World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2392 2184 263 247 251 15629

Michael D. Kopelman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael D. Kopelman between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael D. Kopelman published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2009. 9 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2009. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications
1973 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael D. Kopelman: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 5
1986 7
1987 5
1988 3
1989 5
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 0
1994 10
1995 2
1996 3
1997 4
1998 12
1999 7
2000 11
2001 9
2002 12
2003 12
2004 3
2005 7
2006 4
2007 5
2008 9
2009 14
2010 12
2011 4
2012 12
2013 5
2014 6
2015 10
2016 13
2017 13
2018 6
2019 10
2020 7
2021 4
2022 6
2023 6
2024 7
2025 2
Total 289
Download as CSV

Michael D. Kopelman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Kopelman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 251
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael D. Kopelman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Kopelman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Michael D. Kopelman is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions predominantly span the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a considerable focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield, alongside Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment

Michael D. Kopelman has published in several venues frequently, with the most common being:

  • Cortex
  • Medicine Science and the Law
  • Journal of the British Academy
  • Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
  • Respiratory Medicine

Recent papers featuring Michael D. Kopelman include:

  • What is the Korsakoff syndrome? - a paper in tribute to Prof Alwyn Lishman (2022), published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
  • Autobiographical memory loss in Alzheimer's disease: The role of the reminiscence bump (2022), published in Cortex
  • Long-term cognitive and psychiatric outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome managed with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (2021), published in Respiratory Medicine
  • A prospective study of the cognitive and psychiatric effects of pituitary tumours and their treatments (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
  • Accelerated forgetting in temporal lobe epilepsy: When does it occur? (2021), published in Cortex

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated multiple times with Michael D. Kopelman include:

  • Laura Marsh
  • Alan Baddeley
  • Chris R. Brewin
  • Graham Davies
  • Hector MacQueen

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom. This award does not have a specified year documented.

Best Publications

  • The autobiographical memory interview: a new assessment of autobiographical and personal semantic memory in amnesic patients.

    Michael D. Kopelman;B. A. Wilson;Alan D. Baddeley

  • Disorders of memory

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • The Korsakoff syndrome: clinical aspects, psychology and treatment.

    Michael D. Kopelman;Allan D. Thomson;Irene Guerrini;E. Jane Marshall

  • Remote and autobiographical memory, temporal context memory and frontal atrophy in Korsakoff and Alzheimer patients

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • The Korsakoff syndrome

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • The handbook of memory disorders

    Alan D. Baddeley;Michael D. Kopelman;Barbara A. Wilson

  • Rates of forgetting in Alzheimer-type dementia and Korsakoff's syndrome

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • Cholinergic 'blockade' as a model for cholinergic depletion. A comparison of the memory deficits with those of Alzheimer-type dementia and the alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome.

    Michael Kopelman;T. H. Corn

  • Two types of confabulation.

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • The National Adult Reading Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: a comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables.

    Peter Bright;Eli Jaldow;Michael D. Kopelman

  • The memory deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia: a review.

    Robin G. Morris;Michael D. Kopelman

  • Spared numerical abilities in a case of semantic dementia.

    Marinella Cappelletti;Brian Butterworth;Michael Kopelman;Michael Kopelman

  • FRONTAL DYSFUNCTION AND MEMORY DEFICITS IN THE ALCOHOLIC KORSAKOFF SYNDROME AND ALZHEIMER-TYPE DEMENTIA

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • Retrograde amnesia in patients with diencephalic, temporal lobe or frontal lesions.

    Michael D Kopelman;Nicola Stanhope;Derek Kingsley

  • The cholinergic neurotransmitter system in human memory and dementia: a review.

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • Temporal and spatial context memory in patients with focal frontal, temporal lobe, and diencephalic lesions

    Michael D Kopelman;Nicola Stanhope;Derek Kingsley

  • PATIENT INFORMATION RECALL IN A RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC

    J L Anderson;Sally Dodman;Michael Kopelman;A Fleming

  • Focal retrograde amnesia and the attribution of causality : An exceptionally critical review

    Michael D. Kopelman

  • FDG-PET Findings in the Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome

    Laurence J. Reed;Dan Lasserson;Paul K. Marsden;Nicola Stanhope

  • Amnesia: organic and psychogenic.

    Michael D Kopelman

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Linda Clare
Linda Clare University of Exeter
Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Aikaterini Fotopoulou University College London
Brian Butterworth
Brian Butterworth University College London
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Catherine Quinn
Catherine Quinn University of Bradford
Sharon M. Nelis
Sharon M. Nelis University of Exeter
Barbara A. Wilson
Barbara A. Wilson St George's, University of London
Narinder Kapur
Narinder Kapur University College London
Jennifer Rusted
Jennifer Rusted University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse online programs and specialized career trajectories. One rapidly growing field is applied behavior analysis, which often requires specific certifications for career advancement. Students interested in becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA) can pursue a mix of online coursework and supervised experience. Each state—and often each city—can have unique requirements to practice.

If you are planning to work in Wisconsin, review the bcba certification requirements in Milwaukee for detailed local guidance. Those interested in working in Minnesota can find tailored advice on how to become a bcba in Minneapolis. The path may differ slightly for those focusing on other states; for example, check Nashville's specific guidelines in the Nashville bcba requirements, or review credentials needed for New Orleans through New Orleans bcba requirements.

Exploring these resources can help you understand education options, credentialing processes, and local regulations, ensuring a smooth journey into a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Kopelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles