World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 5050 4686 2771 2510 121 8666

Jeanette Norris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeanette Norris between 1981 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeanette Norris published across 41 years, from 1981 to 2021, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2014. 2 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2014. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1981 2021

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeanette Norris: publications per year, 1981 to 2021
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 0
2004 4
2005 1
2006 8
2007 8
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 11
2015 8
2016 10
2017 7
2018 8
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
Total 121
Download as CSV

Jeanette Norris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette Norris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 121
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeanette Norris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette Norris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeanette Norris is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with focused contributions in Epidemiology, General Health Professions, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health. Their work addresses significant issues related to substance abuse treatment and outcomes, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and prenatal substance exposure effects.

The scientist has published research in recognized venues, including the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs and UNC Libraries. Notable recent papers include:

  • Establishing a New Measure of Alcohol-Related Sexual Consequences and Examining Its Association to Alcohol Consequences Among At-Risk Young Adults (2021, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs)
  • Women's Situational Coping With Acquaintance Sexual Assault: Applying an Appraisal-Based Model (2020, UNC Libraries)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Anne M. Fairlie
  • Anna E. Jaffe
  • Kelly Cue Davis
  • D Litt
  • Debra Kaysen

The recurring topics and themes in their research involve the intersection of alcohol-related consequences and sexual health, as well as coping mechanisms related to sexual assault. These focus areas contribute to a broader understanding of adolescent reproductive health and the impacts of substance use before and during pregnancy.

Best Publications

  • Revising the SES: A Collaborative Process to Improve Assessment of Sexual Aggression and Victimization:

    Mary P. Koss;Antonia Abbey;Rebecca Campbell;Sarah Cook

  • THROUGH HER EYES: Factors Affecting Women's Perception of and Resestance to Acquaintance Sexual Aggression Threat.

    Jeanette Norris;Paula S. Nurius;Linda A. Dimeff

  • Dating, Drinking, and Rape: Effects of Victim's and Assailant's Alcohol Consumption on Judgments of Their Behavior and Traits

    Jeanette Norris;Lisa A. Cubbins

  • Indirect Effects of Acute Alcohol Intoxication on Sexual Risk-taking: The Roles of Subjective and Physiological Sexual Arousal

    William H. George;Kelly Cue Davis;Jeanette Norris;Julia R. Heiman

  • How to Score the Sexual Experiences Survey? A Comparison of Nine Methods

    Kelly Cue Davis;Amanda K. Gilmore;Cynthia A. Stappenbeck;Michael J. Balsan

  • Understanding alcohol expectancy effects: revisiting the placebo condition.

    Maria Testa;Mark T. Fillmore;Jeanette Norris;Antonia Abbey

  • Alcohol's Effects on Sexual Decision Making: An Integration of Alcohol Myopia and Individual Differences

    Kelly Cue Davis;Christian S. Hendershot;William H. George;Jeanette Norris

  • A Cognitive Ecological Model of Women's Response to Male Sexual Coercion in Dating.

    Paula S. Nurius;Jeanette Norris

  • Alcohol expectancies and sexuality: a self-fulfilling prophecy analysis of dyadic perceptions and behavior.

    William H. George;Susan A. Stoner;Jeanette Norris;Peter A. Lopez

  • Alcohol use, expectancies, and sexual sensation seeking as correlates of HIV risk behavior in heterosexual young adults.

    Christian S. Hendershot;Susan A. Stoner;William H. George;Jeanette Norris

  • Self‐Reported Alcohol Expectancies and Postdrinking Sexual Inferences About Women

    William H. George;Kelly L. Cue;Peter A. Lopez;Leif C. Crowe

  • Randomized controlled trial of a web-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-related risky sexual behavior among college students.

    Melissa A. Lewis;Megan E. Patrick;Dana M. Litt;David C. Atkins

  • Women’s Awareness of and Discomfort With Sexual Assault Cues Effects of Alcohol Consumption and Relationship Type

    Kelly Cue Davis;Susan A. Stoner;Jeanette Norris;William H. George

  • Women's condom use assertiveness and sexual risk-taking: effects of alcohol intoxication and adult victimization.

    Susan A. Stoner;Jeanette Norris;William H. George;Diane M. Morrison

  • When a Date Changes from Fun to Dangerous Factors Affecting Women's Ability to Distinguish

    Jeanette Norris;Paula S. Nurius;Thomas L. Graham

  • Liquid Courage: Alcohol Fosters Risky Sexual Decision-Making in Individuals with Sexual Fears

    Susan A. Stoner;William H. George;Laura M. Peters;Jeanette Norris

  • Women's responses to unwanted sexual advances: The role of alcohol and inhibition conflict

    Kelly Cue Davis;William H. George;Jeanette Norris

  • Interpreting and defensively responding to threat: examining appraisals and coping with acquaintance sexual aggression.

    Paula S. Nurius;Jeanette Norris;Diane S. Young;Thomas L. Graham

  • Factors related to the psychological impacts of rape on the victim.

    Jeanette Norris;Shirley Feldman-Summers

  • Responding in Their Best Interests Contextualizing Women’s Coping With Acquaintance Sexual Aggression

    Rebecca J. Macy;Paula S. Nurius;Jeanette Norris

  • Implicit alcohol associations, especially drinking identity, predict drinking over time

    Kristen P. Lindgren;Clayton Neighbors;Bethany A. Teachman;Scott A. Baldwin

Frequent Co-Authors

William H. George
William H. George University of Washington
Kelly Cue Davis
Kelly Cue Davis Arizona State University
Julia R. Heiman
Julia R. Heiman Indiana University
Diane M. Morrison
Diane M. Morrison University of Washington
Paula S. Nurius
Paula S. Nurius University of Washington
Debra Kaysen
Debra Kaysen Stanford University
Antonia Abbey
Antonia Abbey Wayne State University
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Bethany A. Teachman
Bethany A. Teachman University of Virginia
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide variety of career paths, including fast-growing fields like substance abuse counseling. Choosing the right degree program is important, as requirements often vary by state and city.

If you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Philadelphia, you will need to fulfill specific educational and certification criteria unique to that region. Likewise, understanding Phoenix substance abuse counselor certification requirements will help you navigate the steps for building a successful counseling career in Arizona.

In Pittsburgh, it's essential to research the Pittsburgh substance abuse counselors education requirements to ensure you’re meeting local standards. Meanwhile, those planning to work in Texas can benefit from understanding how to become a substance abuse counselor in Plano for insights into that specific market.

No matter where you plan to practice, pursuing the right online psychology degree and staying informed of local policies and credentials will provide a solid foundation for a meaningful career in counseling and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanette Norris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles