World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6219 3369 85 7956

Mary Rogers Gillmore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Rogers Gillmore between 1980 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Rogers Gillmore published across 33 years, from 1980 to 2012, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1992. 3 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1992. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication
1980 2012

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Rogers Gillmore: publications per year, 1980 to 2012
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 7
1993 3
1994 5
1995 4
1996 4
1997 2
1998 5
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 6
2003 4
2004 1
2005 5
2006 3
2007 6
2008 5
2009 1
2010 7
2011 2
2012 1
Total 88
Download as CSV

Mary Rogers Gillmore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Rogers Gillmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 85
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Rogers Gillmore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Rogers Gillmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Rogers Gillmore is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in higher education and research within this institution.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications listed for Mary Rogers Gillmore. Likewise, no detailed information is available regarding their main fields or subfields of study, nor the specific topics they have worked on.

There is no record of awards won by Mary Rogers Gillmore in the provided data.

This overview is based strictly on the available data, which indicates their current active status and institutional association.

Best Publications

  • The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results

    K. S. Cook;R. M. Emerson;M. R. Gillmore;T. Yamagishi

  • Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks

    Toshio Yamagishi;Mary R. Gillmore;Karen S. Cook

  • Using Focus Groups to Discuss Sensitive Topics with Children

    Marilyn J. Hoppe;Elizabeth A. Wells;Diane M. Morrison;Mary R. Gillmore

  • Teen sexual behavior: applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action.

    Mary Rogers Gillmore;Matthew E. Archibald;Diane M. Morrison;Anthony Wilsdon

  • Are Multiracial Adolescents at Greater Risk? Comparisons of Rates, Patterns, and Correlates of Substance Use and Violence Between Monoracial and Multiracial Adolescents

    Youngsoo Choi;Tracy W. Harachi;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Richard F. Catalano

  • Ethnic differences in family factors related to early drug initiation.

    R F Catalano;D M Morrison;E A Wells;M R Gillmore

  • Sex education as health promotion: What does it take?

    Herman P. Schaalma;Charles Abraham;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Gerjo Kok

  • Structure of problem behaviors in preadolescence.

    Gillmore Mr;Hawkins Jd;Catalano Rf;Day Le

  • Racial Differences in Acceptability and Availability of Drugs and Early Initiation of Substance Use

    M R Gillmore;R F Catalano;D M Morrison;E A Wells

  • Toward an understanding of (em)power(ment) for HIV/AIDS prevention with adolescent women

    Lorraine Gutiérrez;Hyun Joo Oh;Mary Rogers Gillmore

  • Condom use, frequency of sex, and number of partners: multidimensional characterization of adolescent sexual risk-taking.

    Blair Beadnell;Diane M. Morrison;Anthony Wilsdon;Elizabeth A. Wells

  • Determinants of Condom Use Among High-Risk Heterosexual Adults: A Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action1

    Diane M. Morrison;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Sharon A. Baker

  • Adolescent drinking and sex: findings from a daily diary study.

    Diane M. Morrison;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Marilyn J. Hoppe;Jan Gaylord

  • Using research to guide culturally appropriate drug abuse prevention.

    Richard F. Catalano;J. David Hawkins;Claudia Krenz;Mary Gillmore

  • Longitudinal Effects of Domestic Violence on Employment and Welfare Outcomes

    Taryn Lindhorst;Monica Oxford;Mary Rogers Gillmore

  • Differences by Gender and Sexual Experience in Adolescent Sexual Behavior: Implications for Education and HIV Prevention

    Deborah Nahom;Elizabeth Wells;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Marilyn Hoppe

  • Drinking and Condom use: Results from an Event-Based Daily Diary

    Barbara C. Leigh;Jan Gaylord Vanslyke;Marilyn J. Hoppe;Damian T. Rainey

  • Comparison of Diary and Retrospective Measures for Recording Alcohol Consumption and Sexual Activity

    Barbara C Leigh;Mary R Gillmore;Diane M Morrison

  • Substance use and other factors associated with risky sexual behavior among pregnant adolescents

    Mary Rogers Gillmore;Sandra S. Butler;Mary Jane Lohr;Lewayne Gilchrist

  • Children's Decisions About Substance Use: An Application and Extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action1

    Diane M. Morrison;Edith E. Simpson;Mary Rogers Gillmore;Elizabeth A. Wells

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane M. Morrison
Diane M. Morrison University of Washington
Lewayne D. Gilchrist
Lewayne D. Gilchrist University of Washington
Richard F. Catalano
Richard F. Catalano University of Washington
Elizabeth A. Wells
Elizabeth A. Wells University of Washington
Toshio Yamagishi
Toshio Yamagishi Hitotsubashi University
Karen S. Cook
Karen S. Cook Stanford University
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
Robert D. Abbott
Robert D. Abbott University of Washington
Susan J. Spieker
Susan J. Spieker University of Washington
Lorraine M. Gutiérrez
Lorraine M. Gutiérrez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers and flexible online degree options. Many students are drawn to specialized roles like Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which offer the chance to make a real impact in behavioral health. Requirements for becoming a BCBA can vary by city and state, so it’s important to research local guidelines. For example, you can find detailed information about becoming a bcba in Washington DC, bcba certification requirements in Wichita, and becoming a bcba in Winston Salem.

Another sought-after role is licensed mental health counselor, which also requires meeting specific state certifications. If you’re interested in this path, learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Albuquerque—a great starting point for understanding general requirements. By exploring online degrees and career-focused programs, students can tailor their education to match their goals and local licensing standards.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Rogers Gillmore

Recently Published Articles