World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
8212
World Ranking
4143
National Ranking
1973

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
7109
World Ranking
7269
National Ranking
1985

Mark A. Pitt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark A. Pitt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Pitt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Pitt is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience and computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, materials chemistry, statistics and probability, and general decision sciences.

Their research addresses a range of main topics, such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, decision-making and behavioral economics, machine learning in materials science, behavioral health and interventions, advanced multi-objective optimization algorithms, carbon nanotubes in composites, and Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference.

Mark A. Pitt has published frequently in several academic venues, with notable contributions to:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Digital Discovery

They have collaborated with multiple researchers on various projects, including frequent coauthors:

  • Jay I. Myung (13 joint publications)
  • Jorge Chang (5 joint publications)
  • Benji Maruyama (5 joint publications)
  • Woo-Young Ahn (4 joint publications)
  • Ran Zhou (4 joint publications)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study," 2020, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
  • "Toward autonomous additive manufacturing: Bayesian optimization on a 3D printer," 2021, MRS Bulletin
  • "Efficient Closed-loop Maximization of Carbon Nanotube Growth Rate using Bayesian Optimization," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Anxiety Modulates Preference for Immediate Rewards Among Trait-Impulsive Individuals: A Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis," 2020, Clinical Psychological Science

Best Publications

  • Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

    Mark A. Pitt;In Jae Myung;Shaobo Zhang

  • When a good fit can be bad.

    Mark A. Pitt;In Jae Myung

  • Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach

    In Jae Myung;Mark A. Pitt

  • Advances in Minimum Description Length: Theory and Applications

    Peter D. Grünwald;In Jae Myung;Mark A. Pitt

  • The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability

    Mark A. Pitt;Keith Johnson;Elizabeth Hume;Scott F. Kiesling

  • Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon

    Mark A. Pitt;James M. McQueen

  • Altering Context Speech Rate Can Cause Words to Appear or Disappear

    Laura C. Dilley;Mark A. Pitt

  • Counting probability distributions: Differential geometry and model selection

    In Jae Myung;Vijay Balasubramanian;Mark A. Pitt

  • The use of rhythm in attending to speech.

    Mark A. Pitt;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Adaptive design optimization: A mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science

    Daniel R. Cavagnaro;Jay I. Myung;Mark A. Pitt;Janne V. Kujala

  • Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters

    Mark A. Pitt

  • Global model analysis by parameter space partitioning.

    Mark A. Pitt;Woojae Kim;Daniel J. Navarro;Jay I. Myung

  • Optimal experimental design for model discrimination.

    Jay I. Myung;Mark A. Pitt

  • Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: insights from response surface analysis.

    In Jae Myung;Cheongtag Kim;Mark A. Pitt

  • Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.

    Mark A. Pitt

  • Model selection by normalized maximum likelihood

    Jay I. Myung;Daniel J. Navarro;Mark A. Pitt

  • Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation

    Arthur G. Samuel;Mark A. Pitt

  • A Tutorial on Adaptive Design Optimization.

    Jay I. Myung;Daniel R. Cavagnaro;Mark A. Pitt

  • An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.

    Mark A. Pitt;Arthur G. Samuel

  • Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants.

    Mark A. Pitt;Laura Dilley;Michael Tat

  • A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition

    Laura C. Dilley;Mark A. Pitt

  • Lexical and Sublexical Feedback in Auditory Word Recognition

    Mark A. Pitt;Arthur G. Samuel

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhong-Lin Lu
Zhong-Lin Lu New York University Shanghai
Arthur G. Samuel
Arthur G. Samuel Stony Brook University
J. Devin McAuley
J. Devin McAuley Michigan State University
Keith A. Johnson
Keith A. Johnson Harvard University
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Robert G. Crowder
Robert G. Crowder Yale University
Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine
Byoung-Tak Zhang
Byoung-Tak Zhang Seoul National University
Susan Nittrouer
Susan Nittrouer University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career possibilities. Many students now choose online learning for speed, flexibility, and affordability. If you want to upskill quickly, 1 year graduate programs let you earn advanced credentials in less time, helping you launch or grow your career faster.

For those seeking flexibility, accelerated degree programs can put you on a fast track to earning your bachelor’s degree. These programs are designed for motivated learners who want to balance studies with work or other commitments.

Career paths in social work and behavioral sciences are also accessible online. An msw degree (Master of Social Work) is ideal for those interested in community service, mental health, or advocacy. Meanwhile, the bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) are a popular route for those interested in behavioral therapy and applied behavior analysis.

All these online pathways offer accredited, flexible options that fit a variety of goals—whether you want to advance your career, switch fields, or specialize within Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Pitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles