World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
19943
World Ranking
2804
National Ranking
1621

Neil M. Malamuth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil M. Malamuth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neil M. Malamuth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil M. Malamuth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil M. Malamuth is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with notable contributions in several subfields including gender studies, sociology and political science, health, clinical psychology, and literature and literary theory.

The main topics covered by their work focus significantly on issues related to sexual assault and victimization studies, gender, feminism, and media, as well as intimate partner and family violence. Additional research interests extend to sexuality, behavior, and technology, media influence and health, social and intergroup psychology, and sex work and related issues.

Neil M. Malamuth has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Aggressive Behavior
  • Sex Roles
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Psychology of Violence

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Factors predictive of sexual violence: Testing the four pillars of the Confluence Model in a large diverse sample of college men (2021, Aggressive Behavior)
  • "Feeling my Sister's Pain": Perceived Victim Suffering Moderates the Impact of Sexualized Music Videos on Fijian Women's Responses to Men's Intimate Partner Violence against Women (2020, Sex Roles)
  • Priming Self-Affirmation Reduces the Negative Impact of High Rape Myth Acceptance: Assessing Women's Perceptions and Judgments of Sexual Assault (2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence)
  • Corrigendum to Malamuth et al. (2021): Reference correction (2021, Aggressive Behavior)
  • Strongly identified White Europeans' humanization of the complainant predicts elevated punishment for a Black but not White university student accused of sexual assault (2024, Psychology of Violence)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Neil M. Malamuth include:

  • Mark Huppin
  • Raina V. Lamade
  • Mary P. Koss
  • Elise Lopez
  • Christopher Seaman

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Media Violence on Youth

    Craig A. Anderson;Leonard Berkowitz;Edward I Donnerstein;L. Rowell Huesmann

  • Characteristics of aggressors against women: testing a model using a national sample of college students.

    Neil M. Malamuth;Robert J. Sockloskie;Mary P. Koss;J. S. Tanaka

  • Rape proclivity among males.

    Neil M. Malamuth;Neil M. Malamuth

  • Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression.

    Neil M. Malamuth

  • Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study.

    Neil M. Malamuth;Daniel Linz;Christopher L. Heavey;Gordon Barnes

  • Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape.

    James V. Check;Neil M. Malamuth

  • The Effects of Mass Media Exposure on Acceptance of Violence against Women: A Field Experiment.

    Neil M Malamuth;James V.P Check

  • Pornography and sexual aggression: are there reliable effects and can we understand them?

    Neil M. Malamuth;Tamara Addison;Mary Koss

  • The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict.

    Christopher L. Heavey;Andrew Christensen;Neil M. Malamuth

  • Self-Perceived Effects of Pornography Consumption

    Gert Martin Hald;Neil M. Malamuth

  • Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies.

    Gert Martin Hald;Neil M. Malamuth;Carlin Yuen

  • Juvenile sex offenders: toward the development of a typology.

    John A. Hunter;Aurelio J. Figueredo;Neil M. Malamuth;Judith V. Becker

  • Testing hypotheses regarding rape: Exposure to sexual violence, sex differences, and the “normality” of rapists

    Neil M Malamuth;Scott Haber;Seymour Feshbach

  • The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences

    Neil M. Malamuth;James V.P. Check

  • Self-reported likelihood of sexually aggressive behavior: Attitudinal versus sexual explanations ☆

    John Briere;Neil M Malamuth;Neil M Malamuth

  • Pornography and Sexual Aggression.

    Pauline B. Bart;Neil M. Malamuth;Edward Donnerstein

  • Sexual arousal to rape depictions: individual differences.

    Neil M. Malamuth;James V. Check

  • Penile Tumescence and Perceptual Responses to Rape as a Function of Victim's Perceived Reactions1

    Neil M. Malamuth;James V. P. Check

  • Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: testing three explanations

    Neil M. Malamuth;Lisa M. Brown

  • The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one 1

    Neil M. Malamuth

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Linz
Daniel Linz University of California, Santa Barbara
Seymour Feshbach
Seymour Feshbach University of California, Los Angeles
Mary P. Koss
Mary P. Koss University of Arizona
Aurelio José Figueredo
Aurelio José Figueredo University of Arizona
Judith V. Becker
Judith V. Becker University of Arizona
John Briere
John Briere University of Southern California
Edward Donnerstein
Edward Donnerstein University of Arizona
L. Rowell Huesmann
L. Rowell Huesmann University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew Christensen
Andrew Christensen University of California, Los Angeles
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of in-demand career pathways, especially within counseling and mental health support roles. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, where professionals play a vital role in helping individuals overcome addiction and lead healthier lives.

It’s important to note that the requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor can vary depending on the specific state or city. For example, aspiring counselors should be aware of the substance abuse counselor requirements in Chesapeake, as well as the Chicago substance abuse counselor certification requirements. These typically include educational qualifications, supervised clinical experience, and passing relevant exams.

If you’re considering work in other areas, it’s helpful to review the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in Chula Vista and the Cincinnati substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Online degrees in psychology often provide the flexibility needed to complete these essential educational and certification steps.

Exploring related online programs can help you find the best fit for your career aspirations and local professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Neil M. Malamuth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles