stager

  • III. Electrophysiological Studies of Face Processing in Williams Syndrome

    Debra L. Mills;Twyla D. Alvarez;Marie St. George;Lawrence G. Appelbaum

  • 3D pattern of brain abnormalities in Williams syndrome visualized using tensor-based morphometry.

    Ming Chang Chiang;Allan L. Reiss;Agatha D. Lee;Ursula Bellugi

  • Increased local gyrification mapped in Williams syndrome.

    Christian Gaser;Eileen Luders;Paul M. Thompson;Agatha D. Lee

  • Watching the Infant Brain Learn Words: Effects of Vocabulary Size and Experience.

    Debra L. Mills;Kim Plunkett;Chantel Prat;Graham Schafer

  • Genetic influences on sociability: heightened amygdala reactivity and event-related responses to positive social stimuli in Williams syndrome.

    Brian W. Haas;Debra Mills;Anna Yam;Fumiko Hoeft

  • Is it Williams syndrome? GTF2IRD1 implicated in visual–spatial construction and GTF2I in sociability revealed by high resolution arrays

    L. Dai;L. Dai;U. Bellugi;X. N. Chen;A. M. Pulst-Korenberg

  • Increased brain activity to infant-directed speech in 6-and 13-month-old infants.

    Renate Zangl;Debra L. Mills

  • Frontostriatal Dysfunction During Response Inhibition in Williams Syndrome

    Dean Mobbs;Mark A. Eckert;Debra Mills;Julie Korenberg

  • Evidence for superior parietal impairment in Williams syndrome

    M. A. Eckert;D. Hu;S. Eliez;U. Bellugi

  • Developmental changes in neural activity to familiar words and gestures

    Elizabeth A. Sheehan;Laura L. Namy;Debra L. Mills

  • Effects of altered auditory sensitivity and age of language acquisition on the development of language-relevant neural systems: Preliminary studies of Williams syndrome.

    Helen J. Neville;Debra L. Mills;Ursula Bellugi

Frequent Co-Authors

Ursula Bellugi
Ursula Bellugi Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Julie R. Korenberg
Julie R. Korenberg University of Utah
Albert M. Galaburda
Albert M. Galaburda Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Helen J. Neville
Helen J. Neville University of Oregon
Fumiko Hoeft
Fumiko Hoeft University of Connecticut
Brian W. Haas
Brian W. Haas University of Georgia
Mark A. Eckert
Mark A. Eckert Medical University of South Carolina
Masaru Mimura
Masaru Mimura Keio University
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers in mental health, research, and counseling. For students considering alternative or supplementary fields, online programs offer convenience and flexibility to fit different lifestyles and career goals.

Many prospective students ask, how much is a psychology degree? Tuition can vary, but there are affordable online options that provide strong foundations in psychological science. This pathway often leads to careers in counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Those interested in social services may explore masters in social work online programs. These programs prepare students for roles in social work, advocacy, and clinical practice, and some are designed for easier admissions.

For advanced clinical roles, look into psyd programs usa. These doctoral-level programs emphasize practical training in psychology and often lead to licensure for clinical practice.

Additionally, aspiring marriage and family therapists can benefit from online mft programs. These degree tracks focus on therapeutic skills to support families and couples.

Each of these online degrees offers unique opportunities and specialized career pathways related to neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Debra L. Mills

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles