World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
12941
World Ranking
13732
National Ranking
162

Yong Tae Kwon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yong Tae Kwon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 177 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Yong Tae Kwon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yong Tae Kwon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yong Tae Kwon is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea and focuses their research on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their subfields include Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Cell Biology, Cancer Research, and Immunology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Their recent papers include the following:

  • 'The AUTOTAC chemical biology platform for targeted protein degradation via the autophagy-lysosome system', 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • 'p62-Induced Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Activation via the Nrf2-ATF6 Pathway Promotes Lung Tumorigenesis', 2021, published in Cancers
  • 'Targeted degradation of ⍺-synuclein aggregates in Parkinson's disease using the AUTOTAC technology', 2023, published in Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • 'Chemical modulation of SQSTM1/p62-mediated xenophagy that targets a broad range of pathogenic bacteria', 2022, published in Autophagy
  • 'Aggresomal sequestration and STUB1-mediated ubiquitylation during mammalian proteaphagy of inhibited proteasomes', 2020, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Yong Tae Kwon often collaborates with other researchers; frequent co-authors include Chang Hoon Ji, Su Kim, Ah Jung Heo, Bo Yeon Kim, and Min Ju Lee.

The scientist frequently publishes in specific venues, with multiple works appearing in:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Autophagy
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell Reports

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies

    Aaron Ciechanover;Yong T.ae Kwon

  • The Ubiquitin Code in the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Autophagy

    Yong Tae Kwon;Aaron Ciechanover;Aaron Ciechanover

  • The N-End Rule Pathway

    Takafumi Tasaki;Shashikanth M. Sriram;Kyong Soo Park;Yong Tae Kwon

  • A Family of Mammalian E3 Ubiquitin Ligases That Contain the UBR Box Motif and Recognize N-Degrons

    Takafumi Tasaki;Lubbertus C. F. Mulder;Akihiro Iwamatsu;Min Jae Lee

  • Effects of low dose quercetin: cancer cell-specific inhibition of cell cycle progression.

    Jae-Hoon Jeong;Jee Young An;Yong Tae Kwon;Juong G. Rhee

  • An Essential Role of N-Terminal Arginylation in Cardiovascular Development

    Yong Tae Kwon;Anna S. Kashina;Ilia V. Davydov;Rong-Gui Hu

  • Role of the IL-6-JAK1-STAT3-Oct-4 pathway in the conversion of non-stem cancer cells into cancer stem-like cells

    Seog Young Kim;Jin Wook Kang;Xinxin Song;Bo Kyoung Kim

  • Crosstalk and Interplay between the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Autophagy.

    Chang Hoon Ji;Yong Tae Kwon

  • RGS4 and RGS5 are in vivo substrates of the N-end rule pathway

    Min Jae Lee;Takafumi Tasaki;Kayoko Moroi;Jee Young An

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Deficiency of UBR1, a ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway, causes pancreatic dysfunction, malformations and mental retardation (Johanson-Blizzard syndrome).

    Martin Zenker;Julia Mayerle;Markus M Lerch;Andreas Tagariello

  • Protein Quality Control by Molecular Chaperones in Neurodegeneration

    Aaron Ciechanover;Aaron Ciechanover;Yong Tae Kwon

  • p62/SQSTM1/Sequestosome-1 is an N-recognin of the N-end rule pathway which modulates autophagosome biogenesis

    Hyunjoo Cha-Molstad;Ji Eun Yu;Ji Eun Yu;Zhiwei Feng;Su Hyun Lee

  • p62- and ubiquitin-dependent stress-induced autophagy of the mammalian 26S proteasome

    Victoria Cohen-Kaplan;Ido Livneh;Noa Avni;Bertrand Fabre

  • Amino-terminal arginylation targets endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP for autophagy through p62 binding.

    Hyunjoo Cha-Molstad;Ki Sa Sung;Joonsung Hwang;Kyoung A. Kim

  • Ubiquitin conjugation by the N-end rule pathway and mRNAs for its components increase in muscles of diabetic rats.

    Stewart H. Lecker;Vered Solomon;S. Russ Price;Yong Tae Kwon

  • The mouse and human genes encoding the recognition component of the N-end rule pathway.

    Yong Tae Kwon;Yuval Reiss;Victor A. Fried;Avram Hershko

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron Ciechanover
Aaron Ciechanover Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yong J. Lee
Yong J. Lee University of Pittsburgh
Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky California Institute of Technology
David L. Bartlett
David L. Bartlett University of Pittsburgh
Dong-Hyun Kim
Dong-Hyun Kim Kyung Hee University
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Gerald W. Dorn
Gerald W. Dorn Washington University in St. Louis
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Yong Tae Kwon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles