World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
30
Citations
5482
World Ranking
2949
National Ranking
478

Joshua Ignatius publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Ignatius sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 78 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Joshua Ignatius D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua Ignatius sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Review: A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications

    Majid Behzadian;S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara;Morteza Yazdani;Joshua Ignatius

  • An Empirical Inquiry on Knowledge Sharing Among Academicians in Higher Learning Institutions

    T. Ramayah;Jasmine A. L. Yeap;Joshua Ignatius

  • What is the leanness level of your organisation in lean transformation implementation? An integrated lean index using ANP approach

    Wai Peng Wong;Joshua Ignatius;Keng Lin Soh

  • Determining consumers' most preferred eWOM platform for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach

    Jasmine A. L. Yeap;Joshua Ignatius;T. Ramayah

  • Coordinating a socially responsible pharmaceutical supply chain under periodic review replenishment policies

    Mohammadreza Nematollahi;Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh;Joshua Ignatius;Joshua Ignatius;Mark Goh

  • Assessing Knowledge Sharing Among Academics A Validation of the Knowledge Sharing Behavior Scale (KSBS)

    T. Ramayah;Jasmine A. L. Yeap;Joshua Ignatius

  • Reverse logistics pricing strategy for a green supply chain: a view of customers’ environmental awareness

    Daqiang Chen;Joshua Ignatius;Danzhi Sun;Shalei Zhan

  • An integrated fuzzy ANP–QFD approach for green building assessment

    Joshua Ignatius;Amirah Rahman;Morteza Yazdani;Jonas Šaparauskas

  • A branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm for the truck-based drone delivery routing problem with time windows

    Unknown

  • A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA

    Mohammad Reza Ghasemi;Joshua Ignatius;Ali Emrouznejad

  • Sensitivity Analysis in MADM Methods: Application of Material Selection

    Morteza Yazdani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Joshua Ignatius;Manuel Doval Abad

  • Distributionally robust multi-period location-allocation with multiple resources and capacity levels in humanitarian logistics

    Unknown

  • PC USAGE AMONG STUDENTS IN A PRIVATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING: THE MODERATING ROLE OF PRIOR EXPERIENCE

    T. Ramayah;Joshua Ignatius;Bushra Aafaqi

  • A new method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to group decision making

    Feng Zhang;Feng Zhang;Joshua Ignatius;Chee Peng Lim;Yajun Zhao

  • Carbon efficiency evaluation: an analytical framework using fuzzy DEA

    Joshua Ignatius;Mohammad Reza Ghasemi;Feng Zhang;Ali Emrouznejad

  • Bi-level credit period coordination for periodic review inventory system with price-credit dependent demand under time value of money

    Maryam Johari;Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh;Mohammadreza Nematollahi;Mark Goh

  • A fuzzy decision support system for credit scoring

    Joshua Ignatius;Adel Hatami-Marbini;Amirah Rahman;Lalitha Dhamotharan

  • Adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for pollution-routing problem with simultaneous pickup and delivery

    Setareh Majidi;Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh;Joshua Ignatius;Joshua Ignatius

  • Impact of congestion pricing schemes on emissions and temporal shift of freight transport

    Daqiang Chen;Joshua Ignatius;Danzhi Sun;Mark Goh

  • A fuzzy expected value approach under generalized data envelopment analysis

    M.-R. Ghasemi;Joshua Ignatius;Sebastián Lozano;Ali Emrouznejad

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Goh
Mark Goh National University of Singapore
Thurasamy Ramayah
Thurasamy Ramayah Universiti Sains Malaysia
Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh
Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh Iran University of Science and Technology
Chee Peng Lim
Chee Peng Lim Swinburne University of Technology
Ali Emrouznejad
Ali Emrouznejad University of Surrey
Adel Hatami-Marbini
Adel Hatami-Marbini University of Huddersfield
Ming-Lang Tseng
Ming-Lang Tseng Asian University
Felix T.S. Chan
Felix T.S. Chan Macau University of Science and Technology
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Sebastián Lozano
Sebastián Lozano University of Seville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Joshua Ignatius

Recently Published Articles