World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3568 3290 178 171 274 12012

Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof between 1983 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof published across 39 years, from 1983 to 2021, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 13 of the 318 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications
1983 2021

318 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof: publications per year, 1983 to 2021
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 5
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 5
1994 1
1995 6
1996 4
1997 7
1998 4
1999 6
2000 13
2001 7
2002 7
2003 5
2004 16
2005 5
2006 18
2007 20
2008 11
2009 11
2010 18
2011 15
2012 12
2013 20
2014 18
2015 25
2016 21
2017 6
2018 7
2019 7
2020 8
2021 5
Total 318
Download as CSV

Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 274 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 274
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Psychiatry
  • Major depressive disorder

Psychiatry, Suicide prevention, Injury prevention, Clinical psychology and Suicidal ideation are his primary areas of study. Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof has researched Psychiatry in several fields, including Personality disorders, Prison, Convergent validity and Rating scale. Suicide prevention is often connected to Human factors and ergonomics in his work.

His work in the fields of Suicide attempt overlaps with other areas such as Occupational safety and health, Feeling, Gerontology and Public health. His studies deal with areas such as Social support and Comorbidity as well as Gerontology. His work is dedicated to discovering how Clinical psychology, Personality are connected with Developmental psychology and other disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992. Results of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study on Parasuicide (597 citations)
  • Definitions of suicidal behavior: lessons learned from the WHO/EURO multicentre Study (180 citations)
  • Why People Engage in Parasuicide: A Cross‐Cultural Study of Intentions (130 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Suicide prevention, Psychiatry, Injury prevention, Human factors and ergonomics and Clinical psychology. His work on Suicidal ideation and Suicide attempt as part of general Suicide prevention study is frequently connected to Occupational safety and health, Mental health and Medical emergency, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. Many of his research projects under Psychiatry are closely connected to Parasuicide with Parasuicide, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

His Injury prevention studies intersect with other disciplines such as Demography, Social psychology and Gerontology. Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof performs multidisciplinary study on Human factors and ergonomics and MEDLINE in his works. His research in Clinical psychology tackles topics such as Personality which are related to areas like Developmental psychology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Suicide prevention (60.71%)
  • Psychiatry (53.17%)
  • Injury prevention (34.92%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Suicide prevention (60.71%)
  • Psychiatry (53.17%)
  • Suicidal ideation (22.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Suicide prevention, Psychiatry, Suicidal ideation, Injury prevention and Clinical psychology. As part of his studies on Suicide prevention, he often connects relevant areas like Human factors and ergonomics. His Psychiatry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Psychotherapist and Patient satisfaction.

His study on Suicide rates is often connected to Young adult and Peer support as part of broader study in Injury prevention. His Clinical psychology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Psychological intervention, Affect and Moderation. The concepts of his Mental health study are interwoven with issues in Demography and Cognitive therapy.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Program for Suicidal Thinking in an Australian Community Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial (30 citations)
  • Relationship of suicide rates with climate and economic variables in Europe during 2000-2012 (29 citations)
  • Efficacy of adolescent suicide prevention e-learning modules for gatekeepers: a randomized controlled trial (22 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Psychiatry

His primary scientific interests are in Suicide prevention, Injury prevention, Suicidal ideation, Psychiatry and Intervention. Injury prevention and Human factors and ergonomics are frequently intertwined in his study. In general Human factors and ergonomics study, his work on Suicide rates often relates to the realm of Occupational safety and health, Unemployment and Austerity, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His Psychiatry study frequently links to related topics such as Sample. His work deals with themes such as Self-help and Family medicine, which intersect with Intervention. His work on History of depression as part of his general Depression study is frequently connected to Suicide attempt, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Best Publications

  • Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992. Results of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study on Parasuicide

    Armin Schmidtke;Unni Bille-Brahe;Diego DeLeo;Ad Kerkhof

  • Parasuicide in Europe: the WHO/EURO multicentre study on parasuicide. I. Introduction and preliminary analysis for 1989.

