World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 114 743 709 452 428 556 46215
Medicine 116 4369 4095 2384 2206 543 47423

Dana B. Barr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dana B. Barr between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dana B. Barr published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 24.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2006. 73 of the 714 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2006. 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 57 publications 2007: 34 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 50 publications 2025: 56 publications 2026: 17 publications
1998 2026

714 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dana B. Barr: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 4
1999 7
2000 5
2001 5
2002 15
2003 19
2004 26
2005 27
2006 57
2007 34
2008 32
2009 28
2010 30
2011 34
2012 19
2013 18
2014 22
2015 25
2016 30
2017 15
2018 18
2019 16
2020 23
2021 30
2022 30
2023 22
2024 50
2025 56
2026 17
Total 714
Download as CSV

Dana B. Barr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana B. Barr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 543 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 543
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dana B. Barr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana B. Barr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 116
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Dana B. Barr is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research focuses significantly on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Plant Science.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure, maternal metabolomic perturbation, and fetal growth in African American women: A meet-in-the-middle approach, 2021, Environment International
  • Design and Rationale of the HAPIN Study: A Multicountry Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove and Continuous Fuel Distribution, 2020, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Pesticide use in Thailand: Current situation, health risks, and gaps in research and policy, 2020, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal
  • Newborn metabolomic signatures of maternal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance exposure and reduced length of gestation, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Serum per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) concentrations and predictors of exposure among pregnant African American women in the Atlanta area, Georgia, 2020, Environmental Research

Dana B. Barr's frequent co-authors include Parinya Panuwet, P. Barry Ryan, Anne L. Dunlop, Donghai Liang, and Stephanie M. Eick.

Key publication venues where Barr has frequently contributed are:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Environmental Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental Health Perspectives

The scientist's main fields of study are Environmental Science, with notable specialization in the following subfields:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Plant Science

Their research covers several central topics including:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Best Publications

  • Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements.

    Dana B. Barr;Lynn C. Wilder;Samuel P. Caudill;Amanda J. Gonzalez

  • Urinary levels of seven phthalate metabolites in the U.S. population from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000.

    Manori J Silva;Dana B Barr;John A Reidy;Nicole A Malek

  • Impact of Prenatal Chlorpyrifos Exposure on Neurodevelopment in the First 3 Years of Life Among Inner-City Children

    Virginia A. Rauh;Robin Garfinkel;Frederica P. Perera;Howard F. Andrews

  • Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Neurodevelopment in Young Mexican-American Children

    Brenda Eskenazi;Amy R. Marks;Asa Bradman;Kim Harley

  • Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphate Pesticides and IQ in 7-Year Old Children

    Maryse F. Bouchard;Jonathan Chevrier;Kim G. Harley;Katherine Kogut

  • Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population.

    Frederica P. Perera;Virginia Rauh;Wei Yann Tsai;Patrick Kinney

  • Seven-Year Neurodevelopmental Scores and Prenatal Exposure to Chlorpyrifos, a Common Agricultural Pesticide

    Virginia Rauh;Srikesh Arunajadai;Megan Horton;Frederica Perera

  • Prenatal Insecticide Exposures and Birth Weight and Length among an Urban Minority Cohort

    Robin M. Whyatt;Virginia Rauh;Dana B. Barr;David E. Camann

  • Organic Diets Significantly Lower Children’s Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Pesticides

    Chensheng Lu;Kathryn Toepel;Rene Irish;Richard A. Fenske

  • Effect of prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children.

    Frederica P. Perera;Virginia Rauh;Robin M. Whyatt;Wei Yann Tsai;Wei Yann Tsai

  • Phthalate exposure and human semen parameters.

    Susan M. Duty;Manori J. Silva;Dana B. Barr;John W. Brock

  • Association of in Utero Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Fetal Growth and Length of Gestation in an Agricultural Population

    Brenda Eskenazi;Kim Harley;Asa Bradman;Erin K Weltzien

  • Brain anomalies in children exposed prenatally to a common organophosphate pesticide.

    Virginia A. Rauh;Frederica P. Perera;Megan K. Horton;Robin M. Whyatt

  • Semen Quality in Relation to Biomarkers of Pesticide Exposure

    Shanna H. Swan;Robin L. Kruse;Fan Liu;Dana B. Barr

  • Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood.

    Stephanie M. Engel;James Wetmur;Jia Chen;Chenbo Zhu

  • Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Attention in Young Mexican-American Children: The CHAMACOS Study

    Amy R. Marks;Kim Harley;Asa Bradman;Katherine Kogut

  • Urinary concentrations of metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in the general U.S. population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.

    Dana Boyd Barr;Anders O. Olsson;Lee Yang Wong;Simeon Udunka

  • The relationship between environmental exposures to phthalates and DNA damage in human sperm using the neutral comet assay.

    Susan M. Duty;Narendra P Singh;Manori J Silva;Dana B Barr

  • Variability and Predictors of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations during Pregnancy

    Joe M. Braun;Amy E. Kalkbrenner;Antonia M. Calafat;John T. Bernert

  • ASSOCIATION OF IN UTERO ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDE EXPOSURE AND FETAL GROWTH AND LENGTH OF GESTATION IN AN AGRICULTURAL POPULATION

    L Fenster;B Eskenazi;M Anderson;A Bradman

Frequent Co-Authors

Asa Bradman
Asa Bradman University of California, Berkeley
Brenda Eskenazi
Brenda Eskenazi University of California, Berkeley
Robin M. Whyatt
Robin M. Whyatt Columbia University
Germaine M. Buck Louis
Germaine M. Buck Louis George Mason University
Frederica P. Perera
Frederica P. Perera Columbia University
Antonia M. Calafat
Antonia M. Calafat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
John R. Barr
John R. Barr Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Virginia Rauh
Virginia Rauh Columbia University
David Camann
David Camann Southwest Research Institute
Thomas A. Arcury
Thomas A. Arcury Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medicine, a variety of online programs offer flexible and accelerated pathways. Shorter graduate nursing programs are particularly popular for advancing careers quickly. Those seeking to become advanced practice nurses can explore the shortest dnp programs online, which are designed for working professionals aiming to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently.

Students may also want to look into the shortest dnp program options, which prioritize both speed and accessibility. These programs allow experienced nurses to reach leadership roles with a reduced time commitment, which can be a major advantage for those balancing work and study.

If you are starting out or seeking entry-level roles, fast track lpn programs provide a streamlined route to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse through fully online or hybrid learning. Additionally, students interested in mental health can consider the fastest pmhnp program selections for rapid entry into psychiatric nurse practitioner roles. These online pathways offer flexibility, saving both time and resources while opening diverse opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Dana B. Barr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles