World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 878 767 48 45 298 33076

Annemieke van Straten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annemieke van Straten between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annemieke van Straten published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 39 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 26 publications
1994 2025

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annemieke van Straten: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 8
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 4
2006 8
2007 7
2008 12
2009 23
2010 19
2011 17
2012 9
2013 11
2014 16
2015 9
2016 11
2017 11
2018 10
2019 26
2020 21
2021 30
2022 15
2023 13
2024 13
2025 26
Total 325
Download as CSV

Annemieke van Straten publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemieke van Straten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 298 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 298
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Annemieke van Straten D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemieke van Straten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Annemieke van Straten is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research centers primarily on psychology, with an emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Their scholarly work includes contributions to applied psychology and psychiatry and mental health fields.

The main topics van Straten covers include sleep and related disorders, sleep and wakefulness research, and digital mental health interventions. Other notable areas of research are child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, mental health treatment and access, and circadian rhythm and melatonin.

Van Straten has published multiple papers in prominent venues. Some recent publications include:

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • The European Insomnia Guideline: An update on the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia 2023, 2023, Journal of Sleep Research
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with mental disorders and comorbid insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Sleep Medicine Reviews
  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, BMC Public Health

Their frequent co-authors include Pim Cuijpers, Heleen Riper, Jaap Lancee, Tanja van der Zweerde, and Eirini Karyotaki. These collaborations indicate a focused network around mental health and psychological treatment research.

Van Straten's work is documented in several publication venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Trials, BMC Psychiatry, Internet Interventions, and Research Square. This suggests a broad dissemination of research outputs within psychological and medical fields.

Best Publications

  • Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Gerhard Andersson;Patricia van Oppen

  • Behavioral activation treatments of depression: A meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Lisanne Warmerdam

  • Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    P Cuijpers;T Donker;A van Straten;J Li

  • Depression and obesity: a meta-analysis of community-based studies.

    Leonore de Wit;Floriana Luppino;Annemieke van Straten;Brenda Penninx

  • Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta‐analysis of diagnostic interviews and self‐report instruments

    A M H Krebber;L M Buffart;G Kleijn;I C Riepma

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size

    P. Cuijpers;A. van Straten;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;S.D. Hollon

  • Cognitive and behavioral therapies in the treatment of insomnia: A meta-analysis

    Annemieke van Straten;Tanja van der Zweerde;Annet Kleiboer;Pim Cuijpers

  • Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Anna S. Geraedts;Patricia van Oppen;Gerhard Andersson

  • Behavioural activation for depression; an update of meta-analysis of effectiveness and sub group analysis.

    David Ekers;Lisa Webster;Annemieke Van Straten;Pim Cuijpers

  • Preventing the Onset of Depressive Disorders: A Meta-Analytic Review of Psychological Interventions

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Filip Smit;Cathrine Mihalopoulos

  • The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Erica Weitz;Erica Weitz;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Isaac M. Marks;Annemieke van Straten;Kate Cavanagh

  • Depression and body mass index, a u-shaped association

    Leonore M de Wit;Annemieke van Straten;Marieke van Herten;Brenda W J H Penninx

  • Adherence to Internet-Based and Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression: A Meta-Analysis

    Wouter van Ballegooijen;Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Eirini Karyotaki

  • Psychological treatment of depression: results of a series of meta-analyses.

    Pim Cuijpers;Gerhard Andersson;Tara Donker;Annemieke van Straten

  • Psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis.

    C. Acarturk;P. Cuijpers;A. van Straten;R. de Graaf

  • Psychotherapy for chronic major depression and dysthymia: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Josien Schuurmans;Patricia van Oppen

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Intervention for Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Annemieke van Straten;Pim Cuijpers;Niels Smits

  • Problem solving therapies for depression: A meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Lisanne Warmerdam

Frequent Co-Authors

Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jaap Lancee
Jaap Lancee University of Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof
Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eus J.W. Van Someren
Eus J.W. Van Someren Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The USA offers a wide range of online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities, catering to those seeking flexibility and career advancement. Accelerated programs have become especially popular, letting students complete credentials faster without sacrificing quality. For example, masters in social work accelerated programs provide a quicker route to leadership roles in social services, while the fastest online psychology degree paths are ideal for those eager to start a career in mental health, research, or counseling.

If you're interested in professional counseling, exploring cacrep online counseling programs can help you find affordable and accredited routes to licensure. Additionally, those drawn to family dynamics and therapy can pursue marriage and family masters programs online to gain the specialized expertise needed for supporting families and couples.

These accredited online degrees open doors to diverse career pathways—from counseling and social work to psychology and therapy—offering the flexibility needed to balance work, life, and education in today’s fast-paced world.

Best Scientists Citing Annemieke van Straten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles