World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
9626
World Ranking
7451
National Ranking
4027

Thomas G. Plante publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Plante sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 265 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas G. Plante D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Plante sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas G. Plante is affiliated with Santa Clara University in the United States and has a research focus spanning social sciences and psychology. Their work is concentrated primarily in areas related to health, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

The scholar's research topics prominently include religion, spirituality, and psychology, with additional emphasis on mindfulness and compassion interventions. Other key interests cover health and well-being studies, grief, bereavement, mental health treatment and access, optimism and hope, as well as death anxiety and social exclusion.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include Spirituality in Clinical Practice, Pastoral Psychology, Religions, Integratus, and Current Psychology. These journals reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their work, integrating spiritual and psychological perspectives.

Collaboration is evident through regular co-authorship with several colleagues, such as Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Lindsey W. Vilca, Carlos Carbajal-León, Mario Reyes-Bossio, and Anthony Isacco. These partnerships highlight a network of researchers engaged in similar domains.

Recent publications by Thomas G. Plante include:

  • Clericalism Contributes to Religious, Spiritual, and Behavioral Struggles among Catholic Priests, 2020, Religions
  • Human interaction with the divine, the sacred, and the deceased: topics that warrant increased attention by psychologists, 2023, Current Psychology
  • A Review of Spiritual Development and Transformation among College Students from Jesuit Higher Education, 2020, Religions

The majority of Thomas G. Plante's work addresses intersections of spirituality with psychological and clinical practice frameworks, often investigating belief systems, faith, and their implications for mental health and well-being.

Best Publications

  • Cultivating mindfulness: effects on well-being.

    Shauna L. Shapiro;Doug Oman;Carl E. Thoresen;Thomas G. Plante

  • The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Thomas G. Plante;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Meditation Lowers Stress and Supports Forgiveness Among College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Doug Oman;Shauna L Shapiro;Carl E Thoresen;Thomas G Plante

  • The moderation of mindfulness-based stress reduction effects by trait mindfulness: Results from a randomized controlled trial

    Shauna L. Shapiro;Kirk Warren Brown;Carl Thoresen;Thomas G. Plante

  • Physical fitness and enhanced psychological health

    Thomas G. Plante;Judith Rodin

  • Religious faith and spirituality in substance abuse recovery: determining the mental health benefits.

    Dustin A Pardini;Thomas G Plante;Allen Sherman;Jamie E Stump

  • The Development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An Abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s Compassionate Love Scale

    Jeong Yeong Hwang;Thomas G. Plante;Kathleen Lackey

  • Faith and Health: Psychological Perspectives

    Thomas G. Plante;Allen C. Sherman

  • Spiritual practices in psychotherapy: Thirteen tools for enhancing psychological health.

    Thomas G. Plante

  • The Development of a Brief Version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Charlotte L. Vallaeys;Allen C. Sherman;Kenneth A. Wallston

  • Reliability and validity of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Thomas G. Plante;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Integrating spirituality and psychotherapy: ethical issues and principles to consider.

    Thomas G. Plante

  • Prospective study of religious coping among patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

    Allen C. Sherman;Thomas G. Plante;Stephanie Simonton;Umaira Latif

  • Contemporary Clinical Psychology

    Thomas G. Plante

  • Psychological benefits of exercise paired with virtual reality: Outdoor exercise energizes whereas indoor virtual exercise relaxes.

    Thomas G. Plante;Cara Cage;Sara Clements;Allison Stover

  • Might virtual reality promote the mood benefits of exercise

    Thomas G Plante;Thomas G Plante;Arianne Aldridge;Ryan Bogden;Cara Hanelin

  • Changes in Quality-of-Life and Psychosocial Adjustment among Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

    Allen C. Sherman;Stephanie Simonton;Umaira Latif;Thomas G. Plante

  • Measuring religious faith in cancer patients: reliability and construct validity of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith questionnaire.

    Allen C. Sherman;Stephanie Simonton;Dawn C. Adams;Umaira Latif

  • Religious faith and mental health outcomes

    Thomas G. Plante;Naveen K. Sharma

  • Further Validation for the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Thomas G. Plante;Scott Yancey;Allen Sherman;Mira Guertin

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl E. Thoresen
Carl E. Thoresen Stanford University
Marcus T. Boccaccini
Marcus T. Boccaccini Sam Houston State University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Ralph W. Hood
Ralph W. Hood University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Shauna L. Shapiro
Shauna L. Shapiro Santa Clara University
Ryan Bogdan
Ryan Bogdan Washington University in St. Louis
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Judith Rodin
Judith Rodin Rockefeller Foundation
Dustin A. Pardini
Dustin A. Pardini Arizona State University
Elias Anaissie
Elias Anaissie University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in psychology, it’s important to explore a variety of online degree and career pathway options. The flexibility of online programs allows students to balance their studies with other commitments, while advancing toward specialties like clinical psychology, counseling, or research.

Cost is a major factor for many students. For those seeking an affordable education, reviewing affordable psychology degrees in Vermont can offer insight into cost-effective options without compromising quality.

It’s also helpful to look into regional program strengths. Students interested in vibrant student communities and diverse learning environments should consider the most popular psychology degree programs in Charlotte, as well as the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C.. These urban centers offer unique networking and internship opportunities.

For personalized learning experiences and smaller program sizes, you might explore popular psychology programs in Delaware. Exploring these different pathways can help you find a program that matches your career goals and personal needs.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas G. Plante

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles