World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Linda E. Carlson

Linda E. Carlson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1204 1058 59 49 234 51425

Linda E. Carlson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda E. Carlson between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda E. Carlson published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2013. 34 of the 306 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2013. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 12 publications
1998 2025

306 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda E. Carlson: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 7
2001 5
2002 3
2003 4
2004 7
2005 12
2006 8
2007 9
2008 9
2009 18
2010 11
2011 6
2012 11
2013 24
2014 9
2015 16
2016 8
2017 14
2018 11
2019 9
2020 12
2021 23
2022 16
2023 17
2024 22
2025 12
Total 306
Download as CSV

Linda E. Carlson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda E. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 234 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 234
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda E. Carlson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda E. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda E. Carlson is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research spans the intersection of medicine and psychology, with a particular emphasis on oncology and clinical psychology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Integrative Oncology Care of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Cancer: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Patient and family financial burden associated with cancer treatment in Canada: a national study, 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Potentially Modifiable Factors Associated with Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review, 2020, Cancers
  • The Quality of Life and Psychosocial Implications of Cancer-Related Lower-Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Health Care Provider Preferences for, and Barriers to, Cannabis Use in Cancer Care, 2020, Current Oncology

The scientist has contributed to book publications, including:

  • The art & science of mindfulness: Integrating mindfulness into the helping professions (3rd ed.), published by the American Psychological Association in 2024

Their main fields of study encompass:

  • Medicine (140 publications)
  • Psychology (52 publications)

Subfields of study associated with their work include:

  • Oncology (45 publications)
  • Clinical Psychology (40 publications)
  • Complementary and alternative medicine (27 publications)
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (20 publications)
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (14 publications)

The main research topics covered are:

  • Cancer survivorship and care (78 publications)
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (44 publications)
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (40 publications)
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (28 publications)
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (20 publications)
  • Family Support in Illness (18 publications)
  • Child Therapy and Development (14 publications)

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Devesh Oberoi (20 publications)
  • Mohamad Baydoun (18 publications)
  • Katherine-Ann Piedalue (17 publications)
  • Julie M. Deleemans (12 publications)
  • Shauna L. Shapiro (12 publications)

Common publication venues for their research are:

  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (6 publications)
  • Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice (6 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (5 publications)
  • Current Oncology (5 publications)
  • JMIR Research Protocols (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Mindfulness : A proposed operational definition

    Scott R. Bishop;Mark Lau;Shauna Shapiro;Linda E Carlson

  • Mechanisms of mindfulness.

    Shauna L. Shapiro;Linda E. Carlson;John A. Astin;Benedict Freedman

  • The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation

    Mark A. Lau;Scott R. Bishop;Zindel V. Segal;Tom Buis

  • A randomized, wait-list controlled clinical trial: the effect of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients.

    Michael Speca;Linda E. Carlson;Eileen Goodey;Maureen Angen

  • Mindfulness-based stress reduction in relation to quality of life, mood, symptoms of stress, and immune parameters in breast and prostate cancer outpatients.

    Linda E. Carlson;Michael Speca;Kamala D. Patel;Eileen Goodey

  • High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients

    L E Carlson;M Angen;M Angen;J Cullum;E Goodey

  • Mindfulness-based stress reduction in relation to quality of life, mood, symptoms of stress and levels of cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and melatonin in breast and prostate cancer outpatients.

    Linda E Carlson;Michael Speca;Michael Speca;Kamala D Patel;Eileen Goodey

  • Exploring self‐compassion and empathy in the context of mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR)

    Kathryn Birnie;Michael Speca;Michael Speca;Linda E. Carlson;Linda E. Carlson

  • One year pre–post intervention follow-up of psychological, immune, endocrine and blood pressure outcomes of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in breast and prostate cancer outpatients

    Linda E. Carlson;Michael Speca;Michael Speca;Peter Faris;Kamala D. Patel

  • Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population.

    Linda E. Carlson;Kirk Warren Brown

  • Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on sleep, mood, stress and fatigue symptoms in cancer outpatients

    Linda E. Carlson;Sheila N. Garland

  • Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment.

    Heather Greenlee;Melissa J. DuPont-Reyes;Lynda G. Balneaves;Linda E. Carlson

  • Screening for Distress and Unmet Needs in Patients With Cancer: Review and Recommendations

    Linda E. Carlson;Amy Waller;Alex J. Mitchell

  • The effects of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients: 6-month follow-up

    Linda E. Carlson;Zenovia Ursuliak;Eileen Goodey;Maureen Angen

  • Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods.

    Linda E Carlson;Linda E Carlson;Barry D Bultz;Barry D Bultz

  • Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign--future directions in cancer care.

    Barry D. Bultz;Barry D. Bultz;Linda E. Carlson

  • A pilot study of yoga for breast cancer survivors: physical and psychological benefits

    S. Nicole Culos-Reed;Linda E. Carlson;Linda E. Carlson;Lisa M. Daroux;Susi Hately-Aldous

  • Efficacy and medical cost offset of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: making the case for economic analyses.

    Linda E. Carlson;Barry D. Bultz;Barry D. Bultz

  • Screening for Distress in Lung and Breast Cancer Outpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Linda E. Carlson;Shannon L. Groff;Olga Maciejewski;Barry D. Bultz

  • A non-randomized comparison of mindfulness-based stress reduction and healing arts programs for facilitating post-traumatic growth and spirituality in cancer outpatients

    Sheila N. Garland;Linda E. Carlson;Sarah Cook;Laura Lansdell

  • Short Communication Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population

    Linda E. Carlson;Kirk Warren Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry D. Bultz
Barry D. Bultz University of Calgary
Michael Speca
Michael Speca University of Calgary
Shauna L. Shapiro
Shauna L. Shapiro Santa Clara University
Janine Giese-Davis
Janine Giese-Davis University of Calgary
Josée Savard
Josée Savard Université Laval
Barbara B. Sherwin
Barbara B. Sherwin McGill University
Alex J. Mitchell
Alex J. Mitchell University of Leicester
Paul Grossman
Paul Grossman University Hospital of Basel
Zindel V. Segal
Zindel V. Segal University of Toronto
Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Sonia Ancoli-Israel University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of career paths and specialized certifications. Online programs now make it easier than ever to advance your expertise or change your direction in areas like clinical psychology, counseling, or behavioral analysis.

One increasingly popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). If you're considering this career, it’s essential to understand the distinct state and city-specific requirements that shape your journey. For example, the Gilbert bcba education requirements detail coursework and experience necessary for practice in that city. Likewise, the Glendale bcba education requirements highlight important differences students might encounter.

Further, students should review the Greensboro bcba education requirements as well as the Henderson bcba education requirements to compare prerequisites and professional expectations across various regions.

Researching programs and ensuring they meet local criteria is crucial to a successful career in psychology or behavior analysis, especially when pursuing online degrees tailored to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Linda E. Carlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles