World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
48
Citations
6900
World Ranking
1113
National Ranking
39

Paul Upham publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Upham sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 181 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Paul Upham D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Upham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Upham is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Pollution.

The core topics of their work cover areas such as Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Energy and Environment Impacts, Green IT and Sustainability, Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development, Environmental Education and Sustainability, and Risk Perception and Management.

Frequent venues for Upham's publications include Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Energy Research & Social Science, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Sustainability, and Political Geography. These represent interdisciplinary platforms that bridge energy systems, environmental governance, and societal transformation topics.

Their recent papers are:

  • Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice, 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • The revolution is conditional? The conditionality of hydrogen fuel cell expectations in five European countries, 2020, Energy Research & Social Science

Paul Upham has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Benjamin K. Sovacool, Paula Maria Bögel, Rita Klapper, Chukwuka G. Monyei, and Katinka Johansen. Collaboration appears sustained and consistent across different research projects.

Overall, the research trajectory aligns with interdisciplinary approaches linking technology, society, and environmental change, particularly emphasizing governance frameworks and social dimensions in the transition toward sustainable energy and environmental systems.

Best Publications

  • International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century

    Stuart B. Capstick;Lorraine E. Whitmarsh;Wouter Poortinga;Nicholas Frank Pidgeon

  • Voluntary carbon offsetting schemes for aviation: efficiency, credibility and sustainable tourism.

    Stefan Gössling;John Broderick;Paul Upham;Jean-Paul Ceron

  • Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy

    Chris J. Martin;Paul Upham;Leslie Budd

  • Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions

    Paul Upham;Leonie Dendler;Mercedes Bleda

  • Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems

    Paul Upham;Christian Oltra;Àlex Boso

  • Environmental capacity and airport operations: current issues and future prospects

    Paul Upham;Callum Thomas;David Gillingwater;David Raper

  • Grassroots social innovation and the mobilisation of values in collaborative consumption: a conceptual model

    Chris J. Martin;Paul Upham

  • Towards Sustainable Aviation

    Paul Upham;Janet Maughan;David Raper;Callum Thomas

  • The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors. Part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation

    Simon Shackley;David Reiner;Paul Upham;Heleen de Coninck

  • UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support

    Lorraine Whitmarsh;Nicholas Nash;Paul Upham;Alyson Lloyd

  • Climate Change and Aviation. Issues, Challenges and Solutions.

    Stefan Gössling;Paul Upham

  • Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio-CCS)

    Clair Gough;Paul Upham

  • Argentinean soy-based biodiesel: An introduction to production and impacts

    Julia Tomei;Paul Upham

  • Energy model, boundary object and societal lens: 35 years of the MARKAL model in the UK

    Peter G. Taylor;Paul Upham;Will McDowall;David Christopherson

  • Public perceptions of CCS: Emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications

    Paul Upham;Paul Upham;Paul Upham;Thomas Roberts

  • Democratising platform governance in the sharing economy: An analytical framework and initial empirical insights

    Chris J. Martin;Paul Upham;Paul Upham;Rita Klapper

  • Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options

    Patricia Thornley;Paul Upham;Ye Huang;Sina Rezvani

  • Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour

    Rebecca Rhead;Mark Elliot;Paul Upham

  • The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for governance of renewable energy planning

    Paul Upham;Simon Shackley

  • Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results.

    P. Upham;Simon Shackley

  • The role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions literature : A review and discussion in relation to consumption and technology acceptance

    Paula Maria Bögel;Paul Upham

  • The role of attitudes in technology acceptance management: Reflections on the case of hydrogen fuel cells in Europe

    Paula Bögel;Christian Oltra;Roser Sala;Monica Lores

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Shackley
Simon Shackley University of Edinburgh
Lorraine Whitmarsh
Lorraine Whitmarsh University of Bath
Wouter Poortinga
Wouter Poortinga Cardiff University
Paula Kivimaa
Paula Kivimaa University of Sussex
Stefan Gössling
Stefan Gössling Linnaeus University
Patrick Devine-Wright
Patrick Devine-Wright University of Exeter
Les Levidow
Les Levidow The Open University
Sander van der Linden
Sander van der Linden University of Cambridge
Ye Huang
Ye Huang University of Ulster
Daniel Scott
Daniel Scott University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Business and Management opens up a range of flexible and affordable options for students worldwide. Choosing an online degrees accredited by recognized institutions is essential to ensure quality education and future career recognition.

For those seeking advanced knowledge, pursuing an affordable master's degree online can help you balance cost and convenience without sacrificing educational standards. Specialized fields such as data analysis are also gaining ground, with many choosing to enhance their leadership and technical skills through top data science programs.

Ambitious professionals aiming for executive roles may consider an organizational leadership phd, which can prepare graduates for transformative leadership positions in today’s complex business landscape. Whatever your career goals, the variety of accredited and affordable online programs in the US means there’s a pathway designed to suit your aspirations and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Upham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles