World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
69
Citations
19331
World Ranking
809
National Ranking
48

Karen Mann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Mann sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Karen Mann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Mann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen Mann was affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada. Their recent research contributions were primarily published in the journal Medical Education between 2020 and 2021. The papers published included multiple editions of "Issue Information," reflecting ongoing editorial or issue-related work within the field.

Their recent papers are as follows:

  • "Issue Information", 2020, Medical Education
  • "Issue Information", 2020, Medical Education
  • "Issue Information", 2020, Medical Education
  • "Issue Information", 2020, Medical Education
  • "Issue Information", 2021, Medical Education

Karen Mann frequently collaborated with several co-authors, indicating a network of research partnerships. Notable frequent co-authors included:

  • Halifax Angel
  • Centeno Buenos
  • Aires Diana
  • Dolmans Maastricht
  • Elizabeth Farmer

Their publications were concentrated in the venue Medical Education, where they contributed at least five papers.

Best Publications

  • Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review

    Karen Mann;Jill Gordon;Anna MacLeod

  • A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.

    Yvonne Steinert;Karen Mann;Angel Centeno;Diana Dolmans

  • A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40

    Yvonne Steinert;Karen Mann;Brownell Anderson;Bonnie Maureen Barnett

  • Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities.

    Karen V Mann

  • Role modeling in physicians' professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy

    Nuala P. Kenny;Karen V. Mann;Heather MacLeod

  • Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes

    Kevin W. Eva;Heather Armson;Eric Holmboe;Jocelyn Lockyer

  • Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19

    Yvonne Steinert;Laura Naismith;Karen Mann

  • The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model.

    Joan Sargeant;Heather Armson;Ben Chesluk;Timothy Dornan

  • Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback

    Joan M. Sargeant;Karen V. Mann;Cees P. van der Vleuten;Job F. Metsemakers

  • Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2).

    Joan Sargeant;Jocelyn Lockyer;Karen Mann;Eric Holmboe

  • The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 – blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk

    Raj S. Padwal;Brenda R. Hemmelgarn;Finlay A. McAlister;Donald W. McKay

  • Teaching and Learning in Medical Education: How Theory can Inform Practice

    David M Kaufman;Karen V Mann

  • Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use

    Joan Sargeant;Karen Mann;Douglas Sinclair;Cees Van der Vleuten

  • Orienting Teaching Toward the Learning Process

    Olle ten Cate;Linda Snell;Karen Mann;Jan Vermunt

  • What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives.

    Kalpana Nair;Lisa Dolovich;Alan Cassels;James McCormack

  • Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature.

    Rashmi A. Kusurkar;Gerda Croiset;Karen V. Mann;Eugene Custers

  • International handbook of research in medical education

    Geoff R. Norman;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten;David I. Newble;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

  • Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness

    Joan Sargeant;Karen Mann;Suzanne Ferrier

  • Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict.

    Karen Mann;Cees van der Vleuten;Kevin Eva;Heather Armson

  • "Directed" self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context.

    Joan Sargeant;Karen Mann;Cees van der Vleuten;Job Metsemakers

  • Medical Education: Theory and Practice

    Tim Dornan;Karen Mann;Albert Scherpbier;John Spencer

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan Sargeant
Joan Sargeant Dalhousie University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Jocelyn Lockyer
Jocelyn Lockyer University of Calgary
Sarah Peters
Sarah Peters University of Manchester
Yvonne Steinert
Yvonne Steinert McGill University
Tim Dornan
Tim Dornan Queen's University Belfast
John Spencer
John Spencer Newcastle University
Miriam Stewart
Miriam Stewart University of Alberta
Paul M. O'Neill
Paul M. O'Neill University of Liverpool
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse educational paths and careers. Many students are now opting for online degrees due to their flexibility, affordability, and fast-track options. If you wish to enter clinical practice, consider accelerated psyd programs to quickly gain advanced psychological expertise. For those passionate about family and relationship counseling, specialized mft programs offer a direct path to becoming a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Budget is a key factor for many students. It’s important to assess how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology to make informed financial decisions about your education.

For those interested in leadership, education, or research-based roles, there are fastest online edd programs that help you achieve your doctorate in less time.

Each online pathway offers unique benefits and prepares you for various rewarding careers across education, counseling, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Mann

Recently Published Articles