World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
85
Citations
31109
World Ranking
1179
National Ranking
733

Filip Smit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Smit sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 291 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Filip Smit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Smit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

    Linda Bolier;Merel Haverman;Gerben J Westerhof;Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper

  • Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis.

    Dan Chisholm;Kim Sweeny;Peter Sheehan;Bruce Rasmussen

  • Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies.

    Pim Cuijpers;Filip Smit

  • Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of prospective studies

    P. Cuijpers;P. Cuijpers;F. Smit

  • The Structure and Stability of Common Mental Disorders: The NEMESIS Study

    Wilma A. M. Vollebergh;Jurjen Iedema;Rob V. Bijl;Ron de Graaf

  • Preventing the Onset of Depressive Disorders: A Meta-Analytic Review of Psychological Interventions

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Filip Smit;Cathrine Mihalopoulos

  • Effects of reminiscence and life review on late-life depression: a meta-analysis

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Filip Smit;Pim Cuijpers

  • Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in substance use disorder patients: A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

    Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Geurt van de Glind;Wim van den Brink;Filip Smit;Filip Smit

  • The effects of reminiscence on psychological well-being in older adults: a meta-analysis

    Ernst Bohlmeijer;Marte Roemer;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Filip Smit;Filip Smit

  • Risk factors for 12-month comorbidity of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study.

    Ron de Graaf;Rob V Bijl;Filip Smit;Wilma A M Vollebergh

  • Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias

    P. Cuijpers;Filip Smit;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;Steven D. Hollon

  • Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions

    Kim van Zoonen;Claudia Buntrock;David Daniel Ebert;Filip Smit

  • Costs of nine common mental disorders: Implications for curative and preventive psychiatry

    Filip Smit;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Jan Oostenbrink;Neeltje Batelaan

  • Prevention of Major Depression

    Ricardo F. Muñoz;Pim Cuijpers;Filip Smit;Alinne Z. Barrera

  • Preventing a first episode of psychosis: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups

    Mark van der Gaag;Filip Smit;Andreas Bechdolf;Paul French

  • Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an 'individual patient data' meta-analysis

    Eirini Karyotaki;Annet M. Kleiboer;Filip Smit;David Trevor Turner

  • Psychiatric and Sociodemographic Predictors of Attrition in a Longitudinal Study The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

    Ron de Graaf;Rob V. Bijl;Filip Smit;Anneloes Ravelli

  • Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial.

    Petronella J. van't Veer-Tazelaar;Harm W. J. van Marwijk;Patricia van Oppen;Hein P. J. van Hout

  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Peter Bower;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Alex Sutton;Tony Kendrick

  • Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial

    Heleen Riper;Jeannet Kramer;Filip Smit;Barbara Conijn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles