World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
Singapore
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 69 331 311 6 6 428 15965
Engineering and Technology 70 1076 1014 14 14 372 15481

Mark Goh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Goh between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Goh published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2021. 34 of the 510 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2021. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 31 publications 2026: 3 publications
1985 2026

510 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Goh: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 4
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 4
2003 17
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 8
2008 8
2009 8
2010 13
2011 16
2012 16
2013 17
2014 21
2015 25
2016 19
2017 21
2018 16
2019 22
2020 28
2021 45
2022 34
2023 44
2024 41
2025 31
2026 3
Total 510
Download as CSV

Mark Goh publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Goh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 425–429 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 428 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3 428
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Goh D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Goh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21 69
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

Mark Goh is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research primarily spans the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant focus on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, and Management Information Systems.

Their recent publications cover various topics within these fields. Notable papers include "A novel Kano-QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain" (2020) published in International Journal of Production Research, "Dynamic dependence and risk connectedness among oil and stock markets: New evidence from time-frequency domain perspectives" (2020) appearing in Energy, "Outsourcing logistics operations in circular economy towards to sustainable development goals" (2022) in Business Strategy and the Environment, "Factors of dropout from MOOCs: a bibliometric review" (2022) published in Library Hi Tech, and "An extended TODIM approach for group emergency decision making based on bidirectional projection with hesitant triangular fuzzy sets" (2020) in Computers & Industrial Engineering.

Throughout their career, Mark Goh has frequently published in several academic journals, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • Management Decision
  • International Journal of Production Research
  • Information Sciences

Their research topics often relate to multi-criteria decision making, sustainable supply chain management, recycling and waste management techniques, supply chain and inventory management, energy, environment and economic growth, environmental sustainability in business, and optimization and mathematical programming.

Key topics in their body of work include:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming

Mark Goh has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, with the most frequent including:

  • Yenchun Jim Wu
  • Tanmoy Kundu
  • Wei Wang
  • Zhenyong Wu
  • Ying-Ming Wang

This affiliation and research activity places Mark Goh as a contributor to various intersections of management science, operations research, and sustainable business practices. Their work addresses complex decision-making frameworks and sustainability challenges in supply chain management among other areas.

Best Publications

  • Survey: Covering problems in facility location: A review

    Reza Zanjirani Farahani;Nasrin Asgari;Nooshin Heidari;Mahtab Hosseininia

  • Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain

    Balan Sundarakani;Robert de Souza;Mark Goh;Mark Goh;Stephan M. Wagner

  • A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks

    Mark Goh;Joseph Y.S. Lim;Fanwen Meng

  • Congestion management and electronic road pricing in Singapore

    Mark Goh

  • Does ISO 9000 certification improve business performance

    Clare Chow‐Chua;Mark Goh;Tan Boon Wan

  • Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability

    Congjun Rao;Congjun Rao;Mark Goh;Yong Zhao;Junjun Zheng

  • Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets

    Yen Chun Jim Wu;Mark Goh

  • Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry

    Reza Kiani Mavi;Mark Goh;Navid Zarbakhshnia

  • Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective

    Adrien Chia;Mark Goh;Sin‐Hoon Hum

  • EOQ models with general demand and holding cost functions

    M. Goh

  • Joint pricing and inventory model for deteriorating items with expiration dates and partial backlogging under two-level partial trade credits in supply chain

    Sunil Tiwari;Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón;Mark Goh;Ali Akbar Shaikh

  • Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard crane scheduling

    Wenkai Li;Yong Wu;Matthew E. H. Petering;Mark Goh

  • Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power

    Shun Cai;Mark Goh;Robert de Souza;Gang Li

  • Impact of value chain activities on quality and innovation

    Daniel Indarto Prajogo;Peggy McDermott;Mark Goh

  • Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach

    Reza Kiani Mavi;Reza Farzipoor Saen;Mark Goh

  • Three Dimensional Bin Packing Problem with Variable Bin Height

    Yong Wu;Yong Wu;Wenkai Li;Mark Goh;Robert de Souza

  • Aligning supply chain strategy with corporate environmental strategy: A contingency approach

    Tienhua Wu;Yen Chun Jim Wu;Yenming J. Chen;Mark Goh

  • Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review

    Varthini Rajagopal;Shanmugam Prasanna Venkatesan;Mark Goh

  • Logistics development in China

    Mark Goh;Charlene Ling

  • A multi-objective approach to supply chain visibility and risk

    Min-Chun Yu;Mark Goh

  • A novel multi-objective model for green forward and reverse logistics network design

    Navid Zarbakhshnia;Hamed Soleimani;Mark Goh;Seyyedeh Sara Razavi

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua Ignatius
Joshua Ignatius University of Exeter
Thompson S. H. Teo
Thompson S. H. Teo National University of Singapore
Yenchun Jim Wu
Yenchun Jim Wu National Taiwan Normal University
Hoong Chuin Lau
Hoong Chuin Lau Singapore Management University
Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh
Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh Iran University of Science and Technology
Ali Akbar Shaikh
Ali Akbar Shaikh University of Burdwan
Sunil Tiwari
Sunil Tiwari University of Bristol
Chung-Piaw Teo
Chung-Piaw Teo National University of Singapore
Daniel Indarto Prajogo
Daniel Indarto Prajogo Monash University
Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón
Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees that fit diverse career goals and interests. A popular option is accounting, but prospective students often need to consider the cost of accounting degree, which can vary significantly based on the institution and curriculum flexibility.

If you’re interested in the technology sector, an ai online degrees pathway can lead to high-demand roles in data science, automation, and analytics. For those leaning towards the construction or infrastructure industries, understanding the online construction management degree cost is essential before enrolling, ensuring you balance quality education with budget.

For professionals aiming to reach higher management levels, choosing an executive online mba can offer advanced leadership training while allowing continued career growth. Evaluating these different pathways—including their costs, career outcomes, and flexibility—will help you make a smarter, more informed decision for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Goh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles