World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4457 4119 2119 1922 281 7188

Judith E. Bosmans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judith E. Bosmans between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judith E. Bosmans published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2019. 51 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2019. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 25 publications
2004 2025

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judith E. Bosmans: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 7
2009 1
2010 10
2011 11
2012 17
2013 15
2014 16
2015 22
2016 28
2017 31
2018 22
2019 32
2020 24
2021 20
2022 21
2023 19
2024 26
2025 25
Total 358
Download as CSV

Judith E. Bosmans publications per year - data summary

  • Judith E. Bosmans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, has 358 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 32 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2004 and 2009, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 16.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.3 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 111 publications, 31% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 40 publications (5.0 per year); 2012-2019: 183 publications (22.9 per year); 2020-2025: 135 publications (22.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Judith E. Bosmans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith E. Bosmans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 281 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 281
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Judith E. Bosmans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Judith E. Bosmans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, records 281 publications - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Judith E. Bosmans, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Judith E. Bosmans ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Judith E. Bosmans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith E. Bosmans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Judith E. Bosmans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Judith E. Bosmans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, records 43 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Judith E. Bosmans, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Judith E. Bosmans ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Judith E. Bosmans is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Surgery.

The scientist's work spans multiple important topics within health and medical research. These topics include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Judith E. Bosmans has contributed to numerous publications, with a frequent presence in several notable journals. The main venues for their research publication include:

  • BMJ Open
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • PLoS ONE
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • BMC Psychiatry

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Bosmans are the following:

  • "The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients," 2020, The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles," 2020, BMJ Open
  • "Nurse-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in General Practice: Results from a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial," 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • "The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!," 2021, BMC Health Services Research

The scientist frequently collaborates with several peers, including:

  • Johanna M. van Dongen
  • Ângela Jornada Ben
  • Mohamed El Alili
  • Maurits W. van Tulder
  • Hana M. Broulíková

Best Publications

  • What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis.

    Karen M. van Leeuwen;Miriam S. van Loon;Fenna A. van Nes;Judith E. Bosmans

  • Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

    L.C. Lambeek;J.E. Bosmans;B.J. van Royen;M.W. van Tulder

  • European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries.

    Annet Kleiboer;Jan Smit;Judith Bosmans;Jeroen Ruwaard

  • Post-discharge nutritional support in malnourished elderly individuals improves functional limitations

    Floor Neelemaat;Judith E. Bosmans;Abel Thijs;Jaap C. Seidell

  • Short-term oral nutritional intervention with protein and vitamin D decreases falls in malnourished older adults.

    RD Floor Neelemaat MSc;Paul Lips Md;Judith E. Bosmans;Abel Thijs Md

  • Comparing measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O, and ASCOT in frail older adults.

    Karen M van Leeuwen;Judith E Bosmans;Aaltje P D Jansen;Emiel O Hoogendijk

  • Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016.

    Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro;Caroline Ribeiro Tottoli;Daniela da Silva Rodrigues;Judith E. Bosmans

  • The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients.

    Sanne J.E. Bruijniks;Lotte H.J.M. Lemmens;Steven D. Hollon;Frenk P.M.L. Peeters

  • The effect of a programme to improve men’s sedentary time and physical activity : The european fans in training (EuroFIT) randomised controlled trial

    Sally Wyke;Christopher Bunn;Eivind Andersen;Marlene N. Silva

  • Potential Savings of a Program to Prevent Ankle Sprain Recurrence Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Maarten D. W. Hupperets;Evert A. L. M. Verhagen;Evert A. L. M. Verhagen;Martijn W. Heymans;Judith E. Bosmans

  • Economic evaluation of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer disease

    Hein P.J. van Hout;Judith E. Bosmans;Wim A.B. Stalman

  • Trial-based economic evaluations in occupational health: principles, methods, and recommendations.

    J.M. van Dongen;M.F. van Wier;E. Tompa;P.M. Bongers

  • Oral nutritional support in malnourished elderly decreases functional limitations with no extra costs.

    Floor Neelemaat;Judith E. Bosmans;Abel Thijs;Jaap C. Seidell

  • Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic ileocaecal resection versus infliximab treatment of terminal ileitis in Crohn's disease: the LIR!C Trial.

    E Joline de Groof;Toer W Stevens;Emma J Eshuis;Tjibbe J Gardenbroek

  • Cost-Effectiveness of a Chronic Care Model for Frail Older Adults in Primary Care: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial

    Karen M. van Leeuwen;Karen M. van Leeuwen;Judith E. Bosmans;Aaltje P. D. Jansen;Emiel O. Hoogendijk;Emiel O. Hoogendijk

  • Cost effectiveness of a pharmacy-based coaching programme to improve adherence to antidepressants.

    Judith E. Bosmans;Oscar H. Brook;Hein P. J. van Hout;Martine C. de Bruijne

  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial

    Marco M Blom;Judith E Bosmans;Pim Cuijpers;Steve H Zarit

  • Exploration of the content validity and feasibility of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O and ASCOT in older adults

    Karen M van Leeuwen;Karen M van Leeuwen;Aaltje P D Jansen;Maaike E Muntinga;Judith E Bosmans

  • The effect of treatment as usual on major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis.

    Spyros Kolovos;Maurits W. van Tulder;Pim Cuijpers;Amélie Prigent

  • Optimizing psychotherapy dosage for comorbid depression and personality disorders (PsyDos): a pragmatic randomized factorial trial using schema therapy and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

    Marit Kool;Henricus L. Van;Anna Bartak;Saskia C. M. de Maat

  • Cardiometabolic risk factors and quality of life in severely obese children and adolescents in The Netherlands.

    Sabine Makkes;Carry M Renders;Judith E Bosmans;Olga H van der Baan-Slootweg

  • Clinical effectiveness of usual care with or without antidepressant medication for primary care patients with minor or mild-major depression: a randomized equivalence trial.

    Marleen L.M. Hermens;Hein P.J. van Hout;Berend Terluin;Herman J. Adèr

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Willem van Mechelen
Willem van Mechelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jacob C. Seidell
Jacob C. Seidell Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Annemieke van Straten
Annemieke van Straten Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rose-Marie Dröes
Rose-Marie Dröes University of Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest grows in Social Sciences and Humanities, many students are exploring flexible ways to advance their education and careers. The U.S. offers a wide variety of online programs that cater to these interests, including the best online masters in psychology for those looking to deepen their understanding of human behavior and mental health.

For those seeking leadership roles in education, accelerated edd programs online offer a fast track to an advanced doctoral degree, opening doors to academic, administrative, and policy careers. Similarly, one-year and expedited options have become increasingly popular. The best master degree online programs allow for rapid completion, making them ideal for working professionals and career changers.

Undergraduates can also benefit from accelerated online degree pathways, which reduce the time and cost required to earn a bachelor's degree in a social science or humanities field. These diverse online offerings enable students to balance studies with work or family commitments, while still preparing for meaningful careers in education, counseling, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Judith E. Bosmans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles