World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
87
Citations
26337
World Ranking
2841
National Ranking
1459

David S. Williams publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Williams sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 356 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David S. Williams D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Williams sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David S. Williams is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to medicine. The scientist's work focuses notably on molecular biology, oncology, ophthalmology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cell biology.

Their research topics include:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

David S. Williams has collaborated frequently with several researchers including John M. Mariadason, Laura J. Jenkins, Ian Y. Luk, Antonio E. Paniagua, and Oliver M. Sieber. These collaborations have contributed to the advancement of their fields.

The scientist has published extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Communications Biology
  • Cell Death Discovery
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Selected recent publications demonstrate the breadth of their research interests and contributions. These include:

  • "The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium," 2020, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • "Slug regulates the Dll4-Notch-VEGFR2 axis to control endothelial cell activation and angiogenesis," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Quantification of cristae architecture reveals time-dependent characteristics of individual mitochondria," 2020, Life Science Alliance
  • "Host IL11 Signaling Suppresses CD4+ T cell-Mediated Antitumor Responses to Colon Cancer in Mice," 2021, Cancer Immunology Research
  • "A human model of Batten disease shows role of CLN3 in phagocytosis at the photoreceptor-RPE interface," 2021, Communications Biology

Best Publications

  • Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

    Gorazd B. Stokin;Concepción Lillo;Tomás L. Falzone;Richard G. Brusch

  • The centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4

    John A. Sayer;John A. Sayer;Edgar A. Otto;John F. O'Toole;Gudrun Nurnberg

  • Peptide–nucleotide microdroplets as a step towards a membrane-free protocell model

    Shogo Koga;David S. Williams;Adam W. Perriman;Stephen Mann

  • Toxicity of Familial ALS-Linked SOD1 Mutants from Selective Recruitment to Spinal Mitochondria

    Jian Liu;Concepción Lillo;P.Andreas Jonsson;Christine Vande Velde

  • Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell stereocilia.

    Jan Siemens;Concepcion Lillo;Rachel A. Dumont;Anna Reynolds

  • Interfacial assembly of protein–polymer nano-conjugates into stimulus-responsive biomimetic protocells

    Xin Huang;Mei Li;David C Green;David S Williams

  • Path Decomposition and Continuity of Local Time for One‐Dimensional Diffusions, I

    David Williams

  • Genetic evidence for selective transport of opsin and arrestin by kinesin-II in mammalian photoreceptors.

    Joseph R Marszalek;Xinran Liu;Elizabeth A Roberts;Daniel Chui

  • Nephrocystin-5, a ciliary IQ domain protein, is mutated in Senior-Loken syndrome and interacts with RPGR and calmodulin

    Edgar A. Otto;Bart Loeys;Hemant Khanna;Jan Hellemans

  • Fatty acid membrane assembly on coacervate microdroplets as a step towards a hybrid protocell model

    T-Y. Dora Tang;C. Rohaida Che Hak;Alexander J. Thompson;Marina K. Kuimova

  • In-frame deletion in a novel centrosomal/ciliary protein CEP290/NPHP6 perturbs its interaction with RPGR and results in early-onset retinal degeneration in the rd16 mouse

    Bo Chang;Hemant Khanna;Norman Hawes;David Jimeno

  • Candidate exome capture identifies mutation of SDCCAG8 as the cause of a retinal-renal ciliopathy

    Edgar A Otto;Toby W Hurd;Rannar Airik;Moumita Chaki

  • Abnormal neurofilament transport caused by targeted disruption of neuronal kinesin heavy chain KIF5A

    Chun Hong Xia;Elizabeth A. Roberts;Lu Shiun Her;Xinran Liu

  • ADCK4 mutations promote steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome through CoQ10 biosynthesis disruption

    Shazia Ashraf;Heon Yung Gee;Stephanie Woerner;Stephanie Woerner;Letian X. Xie

  • Scara5 is a ferritin receptor mediating non-transferrin iron delivery.

    Jau Yi Li;Neal Paragas;Renee M. Ned;Andong Qiu

  • Localization of peripherin/rds in the disk membranes of cone and rod photoreceptors: relationship to disk membrane morphogenesis and retinal degeneration.

    Kentaro Arikawa;Laurie L Molday;Robert S Molday;David S Williams

  • Serotype-dependent packaging of large genes in adeno-associated viral vectors results in effective gene delivery in mice

    Mariacarmela Allocca;Monica Doria;Marco Petrillo;Pasqualina Colella

  • Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis

    S. C. Hillman;D. J. McMullan;G. Hall;F. S. Togneri

  • Iron traffics in circulation bound to a siderocalin (Ngal)–catechol complex

    Guanhu Bao;Matthew S Clifton;Trisha M. Hoette;Trisha M. Hoette;Kiyoshi Mori

  • Myosin VIIa Participates in Opsin Transport through The Photoreceptor Cilium

    Xinran Liu;Igor P. Udovichenko;Stephen D.M. Brown;Karen P. Steel

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan C. M. van Hest
Jan C. M. van Hest Eindhoven University of Technology
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Friedhelm Hildebrandt Boston Children's Hospital
Karen P. Steel
Karen P. Steel King's College London
Lawrence S.B. Goldstein
Lawrence S.B. Goldstein University of California, San Diego
Anand Swaroop
Anand Swaroop National Institutes of Health
Alexandra C. Newton
Alexandra C. Newton University of California, San Diego
Edgar A. Otto
Edgar A. Otto University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen Mann
Stephen Mann University of Bristol
Andrew M. Scott
Andrew M. Scott La Trobe University
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David S. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles