World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
24531
World Ranking
3188
National Ranking
1230

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
24784
World Ranking
12892
National Ranking
5487

Donald L. Phillips publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald L. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 119 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Donald L. Phillips D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald L. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald L. Phillips is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields including Environmental Science, Computer Science, and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Within these domains, their work focuses on subfields such as Ecology, Artificial Intelligence, Atmospheric Science, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

The main topics addressed in their research include Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and Mineralogy and Gemology Studies.

Donald L. Phillips has contributed to scholarly publications in journals like the Journal of Geochemical Exploration and Economic Geology. Recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • Solving geological mixing problems with Bayesian tracer models: A demonstration of the method applied to Carlin-type pyrite, 2022, Journal of Geochemical Exploration
  • Nanoscale Characteristics of Carlin-Type Auriferous Pyrite from the Nadaleen Trend, Yukon, 2024, Economic Geology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Elizabeth Holley, C. E. Jilly-Rehak, PJ Sack, and Phillip Gopon.

Best Publications

  • A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain

    Christopher Daly;Ronald P. Neilson;Donald L. Phillips

  • Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources.

    Donald L. Phillips;Jillian W. Gregg;Jillian W. Gregg

  • A niche for isotopic ecology

    Seth D. Newsome;Carlos Martinez del Rio;Stuart Bearhop;Donald L. Phillips

  • Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes

    Donald L. Phillips;Jillian W. Gregg

  • Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models.

    Brian C. Stock;Andrew L. Jackson;Eric J. Ward;Andrew C. Parnell

  • Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies

    Donald L. Phillips;Richard Inger;Stuart Bearhop;Andrew L. Jackson

  • Bayesian stable isotope mixing models

    Andrew C. Parnell;Donald L. Phillips;Stuart Bearhop;Brice X. Semmens

  • Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods.

    Donald L. Phillips;Seth D. Newsome;Jillian W. Gregg

  • Chlorinated hydrocarbon levels in human serum: effects of fasting and feeding.

    DL Phillips;JL Pirkle;VW Burse;Jr Jt Bernert

  • Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models

    Donald L. Phillips;Paul L. Koch

  • Mixing models in analyses of diet using multiple stable isotopes: a critique

    Donald L. Phillips

  • Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons.

    M.G. Johnson;D.T. Tingey;D.L. Phillips;M.J. Storm

  • A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain

    Donald L Phillips;Jayne Dolph;Danny Marks

  • Converting isotope values to diet composition: the use of mixing models

    Donald L. Phillips

  • Estimates of the half-life of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Vietnam Veterans of Operation Ranch Hand.

    James L. Pirkle;William H. Wolfe;Donald G. Patterson;Larry L. Needham

  • Competition and spacing patterns in desert shrubs

    Donald L. Phillips;James A. MacMahon

  • Estimating the timing of diet shifts using stable isotopes

    Donald L. Phillips;Peter M. Eldridge

  • Quantitative differences among various proteins as blocking agents for ELISA microtiter plates.

    Vogt Rf;Phillips Dl;Henderson Lo;Whitfield W

  • Patch-size effects on early succession in southern Appalachian forests.

    Donald L. Phillips;Donald L. Phillips;Donald J. Shure

  • Elevated CO2 and conifer roots: effects on growth, life span and turnover

    David T. Tingey;Donald L. Phillips;Mark G. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

David T. Tingey
David T. Tingey Environmental Protection Agency
Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Paul T. Rygiewicz
Paul T. Rygiewicz Environmental Protection Agency
Brice X. Semmens
Brice X. Semmens University of California, San Diego
Jonathan W. Moore
Jonathan W. Moore Simon Fraser University
Seth D. Newsome
Seth D. Newsome University of New Mexico
Stuart Bearhop
Stuart Bearhop University of Exeter
Richard Inger
Richard Inger University of Exeter
Paul L. Koch
Paul L. Koch University of California, Santa Cruz
Eric J. Ward
Eric J. Ward National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many choose an online general studies degree affordable option to build a broad foundation while managing education costs effectively. This flexible approach allows learners to tailor courses toward environmental and sustainability topics.

Alternatively, some may consider the easiest bachelor's degree to get that aligns with their strengths and interests, creating a smooth path toward graduation and career entry. Many students find degrees related to environmental science rewarding and manageable when matched with their skills.

More specialized fields in environmental studies include geology and geoscience, with numerous geology online degree options available. These programs deepen understanding of earth processes, essential for careers in resource management and environmental consulting.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another rapidly growing area essential to environmental research and planning. The best GIS programs offer training in mapping and spatial data analysis, skills in high demand among environmental professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Donald L. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles