World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Adriana Sampaio

Adriana Sampaio

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10986 10283 25 25 139 3643

Adriana Sampaio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adriana Sampaio between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adriana Sampaio published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2025. 63 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2025. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 37 publications
2005 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adriana Sampaio: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 7
2011 10
2012 9
2013 15
2014 9
2015 11
2016 9
2017 10
2018 10
2019 12
2020 13
2021 13
2022 21
2023 16
2024 26
2025 37
Total 237
Download as CSV

Adriana Sampaio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adriana Sampaio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adriana Sampaio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adriana Sampaio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Adriana Sampaio is affiliated with the University of Minho in Portugal and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans various subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Autism spectrum disorder research
  • Action observation and synchronization
  • Tactile and sensory interactions
  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Social Camouflaging in Females with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review (2020) published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Is There a Bias Towards Males in the Diagnosis of Autism? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) published in Neuropsychology Review
  • Executive Functioning: A Mediator Between Sensory Processing and Behaviour in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2020) published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Electroencephalographic Signatures of the Binge Drinking Pattern During Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review (2020) published in NeuroImage Clinical
  • Telephone-based Psychological Crisis Intervention: The Portuguese Experience with COVID-19 (2020) published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Sampaio frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Alberto Crego, Sara Cruz, Eduardo López-Caneda, Natália Almeida-Antunes, and Diego Pinal. These coauthor collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications.

Sampaio's work has been published in several recurring academic venues, reflecting the breadth of research interests. Notable publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Best Publications

  • A Hitchhiker's Guide to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    José Miguel Montenegro Soares;Ricardo José Silva Magalhães;Pedro Miguel Silva Moreira;Alexandre Sousa

  • Default mode network dissociation in depressive and anxiety states

    Joana Fernandes Coutinho;Sara Veiga Fernandesl;José Miguel Soares;Liliana Maia

  • Stress-induced changes in human decision-making are reversible

    José Miguel Soares;Adriana Sampaio;Adriana Sampaio;Luís Miguel Ferreira;N. C. Santos

  • Stress Impact on Resting State Brain Networks.

    José Miguel Soares;Adriana Sampaio;Adriana Sampaio;Luís Miguel Ferreira;Nadine Correia Santos

  • Social Camouflaging in Females with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

    María Tubío-Fungueiriño;Sara Cruz;Adriana Sampaio;Angel Carracedo

  • Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance.

    Jorge Leite;Sandra Carvalho;Santiago Galdo-Alvarez;Jorge Alves

  • The Big Five default brain: functional evidence

    Adriana Sampaio;José Miguel Soares;Joana Coutinho;Nuno Sousa

  • Non-pharmacological cognitive intervention for aging and dementia: Current perspectives.

    Jorge Alves;Rosana Magalhães;Álvaro Machado;Óscar F Gonçalves

  • Mood is a key determinant of cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis

    Nadine Correia Santos;Patrício Soares Costa;Pedro Miguel Guimarães Marques da Cunha;Jorge Cotter

  • Is there evidence for cognitive intervention in Alzheimer disease? A systematic review of efficacy, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness

    Jorge Alves;Rosana Magalhães;Roger E Thomas;Oscar F Gonçalves

  • Reviewing working memory training gains in healthy older adults: A meta-analytic review of transfer for cognitive outcomes

    Ana C. Teixeira-Santos;Célia S. Moreira;Rosana Magalhães;Carina Magalhães

  • Memory abilities in Williams syndrome: dissociation or developmental delay hypothesis?

    Adriana Sampaio;Nuno Sousa;Montse Férnandez;Margarida Rangel Henriques

  • Brain mechanisms for processing discriminative and affective touch in 7-month-old infants.

    Helga O. Miguel;Isabel C. Lisboa;Óscar F. Gonçalves;Óscar F. Gonçalves;Adriana Sampaio

  • Executive Functioning: A Mediator Between Sensory Processing and Behaviour in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Montse Fernandez-Prieto;Célia Moreira;Sara Cruz;Vânia Campos

  • Patterns of Default Mode Network Deactivation in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

    Óscar F. Gonçalves;José Miguel Soares;Sandra Carvalho;Sandra Carvalho;Jorge Leite;Jorge Leite

  • Brain correlates of pro-social personality traits: a voxel-based morphometry study

    Joana Coutinho;Adriana Sampaio;Miguel Ferreira;José Miguel Soares

  • Cognitive and emotional impairments in obsessive–compulsive disorder: Evidence from functional brain alterations

    Óscar F. Gonçalves;Sandra Carvalho;Sandra Carvalho;Jorge Leite;Jorge Leite;Ana Fernandes-Gonçalves

  • Abnormal processing of emotional prosody in Williams syndrome: an event-related potentials study.

    Ana P. Pinheiro;Santiago Galdo-Álvarez;Andréia Schurt Rauber;Adriana Sampaio

  • Obsessive–compulsive disorder as a visual processing impairment

    Óscar Filipe Coelho Neves Gonçalves;Tiago Reis Marques;N.F. Lori;A. Sampaio

  • Touch Processing and Social Behavior in ASD

    Helga O. Miguel;Adriana Sampaio;Rocío Martínez-Regueiro;Lorena Gómez-Guerrero

  • Plasticity of resting state brain networks in recovery from stress

    Jose Miguel Soares;Adriana Sampaio;Adriana Sampaio;Paulo Marques;Luis Miguel Ferreira

  • Cognitive stimulation for Portuguese older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy, comparative duration, feasibility, and experiential relevance.

    Jorge Alves;Filipa Alves-Costa;Rosana Magalhães;Óscar F. Gonçalves

Frequent Co-Authors

Óscar F. Gonçalves
Óscar F. Gonçalves University of Coimbra
Angel Carracedo
Angel Carracedo University of Santiago de Compostela
Nuno Sousa
Nuno Sousa Centro Universitario Max Planck
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
João José Cerqueira
João José Cerqueira University of Minho
Fernanda Marques
Fernanda Marques University of Minho
Pedro Rosário
Pedro Rosário University of Minho
Bárbara Figueiredo
Bárbara Figueiredo University of Minho
Paulo P. P. Machado
Paulo P. P. Machado University of Minho

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer flexible pathways for students aiming to enter fields like counseling, social work, human resources, or research. With many universities expanding their virtual offerings, it’s easier than ever to access quality programs from almost anywhere in the country. Choosing the right program is crucial, with factors such as faculty expertise, research opportunities, and local specialization all playing a role in future career prospects.

To help students make informed decisions, rankings can provide useful insights. For instance, the best psychology program rankings in Reno highlight top options available in Nevada. Students interested in other regions can explore resources like the best psychology program rankings in South Dakota and the best psychology degree rankings in Shreveport. For a comprehensive national overview, see the best psychology degree rankings in the US.

Completing an online psychology degree can lead to diverse career paths in mental health services, education, business, or specialized research roles, offering strong prospects for growth in both traditional and emerging fields.

Best Scientists Citing Adriana Sampaio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles