World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 56 1889 1706 18 17 205 12795

James Higham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Higham between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Higham published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2007. 14 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2007. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 30 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
1994 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Higham: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 3
2000 0
2001 2
2002 5
2003 7
2004 5
2005 24
2006 1
2007 30
2008 5
2009 2
2010 6
2011 5
2012 3
2013 7
2014 21
2015 15
2016 11
2017 7
2018 5
2019 14
2020 10
2021 17
2022 8
2023 6
2024 9
2025 5
Total 237
Download as CSV

James Higham publications per year - data summary

  • James Higham, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Otago, has 237 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1994 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1996 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 32 years in the span carry no publications at all (1995, 1997 and 2000).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.2 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 45 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1994-2004: 26 publications (2.4 per year); 2005-2015: 119 publications (10.8 per year); 2016-2025: 92 publications (9.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

James Higham publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Higham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 205
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

James Higham publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • James Higham, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Otago, records 205 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than James Higham, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and James Higham ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

James Higham D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Higham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109 56
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

James Higham D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • James Higham, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Otago, records 56 D-Index - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than James Higham, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and James Higham ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

James Higham is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand and specializes in social sciences, with a specific focus on sociology, political science, social psychology, geography, planning and development, and transportation. Their research explores various dimensions of tourism and sustainability, with significant engagement in environmental education and climate change communication.

The scientist's recent publications include the following:

  • "An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19" (2020, Nature)
  • "The Low-Carbon Imperative: Destination Management under Urgent Climate Change" (2020, Journal of Travel Research)
  • "Justice and ethics: towards a new platform for tourism and sustainability" (2020, Journal of Sustainable Tourism)
  • "Managing tourism emissions through optimizing the tourism demand mix: Concept and analysis" (2020, Tourism Management)
  • "Drivers of global tourism carbon emissions" (2024, Nature Communications)

Key publication venues where James Higham frequently contributes include:

  • Journal of Sustainable Tourism
  • Journal of Travel Research
  • Tourism Geographies
  • Tourism Management
  • Energy Research & Social Science

Their main fields of study comprise:

  • Social Sciences

Important subfields are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation

James Higham's research addresses main topics such as:

  • Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Conferences and Exhibitions Management
  • Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James Higham include:

  • Debbie Hopkins
  • Stefan Gößling
  • Eivind Farstad
  • Iratxe Landa-Mata
  • Ya-Yen Sun

Best Publications

  • Sport tourism development

    Thomas Hinch;James E. S. Higham

  • Sport tourism: a framework for research

    T. D. Hinch;J. E. S. Higham

  • Tourism, sport and seasons: the challenges and potential of overcoming seasonality in the sport and tourism sectors

    James Higham;Tom Hinch

  • Commentary - Sport as an Avenue of Tourism Development: An Analysis of the Positive and Negative Impacts of Sport Tourism

    James Higham

  • Tourism, recreation and climate change.

    C. M. Hall;James E. S. Higham

  • Twenty-five years of sustainable tourism and the Journal of Sustainable Tourism: looking back and moving forward

    Bill Bramwell;James Higham;Bernard Lane;Graham Miller

  • Managing the impacts of dolphin-based tourism through the definition of critical habitats: the case of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand

    D. Lusseau;J.E.S. Higham

  • Sustainable Market Orientation: A New Approach to Managing Marketing Strategy

    Robert W. Mitchell;Ben Wooliscroft;James Higham

  • Resilience and sustainability: a complementary relationship? Towards a practical conceptual model for the sustainability–resilience nexus in tourism

    Stephen Espiner;Caroline Orchiston;James Higham

  • Binge flying: Behavioural addiction and climate change

    Scott A. Cohen;James E. S. Higham;Christina T. Cavaliere

  • Critical Issues in Ecotourism: understanding a complex tourism phenomenon

    James E. S Higham

  • An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19.

    Milan Klöwer;Debbie Hopkins;Myles Allen;James Higham

  • Are technology myths stalling aviation climate policy

    Paul Peeters;James Higham;Diana Kutzner;Scott Cohen

  • Climate change, tourist air travel and radical emissions reduction

    James Higham;James Higham;Scott A Cohen;Christina T Cavaliere;Arianne Carvalhedo Reis

  • Canary in the coalmine: Norwegian attitudes towards climate change and extreme long-haul air travel to Aotearoa/New Zealand

    James E.S. Higham;Scott A. Cohen

  • Can we fly less? Evaluating the ‘necessity’ of air travel

    Stefan Gössling;Stefan Gössling;Stefan Gössling;Paul Hanna;James Higham;Scott Cohen

  • Urban ecotourism: a contradiction in terms?

    James Higham;Michael Lück

  • Tourists and albatrosses: the dynamics of tourism at the Northern Royal Albatross Colony, Taiaroa Head, New Zealand

    J. E. S. Higham

  • The Low-Carbon Imperative: Destination Management under Urgent Climate Change

    Stefan Gössling;James Higham

  • Eyes wide shut? UK consumer perceptions on aviation climate impacts and travel decisions to New Zealand

    Scott Allen Cohen;James E.S. Higham

  • Knowledge management and tourism recovery (de)marketing: the Christchurch earthquakes 2010–2011

    C. Orchiston;J.E.S. Higham

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. Cohen
Scott A. Cohen University of Surrey
Stefan Gössling
Stefan Gössling Linnaeus University
Lars Bejder
Lars Bejder University of Hawaii at Manoa
David Lusseau
David Lusseau Technical University of Denmark
Rob Williams
Rob Williams Oceans Initiative
Ghazali Musa
Ghazali Musa University of Malaya
Susanne Becken
Susanne Becken Griffith University
Daniel Scott
Daniel Scott University of Waterloo
Geoffrey Wall
Geoffrey Wall University of Waterloo
Sander van der Linden
Sander van der Linden University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Social Sciences or Humanities, online learning provides flexible options for working adults and recent graduates alike. Many accredited universities offer one year masters programs online in fields such as Psychology, History, and Sociology—helping advance your career quickly and efficiently.

For those looking to earn an undergraduate degree, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults let you complete your studies in less time than traditional formats, without sacrificing quality. This is especially helpful for career changers or professionals seeking to upskill.

More specialized fields such as clinical social work and behavior analysis are also accessible through online platforms. Aspiring social workers can investigate msw programs that focus on affordability and flexibility. Those interested in applied behavior analysis can learn about bcba certification online cost to find the most budget-friendly certification options.

Exploring these online pathways can save you time and money, while broadening your career prospects in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing James Higham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles