World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
8633
World Ranking
4690
National Ranking
2227

Claudio Violato publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Violato sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Claudio Violato D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Violato sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudio Violato is a researcher affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Family Practice, and Social Psychology.

Their research topics include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Violato has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Academic Medicine
  • Medical Science Educator
  • PLoS ONE
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Impact of the stringency of lockdown measures on covid-19: A theoretical model of a pandemic (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Validity Evidence for Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities During Undergraduate Medical Education (2021, Academic Medicine)
  • Stability and Differences in Empathy Between Men and Women Medical Students: a Panel Design Study (2021, Medical Science Educator)
  • Race and Gender Bias in Clerkship Grading (2023, Teaching and Learning in Medicine)
  • Assessing clinical competence: a multitrait-multimethod matrix construct validity study (2023, Advances in Health Sciences Education)

Violato frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Mohammed A. A. Abulela
  • Bethany Schowengerdt
  • Esther Dale
  • Robert Englander
  • Heather Dorr

Best Publications

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Published Research on the Effects of Child Sexual Abuse

    Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci;Mark L. Genuis;Claudio Violato

  • Structural equation modeling in medical research: a primer

    Tanya N Beran;Claudio Violato

  • The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: a meta-analysis of the published research.

    Tyrone Donnon;Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci;Claudio Violato

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Educational Effectiveness of Three-Dimensional Visualization Technologies in Teaching Anatomy.

    Kaissar Yammine;Claudio Violato;Claudio Violato

  • A meta-analysis of the published research on the affective, cognitive, and behavioral effects of corporal punishment.

    Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci;Claudio Violato

  • Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review

    William Hall;Claudio Violato;Raymond Lewkonia;Jocelyn Lockyer

  • The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review.

    Tyrone Donnon;Ahmed Al Ansari;Samah Al Alawi;Claudio Violato

  • Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice

    Claudio Violato;Jocelyn Lockyer;Herta Fidler

  • Ratings of university teacher instruction: how much do student and course characteristics really matter?

    Tanya Beran;Claudio Violato

  • Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback.

    Herta Fidler;Jocelyn M. Lockyer;John Toews;Claudio Violato

  • A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of pornography.

    Elizabeth Oddone-Paolucci;Mark Genuis;Claudio Violato

  • How to Use Structural Equation Modeling in Medical Education Research: A Brief Guide

    Claudio Violato;Kent G. Hecker

  • The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

    Kaissar Yammine;Claudio Violato;Claudio Violato

  • The Utility of Student Ratings of Instruction for Students, Faculty, and Administrators: A "Consequential Validity" Study

    Tanya Beran;Claudio Violato;Don Kline;Jim Frideres

  • Problems of research in male child sexual abuse: A review

    Claudio Violato;Mark Genuis

  • Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning.

    Claudio Violato;Jocelyn Lockyer

  • Teaching in small portions dispersed over time enhances long-term knowledge retention.

    Maitreyi Raman;Kevin McLaughlin;Claudio Violato;Alaa Rostom

  • A model of childhood perceived peer harassment: analyses of the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth Data.

    Tanya N. Beran;Claudio Violato

  • Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians.

    Claudio Violato;Anthony Marini;John Toews;Jocelyn Lockyer

  • Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme

    Claudio Violato;Jocelyn M Lockyer;Herta Fidler

Frequent Co-Authors

Jocelyn Lockyer
Jocelyn Lockyer University of Calgary
Nady el-Guebaly
Nady el-Guebaly University of Calgary
Arno M. M. Muijtjens
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Maastricht University
Rollin Brant
Rollin Brant University of British Columbia
Jason B. Coe
Jason B. Coe University of Guelph
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities field offers a range of flexible online degree options in the USA, catering to diverse student interests and career goals. Many students are now turning to cacrep-accredited online counseling programs, which provide quality education and are recognized by employers nationwide. These programs help prepare graduates to support individuals in managing mental health challenges and life transitions.

For those interested in relationships and family dynamics, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy is a strong choice. This path focuses on practical therapy skills and paves the way for professional licensure.

Broader studies in human behavior are available too. Pursuing an accredited online psychology degree can open doors to roles in counseling, research, or organizational consulting.

Finally, those committed to social change may consider the msw online route. This degree prepares graduates for vital roles in social work and community leadership. Together, these online pathways offer both affordability and flexibility, making education more accessible for future social science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Violato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles