World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
14294
World Ranking
4002
National Ranking
428

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14522
World Ranking
4299
National Ranking
377

Andrew R. Mayes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Mayes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew R. Mayes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Mayes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew R. Mayes is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a notable emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. They have contributed to a range of subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, and pharmaceutical science.

The scientist's work centers on several main topics, particularly memory and neural mechanisms and memory processes and influences. Other significant themes in their research include neuroscience and neuropharmacology, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, advanced data storage technologies, and parallel computing and optimization techniques.

Recent publications by Andrew R. Mayes span from 2020 to 2024, reflecting ongoing involvement in various aspects of memory and neurocognitive research. These include:

  • "Thalamic-Medial Temporal Lobe Connectivity Underpins Familiarity Memory," 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Can pupillometry distinguish accurate from inaccurate familiarity?", 2021, Psychophysiology
  • "Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming," 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • "33261 Topically applied skin natural fatty acids and 12-hydroxystearic acid boosts barrier lipids," 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • "The hippocampus supports the representation of abstract concepts: Implications for the study of recognition memory," 2024, Neuropsychologia

Andrew R. Mayes has collaborated frequently with several researchers in the field. Their most common coauthors are:

  • Daniela Montaldi
  • Alex Kafkas
  • Ken A. Paller
  • Carlos Alexandre Gomes
  • James W. Antony

Their research has been published in diverse venues reflective of their interdisciplinary approach. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Psychophysiology
  • Memory & Cognition

Best Publications

  • Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes

    Andrew Mayes;Daniela Montaldi;Ellen Migo

  • Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

    Ken A. Paller;Marta Kutas;Andrew R. Mayes

  • Convergent neuroanatomical and behavioural evidence of an amygdala hypothesis of autism.

    Matthew Howard;P E Cowell;J Boucher;P Broks

  • Face processing impairments after encephalitis: amygdala damage and recognition of fear.

    Paul Broks;Paul Broks;Andrew W. Young;Elizabeth J. Maratos;Peter J. Coffey

  • Voxel-based morphometry reveals increased gray matter density in Broca's area in male symphony orchestra musicians

    Vanessa Sluming;Thomas R. Barrick;Matthew Howard;Matthew Howard;Enis Cezayirli

  • The neural system that mediates familiarity memory.

    Daniela Montaldi;Tom J. Spencer;Neil Roberts;Andrew R. Mayes

  • Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans

    JS Holdstock;AR Mayes;Neil Roberts;E Cezayirli

  • Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology

    John Patrick Aggleton;Seralynne Denise Vann;Christine Denby;Sophie Dix

  • A disproportionate role for the fornix and mammillary bodies in recall versus recognition memory

    Dimitris Tsivilis;Seralynne Denise Vann;Christine Denby;Neil Roberts

  • Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus.

    AR Mayes;JS Holdstock;CL Isaac;NM Hunkin

  • The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes.

    Daniela Montaldi;Andrew R. Mayes

  • A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage

    JS Holdstock;AR Mayes;E Cezayirli;CL Isaac

  • Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition.

    Andrew R. Mayes;J. S. Holdstock;C. L. Isaac;D. Montaldi

  • Location of Lesions in Korsakoff's Syndrome: Neuropsychological and Neuropathological Data on Two Patients

    Andrew R. Mayes;Peter R. Meudell;David Mann;Alan Pickering

  • Is Organic Amnesia Caused by a Selective Deficit in Remembering Contextual Information

    AR Mayes;PR Meudell;Alan Pickering

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphism Val66Met influences cognitive abilities in the elderly

    F. Miyajima;W. Ollier;A. Mayes;A. Jackson

  • Memory in autistic spectrum disorder.

    Jill Boucher;Andrew Mayes;Sally Bigham

  • Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods

    Seralynne Denise Vann;Dimitris Tsivilis;Christine E. Denby;Joel R. Quamme

  • When memory does not fail: familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Carmen E. Westerberg;Ken A. Paller;Sandra Weintraub;M.-Marsel Mesulam

  • Item Recognition Is Less Impaired Than Recall and Associative Recognition in a Patient With Selective Hippocampal Damage.

    JS Holdstock;AR Mayes;QY Gong;Neil Roberts

  • Human Organic Memory Disorders

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniela Montaldi
Daniela Montaldi University of Manchester
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts University of Edinburgh
Thomas J. Spencer
Thomas J. Spencer Massachusetts General Hospital
Qiyong Gong
Qiyong Gong Sichuan University
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Ken A. Paller
Ken A. Paller Northwestern University
Alan Pickering
Alan Pickering Goldsmiths University of London
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Michael D. Kopelman
Michael D. Kopelman King's College London
Jill Boucher
Jill Boucher City, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in psychology, exploring related fields and online degrees can expand your career options. Many students interested in helping others also look into social work, counseling, or human services programs. Online degree options provide maximum flexibility, allowing you to balance your studies with work or family commitments.

Cost is a major factor when selecting a degree. Fortunately, there are many affordable pathways available. For example, you can learn about the cheapest social work degrees in Atlanta, or explore affordable social work degrees in Arizona. Students aiming to study in New England can check out the most affordable social work degree programs in Boston. Similarly, those on the West Coast can investigate the cheapest social work programs in California.

These alternatives can prepare you for meaningful roles in mental health services, community outreach, or clinical settings, with clear pathways toward licensure and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew R. Mayes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles