World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
16646
World Ranking
2698
National Ranking
1552

Victor H. Denenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor H. Denenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 264 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Victor H. Denenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor H. Denenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Victor H. Denenberg was a researcher affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their academic career included contributions recognized by the scientific community, evident from their election as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1963.

Denenberg's work did not have specific papers, co-authors, or research topics listed in the available data, indicating either a focus on broader scientific contributions or limited digital records of their published output. Despite this, their career presence was established enough to merit fellowship in a major science association.

As an academic professional associated with a research university, their role likely involved research and education at a higher education institution, contributing to scientific discourse within their field during their active years.

The designation of being deceased situates Denenberg's career in a historical context, reflecting contributions made during an earlier period of scientific development. Records indicate that Denenberg passed away some time after earning recognition in 1963.

Best Publications

  • Open-Field Behavior in the Rat: what does it Mean?

    Victor H. Denenberg

  • Hemispheric laterality in animals and the effects of early experience

    Victor H. Denenberg

  • Two independent behavioral dimensions in open-field performance.

    Arthur E. Whimbey;Victor H. Denenberg

  • CRITICAL PERIODS, STIMULUS INPUT, AND EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY: A THEORY OF INFANTILE STIMULATION.

    Victor H. Denenberg

  • Physiological and behavioral effects of infantile stimulation

    Unknown

  • Infantile stimulation induces brain lateralization in rats

    VH Denenberg;J Garbanati;DA Sherman;DA Yutzey

  • Estradiol facilitates performance as working memory load increases.

    Heather A. Bimonte;Victor H. Denenberg

  • Olfactory bulb removal eliminates maternal behavior in the mouse.

    Ronald Gandelman;M. X. Zarrow;Victor H. Denenberg;Michael Myers

  • A role for ovarian hormones in sexual differentiation of the brain.

    Roslyn Holly Fitch;Victor H. Denenberg

  • Corpus callosum: region-specific effects of sex, early experience and age.

    Albert S. Berrebi;Roslyn H. Fitch;Diana L. Ralphe;Julie O. Denenberg

  • Modification of the corticosterone response curve as a function of handling in infancy

    Jonathan L. Hess;Victor H. Denenberg;M.X. Zarrow;W.Dean Pfeifer

  • Prolactin: Is it an essential hormone for maternal behavior in the mammal?

    M.X Zarrow;R Gandelman;V.H Denenberg

  • A developmental study of sex and age interactions in the human corpus callosum

    Patricia E. Cowell;Laura S. Allen;Nadia S. Zalatimo;Victor H. Denenberg

  • A factor analysis of the human's corpus callosum.

    Victor H. Denenberg;Andrew Kertesz;Patricia E. Cowell

  • State organization in neonates: developmental inconsistency indicates risk for developmental dysfunction.

    E B Thoman;V H Denenberg;J Sievel;L P Zeidner

  • The development of standard stimulus animals for mouse (Mus musculus) aggression testing by means of olfactory bulbectomy

    Victor H. Denenberg;Elise Gaulin-Kremer;Ronald Gandelman;M.X. Zarrow

  • Behavior of Adult Rats Is Modified by the Experiences Their Mothers Had as Infants

    Victor H. Denenberg;Arthur E. Whimbey

  • Water version of the radial-arm maze: learning in three inbred strains of mice.

    Lynn A Hyde;Blair J Hoplight;Victor H Denenberg

  • EFFECTS OF HANDLING IN INFANCY UPON ADULT BEHAVIOR AND ADRENOCORTICAL ACTIVITY: SUGGESTIONS FOR A NEUROENDOCRINE MECHANISM1

    Victor H. Denenberg;M.X. Zarrow

  • Effects of environmental complexity and social groupings upon modification of emotional behavior.

    Victor H. Denenberg;John R. C. Morton

  • Commentary: is maternal stimulation the mediator of the handling effect in infancy?

    Victor H. Denenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon F. Sherman
Gordon F. Sherman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Glenn D. Rosen
Glenn D. Rosen Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Albert M. Galaburda
Albert M. Galaburda Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Albert S. Berrebi
Albert S. Berrebi West Virginia University
Yong Tae Kwon
Yong Tae Kwon Seoul National University
Andrew Kertesz
Andrew Kertesz University of Western Ontario
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Seymour Levine
Seymour Levine Stanford University
Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to various online degree options and professional career paths. Many students are interested in clinical roles, such as becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Educational and licensing requirements for these careers can differ based on location.

For example, Philadelphia mft education requirements emphasize accredited graduate programs and supervised clinical hours. If you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Phoenix, you'll find that Arizona has specific coursework and post-degree experience standards.

Depending on where you want to practice, requirements will vary. Check the Pittsburgh mft certification requirements for details about state exams and continuing education in Pennsylvania. For those considering Texas, review the Plano mft education requirements for a breakdown of degree prerequisites and clinical training.

Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and can often be tailored to your state’s licensing needs. Be sure to research your specific state and career goals to ensure you meet all requirements for your chosen pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Victor H. Denenberg

Recently Published Articles