World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
5879
World Ranking
6619
National Ranking
412

M. Anne Naeth publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Anne Naeth sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 201 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

M. Anne Naeth D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Anne Naeth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Anne Naeth is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and is an active researcher in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist has contributed extensively to research topics such as:

  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

M. Anne Naeth has co-authored with several frequent collaborators including Amalesh Dhar, S. R. Wilkinson, Scott X. Chang, Christopher Nzediegwu, and Yihan Zhao. The number of collaborations with these co-authors ranges from 7 to 37 publications, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Their publications are commonly found in scientific venues such as Restoration Ecology, Land, The Science of The Total Environment, Ecological Engineering, and Bioresource Technology. Notably, the number of publications in these venues highlights consistent contributions, with eight papers appearing in Restoration Ecology and six in Land.

Key recent papers authored by the researcher include:

  • "Biochar surface complexation and Ni(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) adsorption in aqueous solutions depend on feedstock type" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Biochar heavy metal removal in aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging gas" (2021, Environmental Pollution)
  • "Fuel, thermal and surface properties of microwave-pyrolyzed biochars depend on feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature" (2020, Bioresource Technology)
  • "Pristine and engineered biochar for the removal of contaminants co-existing in several types of industrial wastewaters: A critical review" (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Lead(II) adsorption on microwave-pyrolyzed biochars and hydrochars depends on feedstock type and production temperature" (2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials)

Best Publications

  • Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment

    Young D. Choi;Vicky M. Temperton;Edith B. Allen;Albert P. Grootjans

  • Biochar properties and lead(II) adsorption capacity depend on feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature, and steam activation.

    Jin-Hyeob Kwak;Shahinoor Islam;Siyuan Wang;Selamawit Ashagre Messele

  • Biochar surface complexation and Ni(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) adsorption in aqueous solutions depend on feedstock type.

    Siyuan Wang;Jin-Hyeob Kwak;Shahinoor Islam;M. Anne Naeth

  • Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategy for solar and wind energy systems.

    Amalesh Dhar;M. Anne Naeth;P. Dev Jennings;Mohamed Gamal El-Din

  • The role of the forest soil propagule bank in assisted natural recovery after oil sands mining.

    Dean D. Mackenzie;M. Anne Naeth

  • Biochar heavy metal removal in aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging gas.

    Shahinoor Islam;Jin Hyeob Kwak;Christopher Nzediegwu;Siyuan Wang

  • Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta

    N. T. Donkor;J. V. Gedir;R. J. Hudson;E. W. Bork

  • Pristine and engineered biochar for the removal of contaminants co-existing in several types of industrial wastewaters: A critical review.

    Deborah Cristina Crominski da Silva Medeiros;Christopher Nzediegwu;Chelsea Benally;Selamawit Ashagre Messele

  • Multi-scale impacts of crested wheatgrass invasion in mixed-grass prairie.

    Darcy C. Henderson;M. Anne. Naeth

  • Grazing impacts on bulk density and soil strength in the foothills fescue grasslands of Alberta, Canada

    David S. ChanasYk;d M. Anne Naeth

  • Effect of native prairie, crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (l.) Gaertn.) and Russian wildrye (Elymus junceus Fisch.) on soil chemical properties.

    Johan F. Dormaar;M. Anne Naeth;Walter D. Willms;David S. Chanasyk

  • Woody Debris Amendment Enhances Reclamation after Oil Sands Mining in Alberta, Canada

    Robyn L. Brown;M. Anne Naeth

  • Carbonization temperature and feedstock type interactively affect chemical, fuel, and surface properties of hydrochars

    Christopher Nzediegwu;M. Anne Naeth;Scott X. Chang

  • Response to Timoney critique of Royal Society of Canada expert panel on oil sands.

    Steve E. Hrudey;M. Anne Naeth;René Therrien;Glen Van Der Kraak

  • Plant community development following reclamation of oil sands mine sites in the boreal forest: a review

    Amalesh Dhar;Philip G. Comeau;Justine Karst;Bradley D. Pinno

  • A history of lignite coal mining and reclamation practices in Lusatia, eastern Germany

    Unknown

  • Geothermal energy resources: potential environmental impact and land reclamation

    Amalesh Dhar;M. Anne Naeth;P. Devereaux Jennings;Mohamed Gamal El-Din

  • GRAZING IMPACTS ON INFILTRATION IN MIXED PRAIRIE AND FESCUE GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS OF ALBERTA

    Unknown

  • Feather keratin derived sorbents for the treatment of wastewater produced during energy generation processes

    Irum Zahara;Muhammad Arshad;M. Anne Naeth;Tariq Siddique

  • Initial Ecosystem Processes as Key Factors of Landscape Development—A Review

    Thomas Raab;Julia Krümmelbein;Anna Schneider;Werner Gerwin

  • Establishment of a Vegetation Cover on Tundra Kimberlite Mine Tailings: 2. A Field Study

    Neil B. Reid;M. Anne Naeth

  • Grazing and soil carbon along a gradient of Alberta rangelands

    Darcy C. Henderson;Ben H. Ellert;M. Anne Naeth

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott X. Chang
Scott X. Chang University of Alberta
Mohamed Gamal El-Din
Mohamed Gamal El-Din University of Alberta
Reinhard F. Hüttl
Reinhard F. Hüttl Brandenburg University of Technology
Philip G. Comeau
Philip G. Comeau University of Alberta
Vern S. Baron
Vern S. Baron Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Yong Sik Ok
Yong Sik Ok Korea University
Edward W. Bork
Edward W. Bork University of Alberta
Roni Aloni
Roni Aloni Tel Aviv University
Edith B. Allen
Edith B. Allen University of California, Riverside
K. Neil Harker
K. Neil Harker Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Professionals interested in Ecology and Evolution often explore related fields to expand their skill set or pursue new roles. Today, online education makes it easier than ever to specialize or change career directions while balancing work and life commitments.

For those with an interest in the behavioral aspects of wildlife or conservation, pursuing an online masters in clinical psychology can provide valuable interdisciplinary insights. Similarly, individuals looking to support communities may benefit from a human services degree online, perfect for bridging biological and social sciences.

If you come from a teaching background in biology or environmental science, you might consider a career change for teachers higher pay by moving into high-demand areas such as speech pathology or scientific communication.

Finally, those interested in environmental design or sustainable habitats should explore online architecture school options, which can open pathways to careers in sustainable architecture and environmental planning.

Best Scientists Citing M. Anne Naeth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles