World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
6517
World Ranking
4213
National Ranking
714

Ruth McDonald publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth McDonald sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ruth McDonald D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth McDonald sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth McDonald is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Health Professions, with significant contributions to the subfields of General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Education, Economics and Econometrics, and Strategy and Management.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare innovation and challenges
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Public-Private Partnership Projects
  • Public Procurement and Policy

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships," 2021, Journal of Social Policy
  • "Impact of changing provider remuneration on NHS general dental practitioner services in Northern Ireland: a mixed-methods study," 2020, Health Services and Delivery Research
  • "Assembling the Healthopolis: Competitive city-regionalism and policy boosterism pushing Greater Manchester further, faster," 2020, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
  • "Does health and social care provision for the community dwelling older population help to reduce unplanned secondary care, support timely discharge and improve patient well-being? A mixed method meta-review of systematic reviews," 2020, F1000Research
  • "Spillover effects of financial incentives for providers onto non-targeted patients: daycase surgery in English hospitals," 2023, Health Economics Policy and Law

Ruth McDonald has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Jonathan Hammond, Simon Bailey, Kath Checkland, Philip Britteon, and Søren Rud Kristensen.

Their publications have appeared in journals such as:

  • Health Services and Delivery Research
  • Journal of Social Policy
  • Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
  • F1000Research
  • Health Economics Policy and Law

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications as well, including a study titled "A study of the changes in Ojibwa, Tlinget, and Hopi basketry as relating to economic, political, societal, and historical changes in the respective societies," published by Michigan State University Libraries in 2024.

Best Publications

  • What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities

    Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi;Arne Risa Hole;Nicola Mead;Ruth McDonald

  • Reduced Mortality With Hospital Pay for Performance in England

    Matt Sutton;Silviya Nikolova;Ruth Boaden;Helen Lester

  • Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study.

    Ruth McDonald;Stephen Harrison;Kath Checkland;Stephen M Campbell

  • Pay for Performance in Primary Care in England and California: Comparison of Unintended Consequences

    Ruth McDonald;Martin Roland

  • The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.

    Stephen M. Campbell;Ruth McDonald;Helen Lester

  • What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications

    Marianna Fotaki;Martin Roland;Alan Boyd;Ruth McDonald

  • Rules and guidelines in clinical practice: a qualitative study in operating theatres of doctors’ and nurses’ views

    R McDonald;J Waring;S Harrison;K Walshe

  • Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract.

    Kath Checkland;Stephen Harrison;Ruth McDonald;Suzanne Grant

  • Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health

    Rosalind Raine;Ray Fitzpatrick;Helen Barratt;Gywn Bevan

  • Shifting care from hospitals to the community: a review of the evidence on quality and efficiency

    Bonnie Sibbald;Ruth McDonald;Martin Roland

  • Rules, safety and the narrativisation of identity: a hospital operating theatre case study

    Ruth McDonald;Justin Waring;Stephen Harrison

  • Long-Term Effect of Hospital Pay for Performance on Mortality in England

    Soren Rud Kristensen;Rachel Meacock;Alexander Turner;Ruth Boaden

  • Institutional complexity and individual responses : delineating the boundaries of partial autonomy

    Graham P. Martin;Graeme Currie;Simon Weaver;Rachael Finn

  • The Politics of Healthcare in Britain

    SR Harrison;Ruth Mcdonald;Er. McDonald

  • Innovation sustainability in challenging health-care contexts: embedding clinically led change in routine practice.

    Graham P Martin;Simon Weaver;Graeme Currie;Rachael Finn

  • Professional status in a changing world: The case of medicines use reviews in English community pharmacy.

    Ruth McDonald;Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi;Caroline Sanders;Darren Ashcroft

  • Patient Choice and the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Scoping Review

    M. Fotaki;A. Boyd;R. McDonald;L. Smith

  • What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual 'map' of patient preferences.

    Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi;Peter Bower;Nichola Mead;Ruth McDonald

  • Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behaviour changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992–2009

    Martin Tickle;Ruth McDonald;Jarrod Franklin;Vishal R. Aggarwal

  • Governing the ethical consumer: identity, choice and the primary care medical encounter

    Ruth McDonald;Nicola Mead;Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi;Peter Bower

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Roland
Martin Roland University of Cambridge
Matt Sutton
Matt Sutton University of Manchester
Stephen Birch
Stephen Birch University of Queensland
Stephen Harrison
Stephen Harrison University of Manchester
Ruth Boaden
Ruth Boaden University of Manchester
Stephen Campbell
Stephen Campbell University of Manchester
Birgit Völlm
Birgit Völlm University of Rostock
Justin Waring
Justin Waring University of Birmingham
Caroline Sanders
Caroline Sanders University of Manchester
Kieran Walshe
Kieran Walshe University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer a variety of rewarding online degree options. For those interested in mental health, there are several cacrep-accredited online counseling programs that meet rigorous professional accreditation standards and can lead to licensure. If your passion lies in helping families and couples, pursuing a family therapy degree online allows for flexible study while preparing you for work in diverse clinical settings.

For students seeking a broader understanding of human behavior, choosing the cheapest online psychology degree can be a cost-effective way to start a career in counseling, social services, or research. Additionally, if your goal is to make a direct impact in social work, consider applying to the easiest msw online programs to get into, which combine accessibility with practical training.

These online degrees not only offer affordability and flexibility but also support diverse career paths in education, healthcare, advocacy, and more. Carefully compare programs to find the best fit for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth McDonald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles