World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
8369
World Ranking
7589
National Ranking
446

Stefan Köhler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Köhler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefan Köhler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Köhler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Köhler is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and memory mechanisms. Their work spans several subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, developmental and educational psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and biophysics.

The research topics Köhler has worked on cover a range of areas within neuroscience and cognitive science. These include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Köhler has published research in multiple notable scientific venues, reflecting a diverse scope of contributions. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Journal of Vision
  • Cognition
  • eLife

Among recent contributions, several papers stand out for their focus on hippocampal structure and memory processes:

  • "Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold," published in 2022 in eLife
  • "Surface-based hippocampal subfield segmentation," published in 2021 in Trends in Neurosciences
  • "Examining the engram encoding specificity hypothesis in mice," published in 2023 in Neuron
  • "Familiarity impairments after anterior temporal-lobe resection with hippocampal sparing: Lessons learned from case NB," published in 2020 in Neuropsychologia
  • "Feeling-of-knowing experiences breed curiosity," published in 2021 in Memory

Köhler frequently collaborates with a select group of coauthors, which include:

  • Jordan DeKraker
  • Ali R. Khan
  • Haopei Yang
  • Bradley Karat
  • Paul W. Frankland

Their work has concentrated mainly on dissecting the neural basis of memory, including studies on hippocampal morphology, subfield segmentation, and mechanisms underlying familiarity and recognition. This research often involves advanced imaging techniques aligned with their expertise in radiology and cellular neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Finding the engram.

    Sheena A. Josselyn;Stefan Köhler;Paul W. Frankland

  • Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification

    Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Michael Kessler;Jan Barkmann;Merijn M. Bos

  • The case of K.C.: contributions of a memory-impaired person to memory theory

    R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Stefan Köhler;Daniel L. Schacter;Morris Moscovitch

  • Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus

    Ben Bowles;Carina Crupi;Seyed M. Mirsattari;Susan E. Pigott

  • Remote spatial memory in an amnesic person with extensive bilateral hippocampal lesions.

    R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Sandra Priselac;Stefan Köhler;Sandra E. Black

  • Volumetry of Temporopolar, Perirhinal, Entorhinal and Parahippocampal Cortex from High-resolution MR Images: Considering the Variability of the Collateral Sulcus

    Jens C. Pruessner;Stefan Köhler;Joelle Crane;Marita Pruessner

  • Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Forgetting

    Paul W. Frankland;Stefan Köhler;Sheena A. Josselyn

  • Distinct neural correlates of visual long-term memory for spatial location and object identity: a positron emission tomography study in humans.

    C Moscovitch;S Kapur;S Köhler;S Houle

  • Memory impairments associated with hippocampal versus parahippocampal-gyrus atrophy: an MR volumetry study in Alzheimer's disease.

    Stefan Köhler;Stefan Köhler;S. E. Black;S. E. Black;M. Sinden;C. Szekely

  • Neurogenesis-mediated forgetting minimizes proactive interference.

    Jonathan R. Epp;Rudy Silva Mera;Stefan Köhler;Sheena A. Josselyn

  • The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval

    Paul W. Frankland;Sheena A. Josselyn;Stefan Köhler

  • Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: a comparison based on event-related fMRI.

    Stefan Köhler;Stacey Danckert;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon

  • Effects of Left Inferior Prefrontal Stimulation on Episodic Memory Formation: A Two-Stage fMRI–rTMS Study

    Stefan Köhler;Tomáš Paus;Randy L. Buckner;Brenda Milner

  • Retrieval of autobiographical memory in Alzheimer's disease: Relation to volumes of medial temporal lobe and other structures

    Asaf Gilboa;Joel Ramirez;Stefan Köhler;Robyn Westmacott

  • Revisiting the novelty effect: When familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory

    J. Poppenk;S. Köhler;M. Moscovitch

  • Dissociation of pathways for object and spatial vision: a PET study in humans.

    Stefan Köhler;Shitij Kapur;Morris Moscovitch;Gordon Winocur

  • Double dissociation of selective recollection and familiarity impairments following two different surgical treatments for temporal-lobe epilepsy.

    Ben Bowles;Carina Crupi;Susan Pigott;Andrew Parrent

  • Differential contributions of the parahippocampal place area and the anterior hippocampus to human memory for scenes.

    Stefan Köhler;Joelle Crane;Brenda Milner

  • Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity

    Stefan Köhler;Morris Moscovitch;Gordon Winocur;Gordon Winocur;Sylvain Houle

  • Heroes of the Engram.

    Sheena A. Josselyn;Stefan Köhler;Paul W. Frankland

Frequent Co-Authors

Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Gordon Winocur
Gordon Winocur University of Toronto
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
R. Shayna Rosenbaum
R. Shayna Rosenbaum York University
Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Ken McRae
Ken McRae University of Western Ontario
Asaf Gilboa
Asaf Gilboa University of Toronto
Sheena A. Josselyn
Sheena A. Josselyn University of Toronto
Anthony R. McIntosh
Anthony R. McIntosh Simon Fraser University
Jens C. Pruessner
Jens C. Pruessner University of Konstanz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Köhler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles