World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 56 11869 10693 3191 2609 244 9014

Enrique R. Batista publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enrique R. Batista between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enrique R. Batista published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 15 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enrique R. Batista: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 4
2005 5
2006 14
2007 6
2008 11
2009 10
2010 18
2011 26
2012 15
2013 24
2014 7
2015 17
2016 12
2017 11
2018 37
2019 42
2020 21
2021 47
2022 16
2023 19
2024 12
2025 14
2026 1
Total 397
Download as CSV

Enrique R. Batista publications per year - data summary

  • Enrique R. Batista, a Chemistry scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, has 397 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 47 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 2001, 2002 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 13.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.2 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 62 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 37 publications (3.7 per year); 2008-2017: 151 publications (15.1 per year); 2018-2026: 209 publications (23.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Enrique R. Batista publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrique R. Batista sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 244 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 244
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Enrique R. Batista publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 61–80 to 1,295+ publications.
  • Enrique R. Batista, a Chemistry scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 244 publications - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Enrique R. Batista, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 241–260 publications range, and Enrique R. Batista falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 161–180 publications, holding 1,350 scientists (8% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 361–380 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Enrique R. Batista D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrique R. Batista sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 56
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Enrique R. Batista D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 159+ D-Index.
  • Enrique R. Batista, a Chemistry scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 56 D-Index - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Enrique R. Batista, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 62–63 D-Index range, and Enrique R. Batista ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 56–57 D-Index, holding 1,051 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Enrique R. Batista is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within materials science and chemistry, focusing particularly on materials chemistry and inorganic chemistry.

Their scholarly output includes numerous publications in prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • JACS Au
  • Chemical Science

Batista's work covers a variety of main topics in the chemical and materials science domains. These include:

  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
  • Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Nuclear Materials and Properties

The scientist's recent publications reflect a focus on chemical sciences and materials chemistry. Selected recent papers include:

  • The duality of electron localization and covalency in lanthanide and actinide metallocenes, 2020, Chemical Science
  • Comparison of tetravalent cerium and terbium ions in a conserved, homoleptic imidophosphorane ligand field, 2020, Chemical Science
  • δ and φ back-donation in AnIV metallacycles, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Pairwise Difference Regression: A Machine Learning Meta-algorithm for Improved Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification in Chemical Search, 2021, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Isolation and characterization of a californium metallocene, 2021, Nature

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ping Yang
  • Andrew J. Gaunt
  • Conrad A. P. Goodwin
  • Thomas E. Albrecht-Schmitt
  • Ivan A. Popov

Their fields of study are primarily Materials Science and Chemistry. Within these, key subfields are:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Best Publications

  • Calculation of One-Electron Redox Potentials Revisited. Is It Possible to Calculate Accurate Potentials with Density Functional Methods?

    Lindsay E. Roy;Elena Jakubikova;M. Graham Guthrie;Enrique R. Batista

  • Determining Relative f and d Orbital Contributions to M–Cl Covalency in MCl62– (M = Ti, Zr, Hf, U) and UOCl5– Using Cl K-Edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    Stefan G. Minasian;Jason M. Keith;Enrique R. Batista;Kevin S. Boland

  • Synthesis of imido analogs of the uranyl ion.

    Trevor W. Hayton;James M. Boncella;Brian L. Scott;Phillip D. Palmer

  • Molecular multipole moments of water molecules in ice Ih

    Enrique R. Batista;Sotiris S. Xantheas;Hannes Jónsson

  • Covalency in lanthanides. An X-ray absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory study of LnCl6(x-) (x = 3, 2).

    Matthias W. Löble;Jason M. Keith;Jason M. Keith;Alison B. Altman;S. Chantal E. Stieber

  • Uranium azide photolysis results in C–H bond activation and provides evidence for a terminal uranium nitride

    Robert K. Thomson;Thibault Cantat;Brian L. Scott;David E. Morris

  • Trends in covalency for d- and f-element metallocene dichlorides identified using chlorine K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and time-dependent density functional theory.

    Stosh A Kozimor;Ping Yang;Enrique R Batista;Kevin S Boland

  • Energy-Degeneracy-Driven Covalency in Actinide Bonding

    Jing Su;Enrique R. Batista;Kevin S. Boland;Sharon E. Bone

  • New evidence for 5f covalency in actinocenes determined from carbon K-edge XAS and electronic structure theory

    Stefan G. Minasian;Stefan G. Minasian;Jason M. Keith;Enrique R. Batista;Kevin S. Boland

  • Comparison of screened hybrid density functional theory to diffusion Monte Carlo in calculations of total energies of silicon phases and defects

    Enrique R. Batista;Jochen Heyd;Richard G. Hennig;Blas P. Uberuaga

  • Cation-cation interactions, magnetic communication, and reactivity of the pentavalent uranium ion [U(NtBu)2]+.

    Liam P. Spencer;Eric J. Schelter;Ping Yang;Robyn L. Gdula

  • Synthesis and reactivity of the imido analogues of the uranyl ion.

    Trevor W. Hayton;James M. Boncella;Brian L. Scott;Enrique R. Batista

  • On the Origin of Covalent Bonding in Heavy Actinides

    Morgan P. Kelley;Jing Su;Matthew Urban;Morgan Luckey

  • Effect of spin-orbit coupling on the actinide dioxides AnO2 (An=Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, and Am): a screened hybrid density functional study.

    Xiao-Dong Wen;Richard L. Martin;Lindsay E. Roy;Gustavo E. Scuseria

  • Design, Isolation, and Spectroscopic Analysis of a Tetravalent Terbium Complex.

    Natalie T. Rice;Ivan A. Popov;Dominic R. Russo;John Bacsa

  • Electronic Structure and Spectroscopy of [Ru(tpy)2]2+, [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(H2O)]2+, and [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(Cl)]+

    Elena Jakubikova;Weizhong Chen;Dana M. Dattelbaum;Francisca N. Rein

  • Quantitative Evidence for Lanthanide-Oxygen Orbital Mixing in CeO2, PrO2, and TbO2.

    Stefan G. Minasian;Enrique R. Batista;Corwin H. Booth;David L. Clark

  • Localization of Electronic Excitations in Conjugated Polymers Studied by DFT

    Iffat H. Nayyar;Iffat H. Nayyar;Enrique R. Batista;Enrique R. Batista;Sergei Tretiak;Sergei Tretiak;Avadh Saxena;Avadh Saxena

  • Multipole moments of water molecules in clusters and ice Ih from first principles calculations

    Enrique R. Batista;Sotiris S. Xantheas;Hannes Jónsson

  • Covalency in Americium(III) Hexachloride

    Justin N. Cross;Jing Su;Enrique R. Batista;Samantha K. Cary

  • Density functional investigations of the properties and thermochemistry of UF6 and UF5 using valence-electron and all-electron approaches

    Enrique R. Batista;Richard L. Martin;P. Jeffrey Hay;Juan E. Peralta

  • On the excited states involved in the luminescent probe [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+.

    Enrique R. Batista;Richard L. Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Stosh A. Kozimor
Stosh A. Kozimor Los Alamos National Laboratory
Richard L. Martin
Richard L. Martin Los Alamos National Laboratory
Brian L. Scott
Brian L. Scott Los Alamos National Laboratory
David Clark
David Clark University of Glasgow
James M. Boncella
James M. Boncella Los Alamos National Laboratory
Hannes Jónsson
Hannes Jónsson University of Iceland
David K. Shuh
David K. Shuh Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Gustavo E. Scuseria
Gustavo E. Scuseria Rice University
Sergei Tretiak
Sergei Tretiak Los Alamos National Laboratory
Xiaodong Wen
Xiaodong Wen Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can complement your studies and expand your career options. For instance, some students may find combining their science background with fields like criminal justice beneficial, with programs detailing criminal justice degree cost being a key factor in choosing the right path.

There are flexible options such as a 2 year criminal justice degree online, which offers a quicker route into the workforce while still building essential analytical skills that complement science disciplines.

Additionally, careers in legal support can be pursued through a paralegal studies associate degree, which provides a practical, career-focused education. This can diversify a graduate’s skill set, especially in regulatory and compliance roles linked to Chemistry.

For those interested in blending science knowledge with business, opportunities such as pharmaceutical sales offer attractive prospects. Understanding how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make can help guide decisions about entering this rewarding career path within the pharmaceutical industry.

Best Scientists Citing Enrique R. Batista

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles