World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
28599
World Ranking
9802
National Ranking
5037

David L. Bartlett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 468 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David L. Bartlett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Bartlett is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad fields, their work centers on oncology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and cancer research.

The scientist's main topics of study include pancreatic and hepatic oncology research, CAR-T cell therapy research, cancer genomics and diagnostics, virus-based gene therapy research, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, immunotherapy and immune responses, and intraperitoneal and appendiceal malignancies.

David L. Bartlett has published extensively in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancers
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • HPB

Their recent papers cover a range of topics in cancer therapy and immunology, including:

  • A Randomized Phase II Preoperative Study of Autophagy Inhibition with High-Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer Patients, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Oncolytic vaccinia virus delivering tethered IL-12 enhances antitumor effects with improved safety, 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide, 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • Synergistic Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy and Immunotherapy for Glioma, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Oncolytic virus promotes tumor-reactive infiltrating lymphocytes for adoptive cell therapy, 2020, Cancer Gene Therapy

Throughout their career, Bartlett has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Patrick Wagner
  • Casey J. Allen
  • Ali H. Zaidi
  • Edward A. Joseph
  • William A. LaFramboise

This body of work contributes to diverse and advancing areas within oncology and immunotherapy, treating complex malignancies and exploring innovative therapeutic approaches such as virotherapy and cellular therapies.

Best Publications

  • Induction of CD8+ T-cell responses against novel glioma-associated antigen peptides and clinical activity by vaccinations with {alpha}-type 1 polarized dendritic cells and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized by lysine and carboxymethylcellulose in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

    Hideho Okada;Pawel Kalinski;Ryo Ueda;Aki Hoji

  • Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer. Implications for staging and management.

    David L. Bartlett;Yuman Fong;Joseph G. Fortner;Murray F. Brennan

  • Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies of Colonic Origin: A Consensus Statement

    J. Esquivel;R. Sticca;P. Sugarbaker;E. Levine

  • 250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility

    Amer H. Zureikat;A. James Moser;Brian A. Boone;David L. Bartlett

  • Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.

    Allan Tsung;David A. Geller;Daniel C. Sukato;Shirin Sabbaghian

  • Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion versus systemic chemotherapy alone for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis

    Jan Franko;Zuhaib Ibrahim;Niraj J. Gusani;Matthew P. Holtzman

  • Rational combination of oncolytic vaccinia virus and PD-L1 blockade works synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

    Zuqiang Liu;Roshni Ravindranathan;Pawel Kalinski;Z. Sheng Guo

  • Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve.

    Brian A. Boone;Mazen Zenati;Melissa E. Hogg;Jennifer Steve

  • Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.

    Mustapha Daouadi;Amer Zureikat;Mazen Zenati;Haroon Choudry

  • Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia.

    Aatur D Singhi;Kevin McGrath;Randall E Brand;Asif Khalid

  • Forty-eight-hour fast: the diagnostic test for insulinoma.

    Boaz Hirshberg;Andrea Livi;D. L. Bartlett;S. K. Libutti

  • Ferroptosis-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: Cross-talk between Ferroptosis and Apoptosis.

    Young-Sun Lee;Dae-Hee Lee;Dae-Hee Lee;Haroon A. Choudry;David L. Bartlett

  • Vaccinia virus-mediated cancer immunotherapy: cancer vaccines and oncolytics

    Zong Sheng Guo;Binfeng Lu;Zongbi Guo;Esther Giehl

  • Clinical, genetic and radiographic analysis of 108 patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) manifested by pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs).

    Joseph A. Blansfield;Lynda Choyke;Shane Y. Morita;Peter L. Choyke

  • Rational strain selection and engineering creates a broad-spectrum, systemically effective oncolytic poxvirus, JX-963.

    Steve H. Thorne;Tae-Ho H. Hwang;William E. O’Gorman;David L. Bartlett

  • Oncolytic virotherapy: molecular targets in tumor-selective replication and carrier cell-mediated delivery of oncolytic viruses.

    Z. Sheng Guo;Stephen H. Thorne;David L. Bartlett

  • Consensus guidelines from the American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies on standardizing the delivery of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer patients in the United States

    K. Turaga;E. Levine;R. Barone;R. Sticca

  • Induction of permeability across endothelial cell monolayers by tumor necrosis factor (TNF) occurs via a tissue factor–dependent mechanism: relationship between the procoagulant and permeability effects of TNF

    Josef Friedl;Markus Puhlmann;David L. Bartlett;Steven K. Libutti

  • Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A new standard of care

    Hernan I. Vargas;Louis R. Kavoussi;David L. Bartlett;Joseph R. Wagner

  • Erratum: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: A consensus statement (Annals of Surgical Oncology 14 (128-133)DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9185-7)

    J. Esquivel;R. Sticca;P. Sugarbaker;E. Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert J. Zeh
Herbert J. Zeh The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
H. Richard Alexander
H. Richard Alexander Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Yong J. Lee
Yong J. Lee University of Pittsburgh
Pawel Kalinski
Pawel Kalinski Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Edward A. Levine
Edward A. Levine Wake Forest University
Steven K. Libutti
Steven K. Libutti Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Paul H. Sugarbaker
Paul H. Sugarbaker MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Michael T. Lotze
Michael T. Lotze University of Pittsburgh
Yong Tae Kwon
Yong Tae Kwon Seoul National University
David A. Geller
David A. Geller University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of medicine doesn’t always mean taking a traditional MD path. Many students find rewarding and impactful careers in the healthcare sector by choosing related degrees and alternative entry points.

For those wanting a fast and practical approach, adn nursing programs offer a quicker way to become a registered nurse, often with less competitive entry requirements. If you already hold a Bachelor’s degree, consider absn programs that don't require teas – these accelerated degrees can fast-track your nursing career without extra standardized tests.

Prefer working behind the scenes? medical billing and coding online schools train students in vital administrative skills—allowing you to support patient care from a non-clinical role. Similarly, a healthcare administration degree online accredited can open doors to management and leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and beyond.

These alternative degrees and career pathways make it possible for more people to join the healthcare field, each contributing to patient wellbeing in unique and critical ways.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Bartlett

Trending Scientists