    S. Platt;U. Bille-Brahe;A. Kerkhof;A. Schmidtke

  • The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): Community-Based Validation Study of a New Scale for the Measurement of Suicidal Ideation

    Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear;Louise Farrer

  • Definitions of suicidal behavior: lessons learned from the WHO/EURO multicentre Study

    Diego De Leo;Shelley Leanne Burgis;Jose M. Bertolote;Ad Kerkhof

  • Attitudes and stigma in relation to help-seeking intentions for psychological problems in low and high suicide rate regions

    A. Reynders;A. J. F. M. Kerkhof;G. Molenberghs;C. Van Audenhove

  • Why People Engage in Parasuicide: A Cross-Cultural Study of Intentions

    Heidi Hjelmeland;Keith Hawton;Hilmar Nordvik;Unni Bille-Brahe

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of the community reinforcement approach in alcohol, cocaine and opioid addiction

    Hendrik G Roozen;Jiska J Boulogne;Maurits W van Tulder;Wim van den Brink

  • Preventing suicide in prisons, part I. Recommendations from the International Association for Suicide Prevention Task Force on Suicide in Prisons.

    Norbert Konrad;Marc S. Daigle;Anasseril E. Daniel;Greg E. Dear

  • Relation between attempted suicide and suicide rates among young people in Europe.

    Keith E. Hawton;Ella Arensman;Danuta Wasserman;A. Hultén

  • Mental disorders in European Prison Systems

    Eric Blaauw;Ronald Roesch;Ad Kerkhof

  • Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis

    Chani Nuij;Wouter van Ballegooijen;Derek de Beurs;Dilfa Juniar

  • Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ozlem Eylem;Ozlem Eylem;Leonore de Wit;Annemieke van Straten;Lena Steubl

  • The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression on suicidality and hopelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Derek P. de Beurs;Derek P. de Beurs;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Matthias Berking

  • Demographic, criminal and psychiatric factors related to inmate suicide

    Eric Blaauw;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof;Lindsay M. Hayes

  • Effectiveness of online self-help for suicidal thoughts: results of a randomised controlled trial.

    Bregje A. J. van Spijker;Annemieke van Straten;Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof

  • Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo's time perspective inventory in psychiatry

    Wessel van Beek;Han Berghuis;Ad Kerkhof;Aartjan Beekman

  • Relationship of suicide rates to economic variables in Europe: 2000-2011

    Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis;Wolfram Kawohl;Pavlos N. Theodorakis;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof

  • Personality and the onset of depression in late life.

    Bas Steunenberg;Bas Steunenberg;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Dorly J.H. Deeg;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof;Ad J.F.M. Kerkhof

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy to prevent complicated grief among relatives and spouses bereaved by suicide: cluster randomised controlled trial

    Marieke de Groot;Jos de Keijser;Jan Neeleman;Ad Kerkhof

  • Wishes to die in older people: a quantitative study of prevalence and associated factors

    M.L. Rurup;D.J.H. Deeg;D.J.H. Deeg;J.L. Poppelaars;J.L. Poppelaars;A.J.F.M. Kerkhof;A.J.F.M. Kerkhof

  • Stability and Change of Neuroticism in Aging

    Bas Steunenberg;Jos W. R. Twisk;Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Dorly J. H. Deeg

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of naltrexone in the maintenance treatment of opioid and alcohol dependence.

    Hendrik G. Roozen;Ranne de Waart;Danielle A.W.M. van der Windt;Wim van den Brink

  • Attempted suicide among immigrants in European countries: an international perspective

    Cendrine Bursztein Lipsicas;Ilkka Henrik Mäkinen;Alan Apter;Diego De Leo

Frequent Co-Authors

Diego De Leo
Diego De Leo Griffith University
Derek de Beurs
Derek de Beurs University of Amsterdam
Armin Schmidtke
Armin Schmidtke University of Würzburg
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Danuta Wasserman
Danuta Wasserman Karolinska Institute
Annemieke van Straten
Annemieke van Straten Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David Clark
David Clark University of Glasgow
Jouko Lönnqvist
Jouko Lönnqvist Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Dorly J. H. Deeg
Dorly J. H. Deeg University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, many of which can be pursued online. A particularly promising field is speech-language pathology, which blends psychology, communication science, and hands-on support for people with communication disorders. Requirements for becoming a speech-language pathologist vary by state, so it’s important to understand the local regulations before applying for programs or credentials.

For example, you can learn more about becoming a speech therapist in Arizona and the specific education and licensure requirements involved. If Arkansas is your chosen state, researching slp requirements in Arkansas will provide helpful details about program prerequisites, clinical practice hours, and exam processes.

Those interested in practicing in California can discover how to become a speech language pathologist in California, where regulations emphasize graduate-level education and supervised experience. Similarly, reviewing slp requirements in Colorado gives insight into pathways available for aspiring professionals in that state.

Consider these pathways and resources as you plan your educational journey and career in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles