World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
7678
World Ranking
5509
National Ranking
2999

Diane M. Morrison publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Morrison sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane M. Morrison D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Morrison sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane M. Morrison is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within medicine, health professions, and public health, with particular attention to adolescent sexual and reproductive health, sexual function and dysfunction studies, and reproductive health and contraception.

Their published work spans several specialized subfields, including general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, and environmental and occupational health as related to public health.

Among their contributions is a notable paper titled Sexual Self-Efficacy and Entitlement to Pleasure: The Association of the Female Sexual Subjectivity Inventory with Sexual Risk Taking and Experience of Orgasm, published in 2020 in the Archives of Sexual Behavior. This publication has been cited 21 times.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Diane M. Morrison include:

  • Julia C. Bond
  • Stephen E. Hawes

Their research has primarily been disseminated through the Archives of Sexual Behavior, which is a key venue for their published work.

Main topics covered by their research include:

  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception

Diane M. Morrison's academic profile shows an emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches linking medical and health professions fields with psychological and public health perspectives on sexual health and function.

Best Publications

  • The Seattle Social Development Project: Effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors.

    J. David Hawkins;Richard F. Catalano;Diane M. Morrison;Julie O'Donnell

  • Sexual Scripts Among Young Heterosexually Active Men And Women: Continuity And Change

    N. Tatiana Masters;Erin A. Casey;Elizabeth A. Wells;Diane M. Morrison

  • Negative and Positive Factors Associated With the Well-Being of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Youth

    Darrel Higa;Marilyn J. Hoppe;Taryn Lindhorst;Shawn Mincer

  • Using Focus Groups to Discuss Sensitive Topics with Children

    Marilyn J. Hoppe;Elizabeth A. Wells;Diane M. Morrison;Mary R. Gillmore

  • Adolescent contraceptive behavior: A review.

    Diane M. Morrison

  • Teen sexual behavior: applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action.

    Mary Rogers Gillmore;Matthew E. Archibald;Diane M. Morrison;Anthony Wilsdon

  • Ethnic differences in family factors related to early drug initiation.

    R F Catalano;D M Morrison;E A Wells;M R Gillmore

  • Racial Differences in Acceptability and Availability of Drugs and Early Initiation of Substance Use

    M R Gillmore;R F Catalano;D M Morrison;E A Wells

  • Condom use, frequency of sex, and number of partners: multidimensional characterization of adolescent sexual risk-taking.

    Blair Beadnell;Diane M. Morrison;Anthony Wilsdon;Elizabeth A. Wells

  • HIV/STD Risk Factors for Women with Violent Male Partners

    Blair Beadnell;Sharon A. Baker;Diane M. Morrison;Kay Knox

  • Determinants of Condom Use Among High-Risk Heterosexual Adults: A Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action1

    Diane M. Morrison;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Sharon A. Baker

  • Sexual behavior of American adolescents: Results from a U.S. national survey

    Barbara C. Leigh;Barbara C. Leigh;Diane M. Morrison;Karen Trocki;Karen Trocki;Mark T. Temple;Mark T. Temple

  • Adolescent drinking and sex: findings from a daily diary study.

    Diane M. Morrison;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Marilyn J. Hoppe;Jan Gaylord

  • Using research to guide culturally appropriate drug abuse prevention.

    Richard F. Catalano;J. David Hawkins;Claudia Krenz;Mary Gillmore

  • Differences by Gender and Sexual Experience in Adolescent Sexual Behavior: Implications for Education and HIV Prevention

    Deborah Nahom;Elizabeth Wells;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Marilyn Hoppe

  • Drinking and Condom use: Results from an Event-Based Daily Diary

    Barbara C. Leigh;Jan Gaylord Vanslyke;Marilyn J. Hoppe;Damian T. Rainey

  • Women's condom use assertiveness and sexual risk-taking: effects of alcohol intoxication and adult victimization.

    Susan A. Stoner;Jeanette Norris;William H. George;Diane M. Morrison

  • Comparison of Diary and Retrospective Measures for Recording Alcohol Consumption and Sexual Activity

    Barbara C Leigh;Mary R Gillmore;Diane M Morrison

  • Predicting contraceptive behavior from attitudes: a comparison of within- versus across-subjects procedures.

    Andrew R. Davidson;Diane M. Morrison

  • Children's Decisions About Substance Use: An Application and Extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action1

    Diane M. Morrison;Edith E. Simpson;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Elizabeth A. Wells

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Rogers Gillmore
Mary Rogers Gillmore Arizona State University
Elizabeth A. Wells
Elizabeth A. Wells University of Washington
William H. George
William H. George University of Washington
Kelly Cue Davis
Kelly Cue Davis Arizona State University
Jeanette Norris
Jeanette Norris University of Washington
Lewayne D. Gilchrist
Lewayne D. Gilchrist University of Washington
King K. Holmes
King K. Holmes University of Washington
Richard F. Catalano
Richard F. Catalano University of Washington
Matthew R. Golden
Matthew R. Golden University of Washington
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a major opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students interested in human behavior and wellness also consider social work, counseling, or mental health services. These fields often require advanced credentials, depending on the state and the specific practice area.

For example, determining the degree needed to be a social worker in Maine will help you chart a path toward state licensure and practice. Requirements can vary significantly across different regions, so it’s important to research carefully. Understanding the degree needed to be a social worker in Maryland may reveal unique coursework, practicum hours, or licensing examinations not required elsewhere.

Similarly, those looking into social worker education requirements in Massachusetts or social worker education requirements in Michigan will find that online and hybrid programs can help meet educational thresholds while providing flexibility. Exploring these options is a strategic way to align your psychology studies with diverse, meaningful career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Diane M. Morrison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles