World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
11542
World Ranking
4160
National Ranking
1449

Seth D. Newsome publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth D. Newsome sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 196 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Seth D. Newsome D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Seth D. Newsome sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Seth D. Newsome is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States, with an extensive research focus within environmental science, particularly ecology. Their scholarly work encompasses a range of topics centered on isotope analysis and ecological studies involving various organisms and ecosystems.

The primary fields of study for Newsome include Environmental Science with a strong emphasis on subfields such as Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, and Oceanography. Their research topics largely focus on:

  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations

Newsome has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Ecosphere
  • Oecologia
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Some of Newsome's recent papers are:

  • "Meta-analysis of primary producer amino acid δ 15N values and their influence on trophic position estimation," 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Late Pleistocene megafauna extinction leads to missing pieces of ecological space in a North American mammal community," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Isotopic and genetic methods reveal the role of the gut microbiome in mammalian host essential amino acid metabolism," 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Fasting affects amino acid nitrogen isotope values: a new tool for identifying nitrogen balance of free-ranging mammals," 2020, Oecologia
  • "Assessing the potential of amino acid δ 13C and δ 15N analysis in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems," 2022, Journal of Ecology

Newsome collaborates regularly with a range of coauthors, frequently working alongside:

  • Emma A. Elliott Smith
  • John P. Whiteman
  • Philip J. Manlick
  • Tara L. E. Trammell
  • Julie C. Zinnert

Best Publications

  • A niche for isotopic ecology

    Seth D. Newsome;Carlos Martinez del Rio;Stuart Bearhop;Donald L. Phillips

  • Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods.

    Donald L. Phillips;Seth D. Newsome;Jillian W. Gregg

  • Using stable isotope biogeochemistry to study marine mammal ecology

    Seth D. Newsome;Mark T. Clementz;Paul L. Koch

  • Agricultural origins and the isotopic identity of domestication in northern China

    Loukas Barton;Seth D. Newsome;Fa-Hu Chen;Hui Wang

  • Using Isoscapes to Trace the Movements and Foraging Behavior of Top Predators in Oceanic Ecosystems

    Brittany S. Graham;Paul L. Koch;Seth D. Newsome;Kelton W. McMahon

  • Using stable isotopes to investigate individual diet specialization in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis)

    Seth D. Newsome;M. Tim Tinker;Daniel H. Monson;Olav T. Oftedal

  • USING CARBON AND NITROGEN ISOTOPE VALUES TO INVESTIGATE MATERNAL STRATEGIES IN NORTHEAST PACIFIC OTARIIDS

    Seth D. Newsome;Paul L. Koch;Mike A. Etnier;David Aurioles-Gamboa

  • Tools for quantifying isotopic niche space and dietary variation at the individual and population level

    Seth D. Newsome;Justin D. Yeakel;Patrick V. Wheatley;M. Tim Tinker

  • Pleistocene to recent dietary shifts in California condors

    C. P. Chamberlain;J. R. Waldbauer;K. Fox-Dobbs;S. D. Newsome

  • Deuterium enrichments in chondritic macromolecular material—Implications for the origin and evolution of organics, water and asteroids

    C.M.O’D. Alexander;S.D. Newsome;M.L. Fogel;L.R. Nittler

  • A Guide to Using Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis to Study the Fates of Molecules in Organisms and Ecosystems

    John P. Whiteman;Emma A. Elliott Smith;Alexi C. Besser;Seth D. Newsome

  • Individual variation in anthropogenic resource use in an urban carnivore.

    Seth D. Newsome;Heidi M. Garbe;Evan C. Wilson;Stanley D. Gehrt

  • Dietary reconstruction of an early to middle Holocene human population from the central California coast: insights from advanced stable isotope mixing models

    Seth D. Newsome;Donald L. Phillips;Brendan J. Culleton;Tom P. Guilderson

  • Retrospective characterization of ontogenetic shifts in killer whale diets via δ 13 C and δ 15 N analysis of teeth

    Seth D. Newsome;Michael A. Etnier;Daniel H. Monson;Marilyn L. Fogel

  • Stable isotopes evaluate exploitation of anthropogenic foods by the endangered San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)

    Seth D. Newsome;Seth D. Newsome;Katherine Ralls;Christine Van Horn Job;Marilyn L. Fogel

  • Contributions of direct incorporation from diet and microbial amino acids to protein synthesis in Nile tilapia

    Seth D. Newsome;Seth D. Newsome;Marilyn L. Fogel;Leona Kelly;Carlos Martinez del Rio

  • The shifting baseline of northern fur seal ecology in the northeast Pacific Ocean

    Seth D. Newsome;Michael A. Etnier;Diane Gifford-Gonzalez;Donald L. Phillips

  • The interaction of intraspecific competition and habitat on individual diet specialization: a near range-wide examination of sea otters.

    Seth D. Newsome;M. Tim Tinker;Verena A. Gill;Zachary N. Hoyt

  • Variation in δ13C and δ15N diet–vibrissae trophic discrimination factors in a wild population of California sea otters

    Seth D. Newsome;Gena B. Bentall;M. Tim Tinker;Olav T. Oftedal

  • Amino Acid δ13C Analysis Shows Flexibility in the Routing of Dietary Protein and Lipids to the Tissue of an Omnivore

    Seth D. Newsome;Nathan Wolf;Jacob Peters;Marilyn L. Fogel

Frequent Co-Authors

Marilyn L. Fogel
Marilyn L. Fogel University of California, Riverside
Pablo Sabat
Pablo Sabat University of Chile
Paul L. Koch
Paul L. Koch University of California, Santa Cruz
S. Kathleen Lyons
S. Kathleen Lyons University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Felisa A. Smith
Felisa A. Smith University of New Mexico
Torben C. Rick
Torben C. Rick National Museum of Natural History
Carlos Martínez del Rio
Carlos Martínez del Rio University of Wyoming
Chris Harrod
Chris Harrod University of Glasgow
M. Tim Tinker
M. Tim Tinker United States Geological Survey
Katherine Ralls
Katherine Ralls Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students intrigued by Ecology and Evolution, exploring additional online degrees can broaden career opportunities in science and healthcare. Many universities now offer accredited programs that fit diverse educational backgrounds and lifestyles.

If you have an interest in the intersection of biology and patient care, you may consider nursing programs with strong capella university nursing accreditation. These credentials ensure education meets high industry standards.

Registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications may pursue a bsn to msn online. These flexible bridge programs let you move into leadership or specialist roles, combining a science foundation with practical skills.

When selecting an institution, consider the advantages of non profit colleges. Nonprofit universities often place a greater emphasis on academic quality and student support.

Also, if you are a veteran or active-duty service member, look for online military friendly colleges. These schools provide unique resources and flexible schedules tailored to your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Seth D. Newsome

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles