World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
16972
World Ranking
3479
National Ranking
1607

Mark A. Eckert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Eckert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark A. Eckert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Eckert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Eckert is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a notable emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and sensory systems. The scope of their work extends into subfields such as developmental and educational psychology, speech and hearing, and neurology.

The scientist's research addresses multiple topics centered around hearing and sensory function. These main topics include:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Mark A. Eckert has published in leading venues related to neuroscience and neuroimaging. Frequent publication venues are:

  • NeuroImage
  • Brain Structure and Function
  • International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology

Their recent papers include:

  • Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease (2020, Hearing Research)
  • The Stria Vascularis in Mice and Humans Is an Early Site of Age-Related Cochlear Degeneration, Macrophage Dysfunction, and Inflammation (2023, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss (2022, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology)
  • Longitudinal change in ventricular volume is accelerated in astronauts undergoing long-duration spaceflight (2021, Aging Brain)
  • Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise (2022, NeuroImage)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors in their field. Regular coauthors include:

  • Kenneth I. Vaden
  • Judy R. Dubno
  • Rodney J. Schlosser
  • Lois J. Matthews
  • James Z. Wang

Best Publications

  • Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Sophia E. Kramer;Mark A. Eckert;Brent Edwards

  • White Matter Development During Childhood and Adolescence: A Cross-sectional Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

    Naama Barnea-Goraly;Vinod Menon;Mark Eckert;Leanne Tamm

  • Developmental Changes in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence for Increased Functional Specialization in the Left Inferior Parietal Cortex

    S.M. Rivera;A.L. Reiss;M.A. Eckert;V. Menon

  • Anatomical correlates of dyslexia: frontal and cerebellar findings.

    Mark A. Eckert;Christiana M. Leonard;Todd L. Richards;Elizabeth H. Aylward

  • At the heart of the ventral attention system: the right anterior insula.

    Mark A. Eckert;Vinod Menon;Adam Walczak;Jayne Ahlstrom

  • Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome.

    Paul M. Thompson;Agatha D. Lee;Rebecca A. Dutton;Jennifer A. Geaga

  • In-Vivo Mapping of the Human Locus Coeruleus

    Noam I. Keren;Carl T. Lozar;Kelly C. Harris;Paul S. Morgan;Paul S. Morgan

  • An Experiment of Nature: Brain Anatomy Parallels Cognition and Behavior in Williams Syndrome

    Allan L. Reiss;Mark A. Eckert;Fredric E. Rose;Asya Karchemskiy

  • Anatomical risk factors for phonological dyslexia.

    Christiana M. Leonard;Mark A. Eckert;Linda J. Lombardino;Thomas Oakland

  • Neuroanatomical Markers for Dyslexia: A Review of Dyslexia Structural Imaging Studies

    Mark Eckert

  • Size matters: cerebral volume influences sex differences in neuroanatomy.

    Christiana M. Leonard;Stephen Towler;Suzanne Welcome;Laura K. Halderman

  • Neuroanatomy of Fragile X Syndrome Is Associated with Aberrant Behavior and the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP)

    Doron Gothelf;Joyce A. Furfaro;Fumiko Hoeft;Mark A. Eckert

  • Classifying Human Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss from Animal Models

    Judy R. Dubno;Mark A. Eckert;Fu-Shing Lee;Lois J. Matthews

  • Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of mesenchymal stromal cells for ischemic stroke

    Quynh Vu;Kate Xie;Mark Eckert;Weian Zhao

  • Age-Related Changes in Processing Speed: Unique Contributions of Cerebellar and Prefrontal Cortex

    Mark A. Eckert;Noam I. Keren;Donna R. Roberts;Vince D. Calhoun

  • Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

    Stefanie E. Kuchinsky;Jayne B. Ahlstrom;Kenneth I. Vaden;Stephanie L. Cute

  • Auditory Cortex Signs of Age-Related Hearing Loss

    Mark A. Eckert;Stephanie L. Cute;Kenneth I. Vaden;Stefanie E. Kuchinsky

  • Histologic validation of locus coeruleus MRI contrast in post-mortem tissue.

    Noam I. Keren;Saeid Taheri;Elena M. Vazey;Paul S. Morgan

  • Slowing Down: Age-Related Neurobiological Predictors of Processing Speed

    Mark A Eckert

  • Anatomical signatures of dyslexia in children: unique information from manual and voxel based morphometry brain measures.

    Mark A. Eckert;Christiana M. Leonard;Marko Wilke;Mathew Eckert

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Lengyel
Ernst Lengyel University of Chicago
Christiana M. Leonard
Christiana M. Leonard University of Florida
Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Albert M. Galaburda
Albert M. Galaburda Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ursula Bellugi
Ursula Bellugi Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Julie R. Korenberg
Julie R. Korenberg University of Utah
Debra L. Mills
Debra L. Mills Bangor University
Virginia W. Berninger
Virginia W. Berninger University of Washington
Matthias Mann
Matthias Mann Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
Chris Rorden
Chris Rorden University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Eckert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles