World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
6713
World Ranking
4792
National Ranking
195

Jane M. Cramm publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Cramm sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jane M. Cramm D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Cramm sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane M. Cramm is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands and focuses on research spanning health professions, social sciences, and medicine. Their scholarly work integrates multiple subfields including general health professions, epidemiology, social psychology, environmental and occupational health, and public health.

The researcher's recent publications address topics such as health disparities and outcomes, chronic disease management strategies, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction. Key areas of investigation also include intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, aging and gerontology, migration-related aging, and tourism studies.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jane M. Cramm include:

  • Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes, 2020, Palliative Medicine
  • Social participation is an important health behaviour for health and quality of life among chronically ill older Chinese people, 2020, BMC Geriatrics
  • The longitudinal relationship between income and social participation among Chinese older people, 2020, SSM - Population Health
  • Views of patients with multi-morbidity on what is important for patient-centered care in the primary care setting, 2020, BMC Family Practice
  • Relationships of self-management abilities to loneliness among older people: a cross-sectional study, 2020, BMC Geriatrics

Frequent co-authors collaborating on research projects with Jane M. Cramm include:

  • Anna P. Nieboer
  • Zeyun Feng
  • Sanne Jannick Kuipers
  • Warsha Jagroep
  • Semiha Denktaş

The scientist often publishes in a range of journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • BMC Geriatrics
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Research Square
  • BMC Family Practice
  • Health Expectations

The primary research focus lies on addressing various health-related behaviors and outcomes, particularly in older and chronically ill populations. Their work frequently examines the interactions between social participation, income, and health quality, as well as patient-centered care approaches and self-management strategies. This multidisciplinary approach links health professions research with broader public health and social science concerns.

Best Publications

  • The Importance of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Social Capital for the Well Being of Older Adults in the Community

    Jane M. Cramm;Hanna M. van Dijk;Anna P. Nieboer

  • The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting.

    Sanne Jannick Kuipers;Jane Murray Cramm;Anna Petra Nieboer

  • TB treatment initiation and adherence in a South African community influenced more by perceptions than by knowledge of tuberculosis

    Jane M Cramm;Harry J M Finkenflügel;Valerie Møller;Anna P Nieboer

  • Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people

    Jane M Cramm;Anna P Nieboer

  • Psychological well-being of caregivers of children with intellectual disabilities: Using parental stress as a mediating factor

    Jane Cramm;Anna Nieboer

  • The Importance of General Self-Efficacy for the Quality of Life of Adolescents with Chronic Conditions.

    Jane M. Cramm;Mathilde M. H. Strating;Marij E. Roebroeck;Anna P. Nieboer

  • Relationships between frailty, neighborhood security, social cohesion and sense of belonging among community-dwelling older people.

    Jane M Cramm;Anna P Nieboer

  • Healthcare professionals’ views on patient-centered care in hospitals

    Mathilde Berghout;Job van Exel;Laszlo Leensvaart;Jane M. Cramm

  • The importance of multidisciplinary teamwork and team climate for relational coordination among teams delivering care to older patients

    Jacqueline Hartgerink;Jane Cramm;Ton Bakker;A. van Eijsden

  • The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people

    Hanna M. Van Dijk;Jane M. Cramm;Job Van Exel;Anna P. Nieboer

  • Relational coordination promotes quality of chronic care delivery in Dutch disease-management programs

    Jane Murray Cramm;Anna Petra Nieboer

  • Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation

    Jane M Cramm;Mathilde M H Strating;Paul L de Vreede;Nardi Steverink

  • Individual- and Neighbourhood-Level Indicators of Subjective Well-Being in a Small and Poor Eastern Cape Township: The Effect of Health, Social Capital, Marital Status, and Income

    Jane Cramm;Valerie Møller;Anna Nieboer

  • Self-management abilities, physical health and depressive symptoms among patients with cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes

    Jane Murray Cramm;Anna Petra Nieboer

  • Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes.

    Sophie I van Dongen;Kim de Nooijer;Jane M Cramm;Anneke L Francke

  • Understanding older patients’ self-management abilities: functional loss, self-management, and well-being

    Jane Cramm;Jacqueline Hartgerink;Ewout Steyerberg;Ton Bakker

  • How employment support and social integration programmes are viewed by the intellectually disabled.

    J M Cramm;H Finkenflügel;R Kuijsten;N J A van Exel

  • Development and validation of a short version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) in Dutch Disease Management Programs

    Jane M Cramm;Mathilde M H Strating;Apostolos Tsiachristas;Anna P Nieboer

  • The relationship between older adults’ self-management abilities, well-being and depression

    J. M. Cramm;J. M. Hartgerink;P. L. de Vreede;T. J. Bakker

  • Factorial validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands

    Jane Murray Cramm;Anna Petra Nieboer

  • High-quality chronic care delivery improves experiences of chronically ill patients receiving care

    Jane Murray Cramm;Anna Petra Nieboer

  • Self-management abilities and frailty are important for healthy aging among community-dwelling older people; a cross-sectional study

    Jane M Cramm;Jos Twisk;Anna P Nieboer

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna P. Nieboer
Anna P. Nieboer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Johan P. Mackenbach
Johan P. Mackenbach Erasmus University Rotterdam
Apostolos Tsiachristas
Apostolos Tsiachristas University of Oxford
Job van Exel
Job van Exel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Nardi Steverink
Nardi Steverink University Medical Center Groningen
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities provides flexible options to advance your career. There’s a growing demand for qualified social workers, psychologists, and behavior analysts, making degree choices in these fields especially valuable.

Many students seek affordable msw programs online to gain skills for roles in social work, counseling, and community services. Professionals interested in behavioral interventions may consider a bcba degree online to become certified behavior analysts, opening opportunities in schools, clinics, and private practice.

Time is also a key consideration. For those looking to complete their education faster, one year msw programs and accelerated psychology programs offer intensive, streamlined paths to graduation. These programs make it possible to enter the workforce sooner while maintaining academic rigor.

Choosing the right online program can set the foundation for a successful, meaningful career in helping professions, with many flexible and affordable pathways now available for students across the globe.

Best Scientists Citing Jane M. Cramm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles