World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

David Clark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Clark sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Clark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Clark sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

David Clark is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within chemistry, with notable work in inorganic chemistry, materials chemistry, history and philosophy of science, organic chemistry, and information systems and management. The emphasis on inorganic and materials chemistry is reflected in their publications and main topics of interest, which include radioactive element chemistry and processing, Twentieth Century scientific developments, lanthanide and transition metal complexes, organometallic complex synthesis and catalysis, research, science and academia, nuclear issues and defense, and nuclear materials and properties.

David Clark has coauthored work with several researchers including Joseph C. Martz, Franz J. Freibert, Cameron Goetgeluck, Oluwatosin Olojo, and Stephen P. Hilton. Collaboration with these frequent coauthors indicates interdisciplinary investigations combining aspects of chemistry and nuclear science.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on chemical and nuclear materials, as well as analytical techniques and scientific history:

  • The duality of electron localization and covalency in lanthanide and actinide metallocenes, 2020, Chemical Science
  • The Taming of Plutonium: Plutonium Metallurgy and the Manhattan Project, 2021, Nuclear Technology
  • Trace Impurities Identified as Forensic Signatures in CMX-5 Fuel Pellets Using X-ray Spectroscopic Techniques, 2022, Analytical Chemistry
  • The Taming of Plutonium: Pu Metallurgy and the Manhattan Project, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Using wastewater sampling to investigate community-level differences in antibacterial resistance in a major urban center, USA, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The venues in which Clark has published reflect a range of disciplines and research interests, including Chemical Science, Nuclear Technology, Analytical Chemistry, arXiv, and bioRxiv. This diversity illustrates a cross-disciplinary approach to scientific challenges.

Awards recognizing Clark's professional standing include being a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom and membership in the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. These affiliations highlight a recognized role in the broader scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder

    Jan Fawcett;William A. Scheftner;Louis Fogg;David C. Clark

  • The changing model of palliative care

    Fiona Graham;Fiona Graham;David Clark;David Clark

  • Clinical predictors of suicide in patients with major affective disorders: a controlled prospective study.

    Jan Fawcett;William Scheftner;David Clark;Don Hedeker

  • `Total pain', disciplinary power and the body in the work of Cicely Saunders, 1958–1967

    David Clark

  • Mapping Levels of Palliative Care Development: A Global View

    Michael Wright;Justin Wood;Thomas Lynch;David Clark

  • Assessing Anhedonia in Psychiatric Patients: The Pleasure Scale

    Jan Fawcett;David C. Clark;William A. Scheftner;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals.

    N. Ahmed;J. C. Bestall;Sam H. Ahmedzai;Sheila Payne

  • Special ArticleMapping Levels of Palliative Care Development: A Global Update

    Thomas Lynch;Stephen Connor;David Clark

  • Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life.

    Merryn Gott;Jane Seymour;Gary Bellamy;David Clark

  • From margins to centre: a review of the history of palliative care in cancer

    David Clark

  • Between hope and acceptance: the medicalisation of dying

    David Clark

  • Genomic organization of the human multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene and origin of P-glycoproteins.

    Chang-Jie Chen;D. Clark;K. Ueda;I. Pastan

  • Diagnosing depression in the hospitalized medically ill

    Stephanie Cavanaugh;David C. Clark;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide : a view from an EAPC ethics task force.

    Lars Johan Materstvedt;David Clark;John Ellershaw;Reidun Førde

  • Dopamine-receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity. I. Review of the evidence.

    D Clark;S Hjorth;A Carlsson

  • Vicissitudes of depressed mood during four years of medical school.

    David C. Clark;Peter B. Zeldow

  • Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure

    Robert D. Gibbons;David C. Clark;David J. Kupfer

  • Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers.

    Carol Thomas;S. M. Morris;D. Clark

  • EAPC Atlas of Palliative Care in Europe

    Carlos Centeno;David Clark;Thomas Lynch;Javier Rocafort

  • Mapping Levels of Palliative Care Development in 198 Countries: The Situation in 2017.

    David Clark;Nicole Baur;David Clelland;Eduardo Garralda

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian L. Scott
Brian L. Scott Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jan Fawcett
Jan Fawcett University of New Mexico
Stosh A. Kozimor
Stosh A. Kozimor Los Alamos National Laboratory
Robert D. Gibbons
Robert D. Gibbons University of Chicago
John C. Huffman
John C. Huffman Indiana University
Enrique R. Batista
Enrique R. Batista Los Alamos National Laboratory
Arvid Carlsson
Arvid Carlsson University of Gothenburg
Richard L. Martin
Richard L. Martin Los Alamos National Laboratory
Malcolm H. Chisholm
Malcolm H. Chisholm The Ohio State University
Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare beyond studying Medicine in the USA, online nursing programs offer flexible and affordable pathways. Increasingly, students are pursuing advanced roles through nurse practitioner programs that can be completed online, opening doors to rewarding clinical careers.

If you are already a registered nurse but want to advance your credentials, you can explore the cheapest rn to bsn online programs for cost-effective degree completion. These options help RNs gain professional growth and qualify for higher-paying positions while balancing work and study.

For those seeking leadership or academic roles, online phd programs nursing offer a flexible route to the highest credentials in the field. Research, teaching, and executive roles are all possible outcomes.

Curious about affordability? You can compare offerings and discover what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online to minimize your investment and maximize your career potential. Online nursing degrees provide a variety of career pathways that complement traditional medical study.

Best Scientists Citing David Clark

Trending Scientists